0010 Effect of processing of supplemental corn on metabolizable protein of beef cows grazing winter wheat pasture

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
C. S. Hebbert ◽  
M. A. Lopez-Baca ◽  
L. Avendaño-Reyes ◽  
U. Macias-Cruz ◽  
S. A. Soto-Navarro
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Metabolizable Protein ◽  
Wheat Pasture

scholarly journals Effect of degree of processing supplemental corn on metabolizable protein of beef cows consuming low-quality forage supplemented with cottonseed meal

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_S1) ◽  
pp. S72-S74
Author(s):  
Jesus J Figueroa-Zamudio ◽  
Jovannah Ramirez ◽  
Ulises A Sanchez-Sandoval ◽  
Brandon G Smythe ◽  
Eric J Scholljegerdes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cottonseed Meal ◽  
Beef Cows ◽  
Metabolizable Protein

Influence of grazing dormant native range or winter wheat pasture on subsequent finishing cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and ruminal metabolism1,2

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 3191-3201 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. Choat ◽  
C. R. Krehbiel ◽  
G. C. Duff ◽  
R. E. Kirksey ◽  
L. M. Lauriault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Carcass Characteristics ◽  
Native Range ◽  
Finishing Cattle ◽  
Wheat Pasture ◽  
Cattle Performance

scholarly journals Feathermeal/bloodmeal liquid suspensions for calves grazing winter wheat pasture

1997 ◽  
pp. 70-72
Author(s):  
Gerry L. Kuhl ◽  
G.E. Jr. LeValley ◽  
G.D. McCormack ◽  
Dale A. Blasi ◽  
James S. Drouillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Pasture ◽  
Liquid Suspensions

scholarly journals Energy Supplementation Strategies for Wheat Pasture Stocker Cattle Under Uncertain Forage Availability

1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nouhoun Coulibaly ◽  
Daniel J. Bernardo ◽  
Gerald W. Horn
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Risk Attitudes ◽  
Market Conditions ◽  
Production Risk ◽  
Forage Availability ◽  
Input Use ◽  
Stocker Cattle ◽  
Wheat Pasture ◽  
Energy Supplementation

AbstractEnergy supplementation provides a means of reducing production risk of growing stocker cattle on winter wheat pasture. This study addresses the issue of risk aversion and energy supplement input use. Differences in supplementation practices induced by risk aversion and the effects of cattle and feed market conditions are examined. Results show that supplementation practices are likely to be similar across producers, irrespective of their risk attitudes. Cattle and feed market conditions, however, markedly affect supplementation practices. These findings provide information for assisting stockmen in identifying efficient supplementation strategies.

scholarly journals 172 Effect of energy and lasalocid supplementation on stocker cattle performance grazing winter-wheat pasture

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Author(s):  
Autumn Pickett ◽  
Stacey Gunter
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Southern Plains ◽  
Stocker Cattle ◽  
Nitrogen Intake ◽  
Wheat Pasture ◽  
Grazing Period ◽  
Irrigated Wheat ◽  
Rapid City ◽  
Southern Plain ◽  
At Will

Abstract Wheat pasture is unique to the Southern Plains where income can be reaped from the grazed forage followed by a grain harvest. The performance by cattle grazing is excellent, but nitrogen intake is excessive, resulting in inefficient use. Highly digestible supplements that are low in protein have been shown to augment ADG and improve nitrogen utilization. At the Southern Plain Experimental Range near Fort Supply, OK, an experiment was conducted to examine a supplement high in digestible fiber at multiple level of intake with or without 66 g of lasalocid/tonne. Sixty-five steers (324 ± 0.52 kg) grazed 41-ha of irrigated wheat pasture for 64 d. The supplement (4-Square Stocker/Grower 14; 14% CP; Purina Animal Nutrition, Shoreview, MN) was placed in 1 of 2 SmartFeed Plus feeders (C-Lock, Inc., Rapid City, SD); 1 feeder with the control feed and the other contained lasalocid. Each feeder was programmed to allow maximum intakes of 1.2, 2.0, and 3.2 kg/d for 8 or 9 steers at each level. So, there were 24 non-supplemented, 21 energy supplemented, and 21 energy supplemented steers with lasalocid. Because steers had liberty to consume supplement at will and only limited by a maximum, actual supplement intakes were calculated for the grazing period and steer performances were regressed on supplement intakes. Each kilogram of supplement increased (P = 0.04) ADG by 73 g/d; however, lasalocid did not increase (P = 0.73) ADG (avg ADG = 1.7 kg). Total BW gain by each steer (kg) was increased (P = 0.04) 4.7 kg for each kilogram of supplement fed daily and again, lasalocid did not increase (P = 0.73) performance (avg total BW gain = 109 kg). Supplementation with a moderate CP feed increased the ADG of steers grazing winter-wheat pasture, but the addition of lasalocid showed no benefit in this experiment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document