scholarly journals Expanded Distribution of Pain as a Sign of Central Sensitization in Individuals With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 1196-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Lluch Girbés ◽  
Lirios Dueñas ◽  
Marco Barbero ◽  
Deborah Falla ◽  
Isabel A.C. Baert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Pain Frequency ◽  
Pain Drawings

AbstractBackgroundExpanded distribution of pain is considered a sign of central sensitization (CS). The relationship between recording of symptoms and CS in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been poorly investigated.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine whether the area of pain assessed using pain drawings relates to CS and clinical symptoms in people with knee OA.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.MethodsFifty-three people with knee OA scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty were studied. All participants completed pain drawings using a novel digital device, completed self-administration questionnaires, and were assessed by quantitative sensory testing. Pain frequency maps were generated separately for women and men. Spearman correlation coefficients were computed to reveal possible correlations between the area of pain and quantitative sensory testing and clinical symptoms.ResultsPain frequency maps revealed enlarged areas of pain, especially in women. Enlarged areas of pain were associated with higher knee pain severity (rs=.325, P<.05) and stiffness (rs=.341, P<.05), lower pressure pain thresholds at the knee (rs=−.306, P<.05) and epicondyle (rs=−.308, P<.05), and higher scores with the Central Sensitization Inventory (rs=.456, P<.01). No significant associations were observed between the area of pain and the remaining clinical symptoms and measures of CS.LimitationsFirm conclusions about the predictive role of pain drawings cannot be drawn. Further evaluation of the reliability and validity of pain area extracted from pain drawings in people with knee OA is needed.ConclusionExpanded distribution of pain was correlated with some measures of CS in individuals with knee OA. Pain drawings may constitute an easy way for the early identification of CS in people with knee OA, but further research is needed.

scholarly journals Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: Findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H. Finan ◽  
Luis F. Buenaver ◽  
Sara C. Bounds ◽  
Shahid Hussain ◽  
Raymond J. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Radiographic Severity

scholarly journals Sex moderates the effects of positive and negative affect on clinical pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci J. Speed ◽  
Jessica M. Richards ◽  
Patrick H. Finan ◽  
Michael T. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Negative Affect ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Clinical Pain ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
State Affect

AbstractBackground and aimsSex differences in clinical pain severity and response to experimental pain are commonly reported, with women generally showing greater vulnerability. Affect, including state (a single rating) and stable (average daily ratings over two weeks) positive affect and negative affect has also been found to impact pain sensitivity and severity, and research suggests that affect may modulate pain differentially as a function of sex. The current study aimed to examine sex as a moderator of the relationships between affect and pain-related outcomes among participants with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).MethodsOne hundred and seventy-nine participants (59 men) with KOA completed electronic diaries assessing clinical pain, positive affect, and negative affect. A subset of participants (n = 120) underwent quantitative sensory testing, from which a single index of central sensitization to pain was derived. We used multiple regression models to test for the interactive effects of sex and affect (positive versus negative and stable versus state) on pain-related outcomes. We used mixed effects models to test for the moderating effects of sex on the relationships between state affect and pain over time.ResultsSex differences in affect and pain were identified, with men reporting significantly higher stable positive affect and lower central sensitization to pain indexed by quantitative sensory testing, as well as marginally lower KOA-specific clinical pain compared to women. Moreover, there was an interaction between stable positive affect and sex on KOA-specific clinical pain and average daily non-specific pain ratings. Post hoc analyses revealed that men showed trends towards an inverse relationship between stable positive affect and pain outcomes, while women showed no relationship between positive affect and pain. There was also a significant interaction between sex and stable negative affect and sex on KOA-specific pain such that men showed a significantly stronger positive relationship between stable negative affect and KOA-specific pain than women. Sex did not interact with state affect on pain outcomes.ConclusionsFindings suggest that men may be particularly sensitive to the effects of stable positive affect and negative affect on clinical pain. Future work with larger samples is needed in order to identify potential mechanisms driving the sex-specific effects of affect on pain.ImplicationsThe current study provides novel data that suggesting that the association of positive affect, negative affect, and pain are different in men versus women with KOA. Further understanding of the difference in affective expression between men and women may lead to the development of novel therapeutic interventions and help to identify additional modifiable factors in the prevention and management of pain.

Convergent Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders; Associations with Quantitative Sensory Testing, Pain Intensity, Fatigue, and Psychosocial Factors

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3401-3412
Author(s):  
Erwin Hendriks ◽  
Lennard Voogt ◽  
Dorine Lenoir ◽  
Iris Coppieters ◽  
Kelly Ickmans
Keyword(s):  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Central Sensitization Inventory ◽  
Whiplash Associated Disorders ◽  
Chronic Whiplash

Abstract Objective Central sensitization is present in different pain conditions, including chronic whiplash-associated disorders. In the absence of a gold standard method of assessment to determine the presence of central sensitization, quantitative sensory testing is currently understood as an optimal proxy. Laboratory sensory testing is, however, not feasible in clinical practice, and the Central Sensitization Inventory was developed as an alternative. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory in chronic whiplash-associated patients by determining the association between the Central Sensitization Inventory and quantitative sensory testing, pain intensity, fatigue, and psychosocial factors. Methods A total of 125 chronic whiplash-associated patients completed multiple questionnaires and were subjected to pressure pain thresholds and temporal summation. Results . The Central Sensitization Inventory showed a strong association with constructs of general psychopathology, anxiety, distress, depression, and somatization in chronic whiplash-associated disorders. Moderate correlations were found with fatigue and intrusive and avoidant phenomena after a variety of traumatic events. No significant association was found between the Central Sensitization Inventory and pressure pain thresholds and temporal summation, nor between the Central Sensitization Inventory and other pain measurements. Conclusions Overall, we found that the Central Sensitization Inventory is better in identifying the psychosocial factors related to central sensitization in chronic whiplash-associated disorders than the central nervous system adaptations. Thus, the convergent validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory appears to be only partially present in chronic whiplash-associated disorders.

THE EFFECT OF A TRIPOD CANE ON THE FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY OF PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Nelson Sudiyono
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Walking Aids ◽  
Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Symptomatic Knee ◽  
Contralateral Hand ◽  
Painful Knee

Background: Canes have been recommended as walking aids for knee osteoarthritis to reduce the loading on the affected knee. Patients are usually recommended to hold the cane in the contralateral hand to the affected knee. Nevertheless, some patients prefer to hold the cane ipsilateral to the affected knee. However, the effect of using ipsilateral or contralateral tripod cane on functional mobility in patients with knee osteoarthritis is still unknown Objective: To compare the immediate effect of ipsilateral and contralateral tripod cane usage on functional mobility in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis Method: This cross-sectional study involved 30 overweight or obese patients with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren Lawrence grade 2 and 3) who never use a cane. Functional mobility was evaluated with Time Up and Go test in three conditions; without walking aid, with tripod cane contralateral and ipsilateral to the more painful knee. Results: The TUG time of aid-free walking is 4.75 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 3.79 - 5.71) seconds faster than ipsilateral cane use and 6.69 (p < 0.001, 95%CI 5.35 - 8.03) seconds faster than contralateral cane use. The TUG time of ipsilateral cane use is 1,94 (95% CI, 1.13 - 2.79) seconds faster than contralateral. Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic knee OA who use tripod cane ipsilateral to the more painful knee have higher functional mobility than the contralateral.

scholarly journals Central Sensıtızatıon ın Axıal Spondyloarthrıtıs: An Exploratıve Study wıth Quantıtatıve Sensory Testıng and Clınıcal Scales

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feyza Nur Yücel ◽  
Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz
Keyword(s):  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Clinical Scales ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the central sensitization (CS) and the related parameters in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Quantitative sensory testing (QST) which consists of pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were applied to the participants. Disease activity, functional status, sleep quality, pain, depression, and fatigue were assessed. Patients were divided as the ones with and without CS according to the central sensitization inventory (CSI) and the results were compared. Results One hundred patients and fifty controls were recruited. Sixty axSpA patients had CS. When QST results were compared between the patient and control groups, all PPT scores were found lower (p&lt;0.05) in patients. Regarding the comparison of the patients with and without CS, sacroiliac, and trapezius PPT scores were found lower in the patients with CS (p&lt;0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the mean TS scores (p&gt;0.05) between patients and controls, and in patients with and without CS. All investigated comorbidities were found to be significantly more frequent (p&lt;0.001) in the patients with CS. In regression analysis female gender, morning stiffness duration, CPM, depression, and fatigue were detected as related parameters with CSI scores. Conclusion CS and related comorbidities were found to be increased in axSpA patients. This increase should be taken into consideration in the management of these patients.

scholarly journals Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions for the Cartilage Repair of Grade 2 and 3 Knee Osteoarthritis: A Confirmatory Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Qing Bi ◽  
Taihen Yu ◽  
Zheping Hong ◽  
Yu Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Cartilage Regeneration ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundCartilage defect remains one of the most important reasons for the rapid development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Numerous reports have confirmed the safety and clinical efficacy of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions (SVF), which has recently been used clinically to treat patients with knee OA. However, there is still no consensus as to whether SVF can promote cartilage regeneration. Herein, we purposed to evaluate the effectiveness of SVF in cartilage regeneration by developing cartilage model based on the 3D-FS-SPGR sequence.MethodsPatients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 knee OA were recruited in our research. Then, we monitored patients and subsequently scored symptoms using WOMAC, VAS, and range of motion (ROM) before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The WORMS and MOCART were recorded by magnetic resonance imaging. The cartilage model of the patient was established using the 3D-FS-SPGR sequence, while the relevant parameters of the model were counted at baseline, 6, and 12 months.ResultsWe enrolled 47 patients (53 knees) with knee OA in this study, of which 29 knees were classified as grade 2, while 24 were assigned grade 3. No treatment-related adverse event was observed in our study. Notably, WOMAC, VAS, and ROM showed a significant improvement at 12 months. We further found that the thickness, volume, and surface of the cartilage defect decreased, while the volume of healthy cartilage increased in all regions, particularly in the medial femoral and tibia condyle. Moreover, the scores of WORMS and MOCART revealed a substantial improvement of cartilage repair at 12 months. ConclusionsTaken together, this study shows that intra-articular injection of SVF into the knee markedly improved the clinical symptoms of patients without the occurrence of adverse events, thereby repairing the damaged articular cartilage through cartilage regeneration.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered. Chinses Clinical Trial Registry with identifier ChiCTR2100042930. Registered 28 January 2021.

scholarly journals Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina WS Sit ◽  
Vincent CH Chung ◽  
Kenneth D. Reeves ◽  
David Rabago ◽  
Keith KW Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Composite Scale ◽  
Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Symptomatic Knee ◽  
Pain Subscale ◽  
Hypertonic Dextrose

Abstract Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) is an emerging treatment for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) but its efficacy is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to synthesize clinical evidence on the effect of prolotherapy for knee OA. Fifteen electronic databases were searched from their inception to September 2015. The primary outcome of interest was score change on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moderate risk of bias and one quasi–randomized trial were included, with data from a total of 258 patients. In the meta-analysis of two eligible studies, prolotherapy is superior to exercise alone by a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.18 to 1.45, p = 0.012), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.25 to 1.30, p = 0.001) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.04 to 1.20, p = 0.035) on the WOMAC composite scale; and WOMAC function and pain subscale scores respectively. Moderate heterogeneity exists in all cases. Overall, prolotherapy conferred a positive and significant beneficial effect in the treatment of knee OA. Adequately powered, longer-term trials with uniform end points are needed to better elucidate the efficacy of prolotherapy.

scholarly journals Pharmaceutical-grade Chondroitin sulfate is as effective as celecoxib and superior to placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the ChONdroitin versus CElecoxib versus Placebo Trial (CONCEPT)

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1537-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Reginster ◽  
Jean Dudler ◽  
Tomasz Blicharski ◽  
Karel Pavelka
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Chondroitin Sulfate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Symptomatic Knee ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

ObjectivesChondroitin sulfate 800 mg/day (CS) pharmaceutical-grade in the management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis consistent with the European Medicines Agency guideline.MethodsA prospective, randomised, 6-month, 3-arm, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and celecoxib (200 mg/day)-controlled trial assessing changes in pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and in the Lequesne Index (LI) as coprimary endpoints. Minimal-Clinically Important Improvement (MCII), Patient-Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) were used as secondary endpoints.Results604 patients (knee osteoarthritis) diagnosed according to American College of Rheumalogy (ACR) criteria, recruited in five European countries and followed for 182 days. CS and celecoxib showed a greater significant reduction in pain and LI than placebo. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, pain reduction in VAS at day 182 in the CS group (−42.6 mm) and in celecoxib group (−39.5 mm) was significantly greater than the placebo group (−33.3 mm) (p=0.001 for CS and p=0.009 for celecoxib), while no difference observed between CS and celecoxib. Similar trend for the LI, as reduction in this metric in the CS group (−4.7) and celecoxib group (−4.6) was significantly greater than the placebo group (−3.7) (p=0.023 for CS and p=0.015 for celecoxib), no difference was observed between CS and celecoxib. Both secondary endpoints (MCII and PASS) at day 182 improved significantly in the CS and celecoxib groups. All treatments demonstrated excellent safety profiles.ConclusionA 800 mg/day pharmaceutical-grade CS is superior to placebo and similar to celecoxib in reducing pain and improving function over 6 months in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. This formulation of CS should be considered a first-line treatment in the medical management of knee OA.

scholarly journals Depression in patients with knee osteoarthritis: risk factors and associations with joint symptoms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Zheng ◽  
Liudan Tu ◽  
Flavia Cicuttini ◽  
Zhaohua Zhu ◽  
Weiyu Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Symptomatic Knee ◽  
Joint Symptoms ◽  
Patient Health

Abstract Background:To describe demographic and clinical factors associated with the prevalence and incidence of depression and explore the temporal relationship between depression and joint symptoms in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods:413 participants were selected from a randomized controlled trial in people with symptomatic knee OA and vitamin D deficiency (age 63.2 ± 7.0 year, 50.4% female). Depression severity and knee joint symptoms were assessed using the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), respectively, at baseline and 24 months. Results: The prevalence and incidence of depression was 25.4% and 11.2%, respectively. At baseline, having younger age, a higher body mass index (BMI), greater scores of WOMAC pain (PR: 1.05, 95%CI:1.03, 1.07), dysfunction (PR: 1.02, 95%CI:1.01, 1.02) and stiffness (PR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.09), lower education level, having more than one comorbidity and having two or more painful body sites were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of depression. Over 24 months, being female, having a higher WOMAC pain (RR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.09) and dysfunction score (RR: 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.03) at baseline and having two or more painful sites were significantly associated with a higher incidence of depression. In contrast, baseline depression was not associated with changes in knee joint symptoms over 24 months. Conclusion: Knee OA risk factors and joint symptoms, along with co-existing multi-site pain are associated with the prevalence and development of depression. This suggests that managing common OA risk factors and joint symptoms may be important for prevention and treatment depression in patients with knee OA.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01176344Anzctr.org.au identifier: ACTRN12610000495022

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document