scholarly journals Psychosocial Competencies, Self-Efficacy and Performance of Nurses: A Comparative Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Urvashi Singh ◽  
Shalini Singh ◽  
Poonam
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Effective Communication ◽  
Hospital Nurses ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Psychosocial Competencies

A nurse is a healthcare professional who focuses on autonomous and collaborative care of individuals of all ages, families, groups and communities, sick or well and in all settings. Though nursing is both an art and science but it requires psychosocial competencies in staff members i.e. proper decision making, critical thinking, coping with emotions, interpersonal relationships and effective communication. This construct abreast with competencies plays an important role in enhancing their Self-Efficacy i.e. positive evaluation of oneself. When nurses have higher self-evaluation, it also leads to their better performance in this profession. But is this issue same in private and government hospitals? Taking this perspective in mind, the present study was designed to make a comparative study of psychosocial competencies, self-efficacy and performance in nurses. A sample of 100 head nurses (50 from government and 50 from private hospitals) belonging to an age group of 40-45 years having at least 5 year job experience of same set up was selected. Psychosocial Competence Scale (Anita & Vijayalaxmi, 2007), Self-Efficacy Scale (Raif & Jerusalem, 1995) and Nursing Performance Scale (Ward & Felter, 1979) were administered to measure these variables. The results revealed that private hospital nurses scored high on psychosocial competencies, i.e. effective communication, decision making, empathy and critical thinking and also had better self-efficacy and performance as well than government hospital nurses.

Enhancing Critical Thinking Through “Independent Design Decision Making” in the Studio

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Mallika Bose ◽  
Eliza Pennypacker ◽  
Thomas Yahner
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Landscape Architecture ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Design Decisions ◽  
Independent Design ◽  
Design Ideas

A group of faculty at Penn State's Department of Landscape Architecture observed that the traditional master/apprentice model of studio instruction fosters greater student dependence on faculty for decision-making guidance than the faculty considers desirable. They contend that this traditional model promotes a studio dynamic that encourages students to look to the professor for design ideas and wait for faculty approval before making design decisions. The faculty considered this decision-making dependency to be in conflict with the need for students to develop the critical-thinking skills required to address the complex and ill-structured problems that are common in architecture and landscape architecture. In response to their concern this faculty team developed a studio teaching method they termed “independent design decision-making.” They speculated that by transferring the responsibility for design decisions from professor to the student, students could improve their critical thinking and gain confidence in design decision-making. The faculty conceived a set of strategies to implement in a 3rd year team-taught site planning and design studio that presents a range of complex design issues and scales. In collaboration with Penn State's Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence, the faculty researchers developed a 2-year comparative study to test this new teaching method in the same design studio with two consecutive student groups-evaluating the strategies implemented in the first year, refining methods, then applying and re-evaluating the results in the next year's class. These new strategies included ways students receive information to inspire their designs (“input strategies”) and ways to receive critique on their design ideas (“feedback strategies”). Two evaluation instruments were chosen to assess this method of studio teaching: 1) the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), and 2) Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG). This paper presents this teaching/learning method and reports on the results of the comparative study.

scholarly journals Relação entre a autoeficácia e os estágios do processo decisório: análise da percepção dos futuros administradores

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 792-807
Author(s):  
Atais Catarina Karpinski ◽  
Dieli Cristina Cogo ◽  
Ricardo Adriano Antonelli ◽  
Alison Martins Meurer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – This study analyzes the relationship between self-efficacy and the stages of the decision-making process, based on the perception of the undergraduate students in bachelor degree in Business Administration.Design/methodology/approach – It characterizes as a descriptive research, with a quantitative approach, using the Structural Equation Modeling technique, and data collection performed through a survey.Findings – The results indicate an association between self-efficacy and the stages of the decision-making process, allowing partial acceptance of the research hypothesis. In this sense, Effectiveness towards Adversity and Social Efficacy are shown as elements to be observed in terms of developing skills, which enable the students to realize such constructs, since there is a significant relationship with behavior in the decision making process. Thus, self-efficacy is presented as a propeller of the individual's confidence in the challenges and experiences with interpersonal relationships, whose experience supports the cognitive process which enables the recognition of the situation and the actions to be developed. Moreover, it is worth noticing the relevance of considering behavioral aspects in decision-making studies; regarding to, as well, the current discussions about the limitations of rational decision models.Research limitations/implications – The cross-section time frame and the sample composition of academics at a university are limitations that can be overcome in the future.Originality/value - Analyzing the relationship of self-efficacy with the stages of the decision-making process becomes relevant, since it brings contributions on the relationship of subjective abilities with decision making, in order to highlight characteristics not covered by rational decision-making models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document