scholarly journals Development of Simple Methods of DNA Extraction from Environmental Samples for Monitoring Microbial Community Based on PCR.

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAZUNARI SEI ◽  
KEN-ICHIRO ASANO ◽  
NAOHIRO TATEISHI ◽  
KAZUHIRO MORI ◽  
MICHIHIKO IKE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Community ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Community Based

scholarly journals Community-based geographical distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans VNTR-genotypes from the environment and humans in the Nyong valley, Cameroon

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Zeukeng ◽  
Anthony Ablordey ◽  
Solange E. Kakou-Ngazoa ◽  
Stephen Mbigha Ghogomu ◽  
David N’golo Coulibaly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Buruli Ulcer ◽  
Variable Number ◽  
Mycobacterium Ulcerans ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Human Samples ◽  
Route Of Transmission ◽  
Mode Of Transmission ◽  
Animal Reservoirs

Abstract Background Genotyping is a powerful tool for investigating outbreaks of infectious diseases and it can provide useful information such as identifying the source and route of transmission, and circulating strains involved in the outbreak. Genotyping techniques based on variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) are instrumental in detecting heterogeneity in Mycobacterium ulcerans (MU) and also for discriminating MU from other mycobacteria species. Here, we describe and map the distribution of MU genotypes in Buruli ulcer (BU) endemic communities of the Nyong valley in Cameroon. We also tested the hypothesis of whether the suspected animal reservoirs of BU that share the human microhabitat are shedding contaminated fecal matters and saliva into their surrounding environments. Methods Environmental samples from suspected MU-risk factors and lesion swabs from human patients were sampled in BU-endemic communities and tested for the presence of MU by qPCR targeting three independent sequences (IS2404, IS2606, KR-B). Positive samples to MU were further genotyped by VNTR with confirmation by sequencing of four loci (MIRU1, Locus 6, ST1, Locus 19). Results MU was detected in environmental samples including water bodies (23%), biofilms (14%), detritus (10%), and in human patients (73%). MU genotypes D, W, and C were found both in environmental and human samples. The micro geo-distribution of MU genotypes from communities showed that genotype D is found both in environmental and human samples, while genotypes W and C are specific to environmental samples and human lesions, respectively. No obvious focal grouping of MU genotypes was observed at the community scale. An additional survey in the human microhabitat suggests that domestic and wild animals do not shed MU in their saliva and feces in sampled communities. Conclusions VNTR typing uncovered different MU genotypes circulating in the endemic communities of the Akonolinga district. A MU environmental genotype was found in patients, yet the mechanism of contamination remains to be investigated; and recovering MU in culture from the environment remains key priority to enable a better understanding of the mode of transmission of BU. We also conclude that excretions from suspected animals are unlikely to be major sources of MU in the Nyong Valley in Cameroon.

scholarly journals Validating DNA Extraction Protocols for Bentonite Clay

mSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Engel ◽  
Sara Coyotzi ◽  
Melody A. Vachon ◽  
Jennifer R. McKelvie ◽  
Josh D. Neufeld
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Community ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Bentonite Clay ◽  
Dna Recovery ◽  
Blocking Agents ◽  
Clay Matrix ◽  
Microbial Dna

ABSTRACT Bentonite clay is an integral component of the engineered barrier system of deep geological repositories (DGRs) that are planned for the long-term storage of high-level radioactive waste. Although nucleic acid extraction and analysis can provide powerful qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the presence, abundance, and functional potential of microorganisms within DGR materials, extraction of microbial DNA from bentonite clay is challenging due to the low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acids to the charged clay matrix. In this study, we used quantitative PCR, gel fingerprinting, and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons to assess DNA extraction efficiency from natural MX-80 bentonite and the same material “spiked” with Escherichia coli genomic DNA. Extraction protocols were tested without additives and with casein and phosphate as blocking agents. Although we demonstrate improved DNA recovery by blocking agents at relatively high DNA spiking concentrations, at relatively low spiking concentrations, we detected a high proportion of contaminant nucleic acids from blocking agents that masked sample-specific microbial profile data. Because bacterial genomic DNA associated with casein preparations was insufficiently removed by UV treatment, casein is not recommended as an additive for DNA extractions from low-biomass samples. Instead, we recommend a kit-based extraction protocol for bentonite clay without additional blocking agents, as tested here and validated with multiple MX-80 bentonite samples, ensuring relatively high DNA recoveries with minimal contamination. IMPORTANCE Extraction of microbial DNA from MX-80 bentonite is challenging due to low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acid molecules to the charged clay matrix. Blocking agents improve DNA recovery, but their impact on microbial community profiles from low-biomass samples has not been characterized well. In this study, we evaluated the effect of casein and phosphate as blocking agents for quantitative recovery of nucleic acids from MX-80 bentonite. Our data justify a simplified framework for analyzing microbial community DNA associated with swelling MX-80 bentonite samples within the context of a deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel. This study is among the first to demonstrate successful extraction of DNA from Wyoming MX-80 bentonite.

Microbial community-based protein production from wastewater for animal feed applications

2021 ◽  
pp. 125723
Author(s):  
Ramanujam Srinivasan Vethathirri ◽  
Ezequiel Santillan ◽  
Stefan Wuertz
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Community ◽  
Protein Production ◽  
Animal Feed ◽  
Community Based

scholarly journals Detection of Bacteria in Environmental Samples by Direct PCR Without DNA Extraction

BioTechniques ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Fode-Vaughan ◽  
Charles F. Wimpee ◽  
Charles C. Remsen ◽  
Mary Lynne Perille Collins
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Direct Pcr

Extracellular DNA in environmental samples: Occurrence, extraction, quantification, and impact on microbial biodiversity assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sakcham Bairoliya ◽  
Jonas Koh Zhi Xiang ◽  
Bin Cao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequencing ◽  
Microbial Communities ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Extracellular Dna ◽  
Biodiversity Assessment ◽  
Microbial Biodiversity ◽  
Technical Details ◽  
The Impact

Environmental DNA, i.e., DNA directly extracted from environmental samples, has been applied to understand microbial communities in the environments and to monitor contemporary biodiversity in the conservation context. Environmental DNA often contains both intracellular DNA (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (eDNA). eDNA can persist in the environment and complicate environmental DNA sequencing-based analyses of microbial communities and biodiversity. Although several studies acknowledged the impact of eDNA on DNA-based profiling of environmental communities, eDNA is still being neglected or ignored in most studies dealing with environmental samples. In this article, we summarize key findings on eDNA in environmental samples and discuss the methods used to extract and quantify eDNA as well as the importance of eDNA on the interpretation of experimental results. We then suggest several factors to consider when designing experiments and analyzing data to negate or determine the contribution of eDNA to environmental DNA-based community analyses. This field of research will be driven forward by: (i) carefully designing environmental DNA extraction pipelines by taking into consideration technical details in methods for eDNA extraction/removal and membrane-based filtration and concentration; (ii) quantifying eDNA in extracted environmental DNA using multiple methods including qPCR and fluorescent DNA binding dyes; (iii) carefully interpretating effect of eDNA on DNA-based community analyses at different taxonomic levels; and (iv) when possible, removing eDNA from environmental samples for DNA-based community analyses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document