scholarly journals Arm and Trunk Movement Kinematics During Seated Reaching Within and Beyond Arm's Length in People With Stroke: A Validity Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 845-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-yi Wu ◽  
Rong-jiuan Liing ◽  
Hsieh-ching Chen ◽  
Chia-ling Chen ◽  
Keh-chung Lin

Background Kinematic analysis is commonly used to objectively measure upper extremity movement performance after stroke. However, the concurrent validity and predictive validity of arm-trunk kinematics during reaching within and beyond arm's length have not been studied. Objective The aim of this study was to estimate the concurrent validity of kinematic measures before and after treatment and the predictive validity for reaching within and beyond arm's length after stroke. Design This was a secondary analysis study. Methods Ninety-seven participants with stroke (mean age=55.9 years [SD=10.9]) received intensive treatment every weekday for 3 to 4 weeks. Kinematic reaching tasks and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were used before and after treatment. The validity of the kinematic measures was estimated in relation to WMFT scores. Results Of the 8 kinematic variables that were measured, index movement time before treatment (R2=.227–.362) and trunk movement time and trunk displacement after treatment (R2=.095–.346) had the strongest association with the WMFT at both reaching distances. Trunk movement time and trunk displacement before treatment explained 6.9% to 14.9% of the variance in the WMFT after treatment. Kinematic variables explained 6.9% to 49.3% and 9.4% to 38.7% of the variance in the WMFT during a task within arm's length and beyond arm's length, respectively. Limitations The study has limited generalizability. Conclusions Different kinematic variables may partially reflect motor function before and after treatment to a limited degree. Although the predictive validity was modest, trunk movement may be considered a prognostic determinant of motor function after treatment. A reaching task within arm's length may be a more suitable measure of kinematic performance for describing motor function than a reaching task beyond arm's length.

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 840-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jau-Hong Lin ◽  
Miao-Ju Hsu ◽  
Ching-Fan Sheu ◽  
Tzung-Shian Wu ◽  
Ruey-Tay Lin ◽  
...  

BackgroundFunctional limitation of the upper extremities is common in patients with stroke. An upper-extremity measure with sound psychometric properties is indispensable for clinical and research use.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of 4 clinical measures for assessing upper-extremity motor function in people with stroke: the upper-extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Test (UE-FM), the upper-extremity subscale of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Wolf Motor Function Test.DesignThis was a prospective, longitudinal study.MethodsFifty-three people with stroke were evaluated with the 4 measures at 4 time points (14, 30, 90, and 180 days after stroke). Thirty-five participants completed all of the assessments. The ceiling and floor effects, validity (concurrent validity and predictive validity), and responsiveness of each measure were examined. Interrater reliability and test-retest reliability also were examined.ResultsAll measures, except for the UE-FM, had significant floor effects or ceiling effects at one or more time points. The Spearman ρ correlation coefficient for each pair of the 4 measures was ≥.81, indicating high concurrent validity. The predictive validity of the 4 measures was satisfactory (Spearman ρ, ≥.51). The responsiveness of the 4 measures at 14 to 180 days after stroke was moderate (.52 ≤ effect size ≤ .79). The 4 measures had good interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], ≥.92) and test-retest reliability (ICC, ≥.97). Only the minimal detectable changes of the UE-FM (8% of the highest possible score) and the ARAT (6%) were satisfactory.LimitationsThe sample size was too small to conduct data analysis according to type or severity of stroke. In addition, the timed component of the Wolf Motor Function Test was not used in this study.ConclusionsAll 4 measures showed sufficient validity, responsiveness, and reliability in participants with stroke. The UE-FM for assessing impairment and the ARAT for assessing disability had satisfactory minimal detectable changes, supporting their utility in clinical settings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1043-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Szu-Ting Fu ◽  
Ching-yi Wu ◽  
Keh-chung Lin ◽  
Ching-ju Hsieh ◽  
Jung-sen Liu ◽  
...  

Objective: We aimed to compare the responsiveness, concurrent and predictive validity of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment (S-FMA) and the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (S-WMFT) in persons with subacute stroke. Design: Test–retest design. Setting: Departments of physical medicine and rehabilitation at three hospitals. Participants: Participants with first-time stroke ( N = 51; 38 men, 13 women; mean age ± SD, 55.1 ± 11.7 years) based on scores of Mini-Mental State Examination and Brunnstrom stage. Interventions: Participants received one of three rehabilitation therapies for three weeks and were evaluated at baseline and end of treatment. Main outcome measures: Responsiveness was examined using the paired t-test and the standardized response mean (SRM). Criterion validity was investigated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( r). Results: Changes from baseline to end of treatment assessed by both tests were significant ( P < 0.001). The value for responsiveness of the S-FMA was significantly higher than that of the S-WMFT (SRM difference, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.63). There were stronger associations between the comparison scales and the S-FMA ( r = 0.57–0.68) than with the S-WMFT ( r = 0.39–0.58). Conclusions: The S-FMA had better concurrent and predictive validity than the S-WMFT and was more sensitive to changes caused by rehabilitation therapies. The S-FMA is recommended for expedited assessment of arm motor function outcome in stroke patients receiving rehabilitative therapy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keh-chung Lin ◽  
Yu-wei Hsieh ◽  
Ching-yi Wu ◽  
Chia-ling Chen ◽  
Yuh Jang ◽  
...  

Objectives. This study aimed to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) in patients with stroke, and to assess the proportions of patients' change scores exceeding the MDC and CID after stroke rehabilitation. Methods. A total of 57 patients received 1 of the 3 treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessments before and after treatment. The MDC, at 90% confidence (MDC 90), was calculated from the standard error of measurement to indicate a real change for individual patients. Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to triangulate the values of minimal CID. The percentages of patients exceeding the MDC and minimal CID were also examined. Results. The MDC90 of the WMFT was 4.36 for the performance time (WMFT time) and 0.37 for the functional ability scale (WMFT FAS). The minimal CID ranged from 1.5 to 2 seconds on the WMFT time and from 0.2 to 0.4 points on the WMFT FAS. The MDC and CID proportions ranged from 14% to 30% on the WMFT time and from 39% to 65% on the WMFT FAS, respectively. Conclusions. The change score of an individual patient has to reach 4.36 and 0.37 on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS to indicate a real change. The mean change scores of a stroke group on the WMFT time and WMFT FAS should achieve 1.5 to 2 seconds and 0.2 to 0.4 points to be regarded as clinically important changes. Furthermore, the WMFT FAS may be more responsive than the WMFT time based on the results of proportions exceeding the threshold criteria.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Gabriela Da Silva Matuti ◽  
Rafaela Do Nascimento Borges Marques ◽  
Amanda Conte Magesto ◽  
Rafael Eras Garcia ◽  
Clarissa Barros De Oliveira

Introdução: A Terapia por Contensão Induzida (TCI) é uma técnica de reabilitação que tem como objetivo melhora da função do membro superior.acometido. Objetivos: Determinar se o protocolo da TCI é adequado para a reabilitação do membro superior em adultos com Lesões Encefálicas Adquiridas (LEA), analisar a manutenção dos resultados e identificar possíveis preditores de eficácia da técnica. Método: Estudo retrospectivo, 40 pacientes. As escalas utilizadas foram Motor Activity Log (MAL), Quantidade (QT) e Qualidade (QL) de movimento do membro superior acometido e Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Resultados e discussão: As médias de QT e QL do membro superior acometido no pré e pós-tratamento tiveram um aumento significativo (p < 0,001), enquanto as do WMFT apresentaram uma redução significativa do tempo (p < 0,001), o que representa uma melhora na habilidade motora e maior uso fora do ambiente terapêutico. Os ganhos foram mantidos após 12 meses do término do protocolo, e não foi evidenciado nenhum preditor de evolução. Conclusão: A TCI demonstrou eficácia na melhora da habilidade motora e reversão do não uso aprendido do membro superior acometido, estes resultados foram mantidos após um ano da intervenção. Não foi evidenciado no estudo nenhum fator preditor de eficácia da técnica.Palavras-chave: lesões encefálicas adquiridas, hemiplegia, terapia por contensão induzida, reabilitação.


2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832199204
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Varley ◽  
Christine T. Shiner ◽  
Liam Johnson ◽  
Penelope A. McNulty ◽  
Angelica G. Thompson-Butel

Background Upper limb (UL) impairment in stroke survivors is both multifactorial and heterogeneous. Stratification of motor function helps identify the most sensitive and appropriate assessments, which in turn aids the design of effective and individualized rehabilitation strategies. We previously developed a stratification method combining the Grooved Pegboard Test (GPT) and Box and Block Test (BBT) to stratify poststroke UL motor function. Objective To investigate the resilience of the stratification method in a larger cohort and establish its appropriateness for clinical practice by investigating limitations of the GPT completion time. Methods Post hoc analysis of motor function for 96 community-dwelling participants with stroke (n = 68 male, 28 female, age 60.8 ± 14 years, 24.4 ± 36.6 months poststroke) was performed using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (F-M), BBT, and GPT. Hypothesis-free and hypothesis-based hierarchical cluster analyses were conducted to determine the resilience of the stratification method. Results The hypothesis-based analysis identified the same functional groupings as the hypothesis-free analysis: low (n = 32), moderate (n = 26), and high motor function (n = 38), with 3 exceptions. Thirty-three of the 38 participants with fine manual dexterity completed the GPT in ≤5 minutes. The remaining 5 participants took 6 to 25 minutes to place all 25 pegs but used alternative movement strategies to complete the test. The GPT time restriction changed the functional profile of the moderate and high motor function groups leading to more misclassifications. Conclusion The stratification method unambiguously classifies participants by UL motor function. While the inclusion of a 5-minute cutoff time for the GPT is preferred for clinical practice, it is not recommended for stratification purposes.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunhee Park ◽  
Tae Gun Kwon ◽  
Won Hyuk Chang ◽  
Yun-Hee Kim

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS) by combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the unaffected primary motor cortex (uM1) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the affected M1 (aM1) on motor functions and corticomotor excitability in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Seventeen chronic stroke patients (12 men; mean age 58.7 years; 12 infarctions and 5 hemorrhages) participated in this double blinded random-order crossover study. All participants received three randomly arranged, dual-mode stimulations with 24 hours of washout period; Condition 1, simultaneous application of 10 Hz rTMS over the aM1 and cathodal tDCS over the uM1; Condition 2, simultaneous application of 10 Hz rTMS over the M1a and anodal tDCS over the uM1; Condition 3, 10 Hz rTMS over the aM1 and sham tDCS over the uM1. Corticomotor excitability using motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and hand motor functions using the sequential motor task were assessed before and after stimulation. Results: MEP amplitude was significantly increased after condition 1 and 3, respectively (p<0.05). The changes of MEP amplitude were significantly higher in condition 1 than condition 2 (p<0.05). In sequential motor task, the movement time was significantly decreased after condition 1 and 3, respectively (p<0.05). The change of movement time was significantly larger in condition 1 than the other conditions (p<0.05). Conclusions: Simultaneous stimulation of cathodal tDCS over the uM1 produced enhancement of 10 Hz rTMS effect over the aM1 in patients with stroke. These results suggest the dual-mode NBS as a method of enhancing motor function probably by inducing interhemispheric interaction of bilateral primary motor cortices in chronic stroke patients (Supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (No.2011-0016960) and a KOSEF grant (M10644000022-06N4400-02210)).


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 842-843
Author(s):  
M. Higashida-Konishi ◽  
K. Izumi ◽  
S. Hama ◽  
Y. Hayashi ◽  
Y. Okano ◽  
...  

Background:In the case of seronegative arthritis, it was difficult to make a differential diagnosis between remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema syndrome (RS3PE) and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (seronegative RA) because the distribution of affected joints was similar and the patients with RS3PE or seronegative RA may have edema.Objectives:To compare the clinical characteristics of RS3PE and seronegative RAMethods:We retrospectively examine consecutive patients diagnosed with RS3PE or seronegative RA in our hospital from 2007 to 2019. Patients in whom both ACPA and RF were negative were included. The patients with RS3PE met the criteria of McCarty et al.: (1) pitting edema of the dorsum of both hands and both feet, (2) sudden onset of polyarthritis, (3) seronegative for ACPA and RF. (4)no radiologically evident erosions developed. The patients with seronegative RA met the EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria. The patients who were diagnosed with RS3PE at first and then diagnosed with seronegative RA afterward were included in seronegative RA group. The first analysis was performed on the affected joints, CRP, ESR, Hb, LDH, edema, the history of malignancy 2 years before and after the diagnosis, treatment, and the history of infection requiring hospitalization after the start of treatment. The affected joints were shoulders, elbows, wrists, finger joints (the MCP, and PIP joints), hips, knees, ankles, and toe joints (the MTP and PIP joints). The secondary analysis was performed on the above evaluations with a propensity score (PS) matching for age.Results:In the first analysis, 20 patients with RS3PE and 122 patients with seronegative RA were enrolled. The mean ages (RS3PE, seronegative RA) were 81.1, 67.4 years old. Females were 60.0%, 63.1%. The mean observation period was 25.4, 63.6 months. The proportion of affected joints were shoulders (25.0%, 42.6%), elbows (10.0%, 29.5%: p=0.06), wrists (85.0%, 73.8%), finger joints (80.0%, 95.1%: p=0.01), hips (0%, 9.8%), knees (40.0%, 37.7%), ankles (65.0%, 39.3%: p=0.03) and toe joints (40.0%, 32.8%). Edema at diganosis was observed in 100%, 17.21% (p <0.0001). The mean levels of the following blood tests at diagnosis were noted: CRP, 9.0 and 4.8 mg/dL (p=0.02); ESR, 87.6 and 60.7 mm/1h (p=0.003); Hb, 10.4 and 11.8 mg/dl (p=0.001); LDH, 198.3 and 177.9 U/L (p = 0.12); MMP-3, 742.5 and 633.8 ng/mL (p = 0.14). The proportion of patients with high LDH levels (>222 U/L) was 13.6% and 9.0% (p=0.0269). The proportion of patients having the history of malignancy was 20.0%, 8.2% (p=0.10). The patient treated with prednisolone as the initial treatment was 100% and 41.0%; the mean dose was 14.3 and 9.9 mg/d. After the start of treatment, the proportion of infection requiring hospitalization was 20.0 and 3.28% (p=0.002).In the secondary analysis with PS, 17 patients with RS3PE and 17 patients with seronegative RA were enrolled. The mean ages were 80.4, 78.9 years old. Females were 52.9, 76.4%. The affected joints with difference were elbows (11.8, 35.3%: p=0.10), wrists (82.4, 100%: p=0.06), and finger joints (82.4, 100%: p=0.06). The mean levels of Hb at diagnosis was 10.4, 11.4 mg/dL (p=0.01). The proportion of patients having the history of malignancy was 23.5% and 0% (p=0.03). After the start of treatment, the proportion of infection requiring hospitalization was 23.5% and 0% (p=0.03).Conclusion:When the ankles are affected and edema is observed, RS3PE is more likely than seronegative RA. RS3PE had higher levels of CRP, ESR, and LDH. The proportion of anemia was higher in RS3PE. The proportions of infection requiring hospitalization and the history of malignancy were higher in RS3PE.References:[1]McCarty DJ, O’Duffy JD et al. Remitting Seronegative Symmetrical Synovitis with Pitting Edema (RS3PE Syndrome). JAMA 1985; 254: 2763–2767. DOI:10.1001/jama.1985.03360190069027Disclosure of Interests:Misako Higashida-Konishi: None declared, Keisuke Izumi Grant/research support from: Asahi Kasei Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp, Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Satoshi Hama: None declared, Yutaro Hayashi: None declared, Yutaka Okano: None declared, Hisaji Oshima: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document