Effect of dried distillers grains plus solubles on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from growing beef cattle1

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 2846-2857 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hünerberg ◽  
S. M. McGinn ◽  
K. A. Beauchemin ◽  
E. K. Okine ◽  
O. M. Harstad ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hünerberg ◽  
S. M. McGinn ◽  
K. A. Beauchemin ◽  
E. K. Okine ◽  
O. M. Harstad ◽  
...  

Hünerberg, M., McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A., Okine, E. K., Harstad, O. M. and McAllister, T. A. 2013. Effect of dried distillers’ grains with solubles on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from finishing beef cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 373–385. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of corn- or wheat-based dried distillers’ grains with solubles (CDDGS, WDDGS) on enteric methane (CH4) emissions from finishing beef cattle, and to determine if any observed reductions were a result of the fat content of CDDGS. A second objective was to compare the effect of CDDGS or WDDGS on N excretion. The experiment was designed as replicated 4×4 Latin square with 28-d periods using 16 ruminally fistulated crossbred heifers. The control diet contained 87% barley grain, 8% barley silage and 5% supplement (dry matter; DM basis). Treatment diets were formulated by replacing 40% DM of barley grain with CDDGS, WDDGS, or corn oil supplemented WDDGS (WDDGS+oil). For the WDDGS+oil diet 6.5% corn oil was added to WDDGS (3.4% fat DM) to achieve a similar fat level as in CDDGS (9.7% DM). All diets were fed as total mixed rations once daily ad libitum. Total collection of urine and faeces was conducted between days 18 and 21. Methane was measured between days 25 and 28 using four identical open circuit respiratory chambers. Compared with WDDGS, feeding CDDGS and WDDGS+oil reduced (P<0.05) CH4emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake (GEI) from 5.5 to 4.0 and 4.2%, respectively. Feeding CDDGS also reduced (P<0.05) CH4emissions compared with the control (5.0% of GEI), while WDDGS+oil tended (P=0.08) to elicit a similar response. Methane (% of GEI) between WDDGS and the control did not differ (P=0.29). Excretion of total N was greater (P<0.001) for CDDGS, WDDGS and WDDGS+oil (220, 253, and 265 g d−1) compared with the control (143 g d−1). Although oil appears to be responsible for reducing CH4emissions when DDGS is included in the diet, increased N excretion requires that a complete life cycle assessment be conducted to assess the full impact of DDGS on greenhouse gas emissions from finishing cattle.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Cristina Meister ◽  
Abmael da Silva Cardoso ◽  
Fernando Oliveira Alari ◽  
Nailson Lima Santos Lemos ◽  
Rosa Toyoko Shiraishi Frighetto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfeng Chang ◽  
Shushi Peng ◽  
Philippe Ciais ◽  
Marielle Saunois ◽  
Shree R. S. Dangal ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuezhao Sun ◽  
David Pacheco ◽  
Dongwen Luo

A series of experiments was conducted in New Zealand to evaluate the potential of forage brassicas for mitigation of enteric methane emissions. Experiments involved sheep and cattle fed winter and summer varieties of brassica forage crops. In the sheep-feeding trials, it was demonstrated that several species of forage brassicas can result, to a varying degree, in a lower methane yield (g methane per kg of DM intake) than does ryegrass pasture. Pure forage rape fed as a winter crop resulted in 37% lower methane yields than did pasture. Increasing the proportion of forage rape in the diet of sheep fed pasture linearly decreased methane yield. Feeding forage rape to cattle also resulted in 44% lower methane yield than did feeding pasture. In conclusion, reductions in methane emission are achievable by feeding forage brassicas, especially winter forage rape, to sheep and cattle. Investigating other aspects of these crops is warranted to establish their value as a viable mitigation tool in pastoral farming.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Moorby ◽  
H. R. Fleming ◽  
V. J. Theobald ◽  
M. D. Fraser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document