0383 Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
D. M. Thekkoot ◽  
R. A. Kemp ◽  
N. J. Boddicker ◽  
G. Plastow
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Reproduction Traits

scholarly journals Using Machine Learning To Improve the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction on Reproduction Traits in Pigs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Wang ◽  
Shaolei Shi ◽  
Guijiang Wang ◽  
Wenxue Luo ◽  
Xia Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Prediction Ability ◽  
Reproduction Traits ◽  
Yorkshire Pigs ◽  
Robust Prediction

Abstract Background Recently, machine learning (ML) is becoming attractive in genomic prediction, while its superiority in genomic prediction and the choosing of optimal ML methods are needed investigation. Results In this study, 2566 Chinese Yorkshire pigs with reproduction traits records were used, they were genotyped with GenoBaits Porcine SNP 50K and PorcineSNP50 panel. Four ML methods, including support vector regression (SVR), kernel ridge regression (KRR), random forest (RF) and Adaboost.R2 were implemented. Through 20 replicates of five-fold cross-validation, the genomic prediction abilities of ML methods were explored. Compared with genomic BLUP(GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) and Bayesian method BayesHE, our results indicated that ML methods significantly outperformed. The prediction accuracy of ML methods was improved by 19.3%, 15.0% and 20.8% on average over GBLUP, ssGBLUP and BayesHE, ranging from 8.9–24.0%, 7.6–17.5% and 11.1–24.6%, respectively. In addition, ML methods yielded smaller mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) in all scenarios. ssGBLUP yielded improvement of 3.7% on average compared to GBLUP, and the performance of BayesHE was close to GBLUP. Among four ML methods, SVR and KRR had the most robust prediction abilities, which yielded higher accuracies, lower bias, lower MSE and MAE, and comparable computing efficiency as GBLUP. RF demonstrated the lowest prediction ability and computational efficiency among ML methods. Conclusion Our findings demonstrated that ML methods are more efficient than traditional genomic selection methods, and it could be new options for genomic prediction.

scholarly journals Genomic Prediction Using Alternative Strategies of Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP for Yearling Weight and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Hossein Mehrban ◽  
Masoumeh Naserkheil ◽  
Deuk Hwan Lee ◽  
Chungil Cho ◽  
Taejeong Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Carcass Traits ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased

The weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method has been proposed to exploit information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives, allowing the use of weights for single-nucleotide polymorphism in the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genetic prediction using the following single-trait best linear unbiased prediction methods in Hanwoo beef cattle: pedigree-based (PBLUP), un-weighted (ssGBLUP), and weighted (WssGBLUP) single-step genomic methods. We also assessed the impact of alternative single and window weighting methods according to their effects on the traits of interest. The data was comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight (YW) and 5622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness: BFT, carcass weight: CW, eye muscle area: EMA, and marbling score: MS). Also, the genotypic data included 6616 animals for YW and 5134 for carcass traits on the 43,950 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The ssGBLUP showed significant improvement in genomic prediction accuracy for carcass traits (71%) and yearling weight (99%) compared to the pedigree-based method. The window weighting procedures performed better than single SNP weighting for CW (11%), EMA (11%), MS (3%), and YW (6%), whereas no gain in accuracy was observed for BFT. Besides, the improvement in accuracy between window WssGBLUP and the un-weighted method was low for BFT and MS, while for CW, EMA, and YW resulted in a gain of 22%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, which indicates the presence of relevant quantitative trait loci for these traits. These findings indicate that WssGBLUP is an appropriate method for traits with a large quantitative trait loci effect.

scholarly journals Genomic prediction in a nuclear population of layers using single-step models

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyuan Yan ◽  
Guiqin Wu ◽  
Aiqiao Liu ◽  
Congjiao Sun ◽  
Wenpeng Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Single Step

scholarly journals The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2685-2694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ling Hsu ◽  
Dorian J. Garrick ◽  
Rohan L. Fernando
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Single Step

scholarly journals The accuracy and bias of single-step genomic prediction for populations under selection

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ling Hsu ◽  
Dorian J. Garrick ◽  
Rohan L. Fernando
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Alternative Analysis ◽  
Genomic Analyses ◽  
Causal Variants ◽  
Entire Matrix ◽  
C And N ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Missing Genotypes ◽  
Improved Accuracy

ABSTRACTIn single-step analyses, missing genotypes are explicitly or implicitly imputed, and this requires centering the observed genotypes, ideally using the mean of the unselected founders. If genotypes are only available on selected individuals, centering on the unselected founder mean is impossible. Here, computer simulation is used to study an alternative analysis that does not require centering genotypes but fits the mean µg of unselected individuals as a fixed effect. To improve numerical properties of the analysis, centering the entire matrix of observed and imputed genotypes, using their sample means can be done in addition to fitting µg. Starting with observed diplotypes from 721 cattle, a 5 generation population was simulated with sire selection to produce 40,000 individuals with phenotypes of which the 1,000 sires had genotypes. The next generation of 8,000 genotyped individuals was used for validation. Evaluations were undertaken: with (J) or without (N) µg when marker covariates were not centered; and with (JC) or without (C) µg when all marker covariates were centered. A pedigree based evaluation was less accurate than genomic analyses. Centering did not influence accuracy of genomic prediction, but fitting µg did. Accuracies were improved when the panel comprised only QTL, models JC and J had accuracies of 99.2%; and models C and N had accuracies of 85.6%. When only markers were in the panel, the 4 models had accuracies of 63.9%. In panels that included causal variants, fitting µg in the model improved accuracy, but had little impact when the panel contained only markers.

scholarly journals Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genomic Prediction of Duroc Boars’ Sperm Morphology Abnormalities

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxiang Zhao ◽  
Ning Gao ◽  
Jian Cheng ◽  
Saeed El-Ashram ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Sperm Morphology ◽  
Genetic Parameter ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Swine Production ◽  
Forward Prediction ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
First Time

Artificial insemination (AI) has been used globally as a routine technology in the swine production industry. However, genetic parameters and genomic prediction accuracy of semen traits have seldom been reported. In this study, we estimated genetic parameters and conducted genomic prediction for five types of sperm morphology abnormalities in a large Duroc boar population. The estimated heritability of the studied traits ranged from 0.029 to 0.295. In the random cross-validation scenario, the predictive ability ranged from 0.212 to 0.417 for genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and from 0.249 to 0.565 for single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). In the forward prediction scenario, the predictive ability ranged from 0.069 to 0.389 for GBLUP and from 0.085 to 0.483 for ssGBLUP. In conclusion, the studied sperm morphology abnormalities showed moderate to low heritability. Both GBLUP and ssGBLUP showed comparative predictive abilities of breeding values, and ssGBLUP outperformed GBLUP under many circumstances in respect to predictive ability. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the genetic parameters and genomic predictive ability of these traits were reported in such a large Duroc boar population.

scholarly journals Correction: Multi-trait single-step genomic prediction accounting for heterogeneous (co)variances over the genome

Heredity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 618-618
Author(s):  
Emre Karaman ◽  
Mogens S. Lund ◽  
Guosheng Su
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Single Step

scholarly journals Multi-Year Dynamics of Single-Step Genomic Prediction in an Applied Wheat Breeding Program

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1591
Author(s):  
Sebastian Michel ◽  
Franziska Löschenberger ◽  
Ellen Sparry ◽  
Christian Ametz ◽  
Hermann Bürstmayr
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Wheat Breeding ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Wheat Breeding Program ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Line Breeding ◽  
Cost Efficient

The availability of cost-efficient genotyping technologies has facilitated the implementation of genomic selection into numerous breeding programs. However, some studies reported a superiority of pedigree over genomic selection in line breeding, and as, aside from systematic record keeping, no additional costs are incurring in pedigree-based prediction, the question about the actual benefit of fingerprinting several hundred lines each year might suggest itself. This study aimed thus on shedding some light on this question by comparing pedigree, genomic, and single-step prediction models using phenotypic and genotypic data that has been collected during a time period of ten years in an applied wheat breeding program. The mentioned models were for this purpose empirically tested in a multi-year forward prediction as well as a supporting simulation study. Given the availability of deep pedigree records, pedigree prediction performed similar to genomic prediction for some of the investigated traits if preexisting information of the selection candidates was available. Notwithstanding, blending both information sources increased the prediction accuracy and thus the selection gain substantially, especially for low heritable traits. Nevertheless, the largest advantage of genomic predictions can be seen for breeding scenarios where such preexisting information is not systemically available or difficult and costly to obtain.

scholarly journals SeqBreed: a python tool to evaluate genomic prediction in complex scenarios

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pérez-Enciso ◽  
L. C. Ramírez-Ayala ◽  
L.M. Zingaretti
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Drosophila Genome ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Complex Phenotypes ◽  
Genome Wide

AbstractBackgroundGenomic Prediction (GP) is the procedure whereby molecular information is used to predict complex phenotypes. Although GP can significantly enhance predictive accuracy, it can be expensive and difficult to implement. To help in designing optimum experiments, including genome wide association studies and genomic selection experiments, we have developed SeqBreed, a generic and flexible python3 forward simulator.ResultsSeqBreed accommodates sex and mitochondrion chromosomes as well as autopolyploidy. It can simulate any number of complex phenotypes determined by any number of causal loci. SeqBreed implements several GP methods, including single step GBLUP. We demonstrate its functionality with Drosophila Genome Reference Panel (DGRP) sequence data and with tetraploid potato genotypes.ConclusionsSeqBreed is a flexible and easy to use tool appropriate for optimizing GP or genome wide association studies. It incorporates some of the most popular GP methods and includes several visualization tools. Code is open and can be freely modified. Software, documentation and examples are available at https://github.com/miguelperezenciso/SeqBreed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document