scholarly journals In situ grommet and fitness for flying

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
AVK Raju ◽  
S Saxena ◽  
SS Mohapatra

Introduction: Current policies followed in the country do not permit aircrew to fly with in situ grommet. This paper discusses the aeromedical implications of in situ grommet, assessment of its flying fitness, and the factors which may be considered for possible reflighting of such cases. Case Details: A 19 year old civil pilot developed otitic barotrauma middle ear (right) which was managed with the placement of grommet in the tympanic membrane (TM). He was awarded fitness to fly on removal of grommet and after complete closure of the residual TM perforation. Another case, a 50 year old military pilot, a case of chronic suppurative otitis media (inactive) left ear, after uneventful recovery, was awarded flying medical category initially for in situ grommet and subsequently for single dry perforation TM in the left ear with an waiver from the competent medical authority. Discussion: Insertion of grommet, in cases with middle ear effusion and/or infection following Eustachian tube dysfunction, is a common practice to promote early recovery. However, as per the current policies in India, such aircrew are considered unfit for flying duty. Policies in other countries, military and civil, are mostly silent. This paper recommends the award of flying fitness for aircrew with in situ grommet provided that the clinical condition is stable, there are no complications and hearing is normal. This paper also discusses the award of flying fitness for aircrew with single and uncomplicated TM perforation with normal hearing for a specific type of aircraft.

1985 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S203-S205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen F. Ryan ◽  
Jeffrey P. Harris ◽  
Antonino Catanzaro ◽  
Stephen I. Wasserman

1984 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 53-54

Acute suppurative otitis media (AOM) is a common, painful condition affecting 20% of children under 4 years at least once a year,1 and perhaps more in infancy when clinical examination is most difficult. Infectious complications such as mastoiditis, meningitis and cerebral abscess are now rare, but chronic middle ear effusion and hearing loss remain common. Hearing loss may persist long after the infective episode,2 and may impair learning.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1198-1199
Author(s):  
A. Mervyn Fox

I would like to draw to the attention of readers of the paper by Donaldson ("Surgical Management Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and its Importance in Middle Ear Effusion," Pediatrics 61:6774-6777, 1978) a recent report by Brown et al (Brown MJKM, Richards SH, Ambegaokar AG: "Grommets and Glue Ear—A Five-Year Followup of a Controlled Trial," J R Soc Med 71:353-356, 1978) in which the results of management of seromucinous otitis media were studied in 60 matched pairs of ears by drainage in one ear and conservative management in the other.


1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 752-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Mattucci ◽  
Barak J. Greenfield

Middle ear effusion (MEE), in its various forms, is one of the most common disorders of childhood. There are several possible etiologies, depending on the makeup of the effusion. However, the common factor in many middle ear effusions is eustachian tube dysfunction, and the role of allergy, although only one of many possible causes, is significant. A relatively large number of children with MEE are found to have atopic disorders. Nonetheless, allergy treatment alone must not preclude the use of conventional medical and surgical therapy. Optimal results will be obtained if recurrent or persistent MEE is managed in a coordinated manner by the otologist, pediatrician and allergist.


2002 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoke W. Pollock ◽  
Charles S. Ebert ◽  
Marc G. Dubin ◽  
David R. White ◽  
Jiri Prazma ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the role of soluble interleukin (IL)-4 receptors (sIL-4R) and IL-5 antibodies (IL-5Ab) in preventing allergic eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear effusion (MEE). STUDY DESIGN: Brown-Norway rats were sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA) and challenged transtympanically. Two groups of rats received either IL-4R or IL-5Ab transtympanically 1 hour before challenge. Three additional groups were used as controls. Following the second transtympanic challenge, the ventilatory and clearance functions of the eustachian tube (ET) were assessed at 0, 2, and 8 hours. Histology was prepared using cut paraffin sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. RESULTS: sIL-4R-pretreated rats showed no significant changes in ventilatory or clearance functions of the ET or inflammatory changes in ET mucosa, whereas IL-5Ab pretreatment showed significant late ventilatory and clearance dysfunction as well as inflammatory mucosal changes. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the late-phase allergic inflammatory response that leads to subsequent formation of ETD and MEE is prevented by pretreatment with sIL-4R and, more modestly, with IL-5Ab. Otitis media with effusion (OME) remains a significant problem in the pediatric population today. Despite advances in screening and treatment, the incidence has steadily risen over the past 20 years. It is now estimated that more than 80% of all children with have at least 1 episode of OME by age 3 and 40% will have 3 or more episodes. 1 Furthermore, earaches/ear infections represent the single greatest reason for a visit to the pediatrician after well-child visits. 2 Numerous studies have investigated the sequelae for children exposed to multiple episodes of OME, with conclusions ranging from no significant permanent deficits to impairments in receptive language skills, 1 balance and coordination, 3 and school readiness measures. 4 There remain several important controversies with regards to the pathogenesis and treatment of OME. One of these is the relationship between OME and allergy. A link between OME and allergy has existed for some time, 5 and one of the older empiric observations on the relationship between children with recurrent OME and allergy has resurfaced in recent years to explain the large number of patients with no other causative factor for fluid in the middle ear space. Bernstein 6 has demonstrated in a study of 100 patients with recurrent OME that almost a third can be attributed directly to allergy. Indeed, some consider this number a very conservative estimate. It is the intent of this study to examine the role of newer therapies such as antagonists to interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 for preventing the late-phase allergic reaction and their effect of preventing eustachian tube dysfunction and formation of middle ear effusion. IL−4 and −5 are 2 of a host of mediators that comprise the late-phase allergic response. Produced by a variety of cell types, their principal functions are to control subsequent cascades that are a response to antigenic challenge. Tissue inflammation, edema formation, mucus production, and eosinophilia are controlled by these cytokines. Our hypothesis is that administration of antagonists of both IL−4 and IL−5, in the form of sIL-4R and IL−5Ab, respectively, will result in a decreased allergic response to challenged tissue.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack L. Paradise ◽  
Charles D. Bluestone

In 138 infants with cleft palate, secretory or suppurative otitis media was a universal complication. Middle ear aeration was instituted by means of myringotomy, aspiration of middle ear liquid, and insertion of tympanostomy tubes, and this procedure was repeated whenever recurrence of middle ear effusion followed blockage or extrusion of the tubes. In infants with either complete or incomplete clefts of the palate, satisfactory middle ear status could usually be maintained. Otorrhea through tympanostomy tubes occurred frequently, but usually responded promptly to treatment. Palate repair resulted in sharp improvement in middle ear status. Early relief of middle ear effusion anti establishment and maintenance of middle ear aeration in infants with cleft palate may help maintain normal hearing acuity throughout infancy, with favorable implications for language and intellectual development, and may reduce the risk of permanent middle ear damage and hearing impairment. Further study is necessary to determine the long-term efficacy of this regimen.


1991 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 539-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Thompson ◽  
J. A. Crowther

AbstractSixty-three patients undergoing surgery to the nasal septum followed by bilateral packing had pre- and post-operative tympanometry in order to determine the effect on eustachian tube function. Fifty-five of the 126 ears tested (46 per cent) developed a reduction in middle ear pressure of at least 50 daPa; 76 per cent became normal within 24 hours of removing the nasal packs. All ears were asymptomatic and no patient had evidence of middle ear effusion. Nasal packing following septal surgery is a frequent cause of shortlasting eustachian tube dysfunction but rarely severe enough to cause symptoms or middle ear effusion. Tubal dysfunction is most likely due to a combination of surgical oedema and a direct effect of the nasal packing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdullah Hamd ◽  
Essam Abd El-Wanes Behiry ◽  
Adel Tharwat Atallah ◽  
Sherif Maher Elaini ◽  
Ahmed Hamdy Alshafai

Abstract Background Nowadays, radiotherapy is widely used in management of many types of tumors including head and neck tumors; in this study, we concerned with its reverse effects on the Eustachian tube functions and if this effect is temporary or permanent. Results The whole (30) patients have tympanogram at both ears before starting radiotherapy; all patients (100%) were normal. In the immediate post radiotherapy tympanogram at the contralateral side, 6.7% of patients had effusion, and 20% had Eustachian tube dysfunction, while at the ipsilateral side, 20% of patients had effusion, and 33.3% had ET dysfunction. In the follow-up tympanogram 12 weeks post radiotherapy, we found that 6.7% of patients had effusion, and (10%) had Eustachian tube dysfunction at the contralateral side, while 6.7% of patients had effusion, and only 20% had Eustachian tube dysfunction at the ipsilateral side. Conclusion From this study, we concluded that patients with head and neck tumors treated by radiotherapy (apart from the nasopharynx) have a high incidence of affection of Eustachian tube function namely middle ear effusion and Eustachian tube dysfunction. The possibility for development of middle ear effusion and Eustachian tube dysfunction increases with increased tumor stage. Eustachian tube functions immediately post radiotherapy and after 12 weeks of the end of radiotherapy was affected by different effects according to the tumor site. The Eustachian tube functions significantly improved within 12 weeks after the last dose of radiotherapy, and we recommend audiological follow-up for patients with head and neck tumors treated with radiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document