scholarly journals Constraints on Moho Depth and Crustal Thickness in the Liguro-Provençal Basin from a 3d Gravity Inversion : Geodynamic Implications

1997 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Gaulier ◽  
N. Chamot-Rooke ◽  
F. Jestin
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Thickness ◽  
Moho Depth ◽  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
3D Gravity

scholarly journals Moho Geometry of the Okinawa Trough Based on Gravity Inversion and Its Implications on the Crustal Nature and Tectonic Evolution

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Xiwu Luan
Keyword(s):  
Early Stage ◽  
Okinawa Trough ◽  
High Heat ◽  
Crustal Thickness ◽  
Moho Depth ◽  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
The Okinawa Trough ◽  
Oceanic Spreading ◽  
Thickness Variations ◽  
Back Arc

The Okinawa Trough (OT) is an incipient back-arc basin, but its crustal nature is still controversial. Gravity inversion along with sediment and lithospheric mantle density modeling are used to map the regional Moho depth and crustal thickness variations of the OT and its adjacent areas. The gravity inversion result shows that the crustal thicknesses are 17–22 km at the northern OT, 11–19 km at the central OT, and 7–19 km at the southern OT. Because of the crust with a thickness larger than 17 km, the slow southward arc movement, and scarce contemporaneous volcanisms, the northern OT should be in the stage of early back-arc extension. All of the moderate crustal thickness, high heat flow, and intense volcanism at the central OT indicate that this region is probably in the transitional stage from the back-arc rifting to the oceanic spreading. A crust that is only 7 km thick, lithosphere strength as low as the mid-ocean ridge, and MORB-similar basalts at the southern OT demonstrate that the southern OT is at the early stage of seafloor spreading.

scholarly journals Crustal structure of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton revealed by inverse and forward gravity modeling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Ognev ◽  
Jörg Ebbing ◽  
Peter Haas
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Lower Crust ◽  
Crustal Thickness ◽  
Moho Depth ◽  
Gravity Modeling ◽  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
Ural Mountains ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Crustal Model

Abstract. Volgo-Uralia is a Neoarchean easternmost part of the East European craton. Recent seismic studies of the Volgo-Uralian region provided new insights into the crustal structure of this area. In this study, we combine satellite gravity and seismic data in a common workflow to perform a complex study of Volgo-Uralian crustal structure which is useful for further basin analysis of the area. In this light, a new crustal model of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton is presented from a step-wise approach: (1) inverse gravity modeling followed by (2) 3D forward gravity modeling. First, inversion of satellite gravity gradient data was applied to determine the Moho depth for the area. Density contrasts between crust and mantle were varied laterally according to the tectonic units present in the region, and the model is constrained by the available active seismic data. The Moho discontinuity obtained from the gravity inversion was consequently modified and complemented in order to define a complete 3D crustal model by adding information on the sedimentary cover, upper crust, lower crust, and lithospheric mantle layers in the process of forward gravity modeling where both seismic and gravity constraints were respected. The obtained model shows crustal thickness variations from 32 to more than 55 km in certain areas. The thinnest crust with a thickness below 40 km is found beneath the Pericaspian basin, which is covered by a thick sedimentary layer. The thickest crust is located underneath the Ural Mountains as well as in the center of the Volga-Uralian subcraton. In both areas the crustal thickness exceeds 50 km. At the same time, initial forward gravity modeling has shown a gravity misfit of ca. 95 mGal between the measured Bouguer gravity anomaly and the forward calculated gravity field in the central area of the Volga-Uralian subcraton. This misfit was interpreted and modeled as a high-density lower crust which possibly represents underplated material. Our preferred crustal model of the Volga-Uralian subcraton respects the gravity and seismic constraints and reflects the main geological features of the region with Moho thickening in the cratons and under the Ural Mountains and thinning along the Paleoproterozoic rifts, Pericaspian sedimentary basin, and Pre-Urals foredeep.

ArcCRUST: Arctic Crustal Thickness From 3‐D Gravity Inversion

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 3225-3247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Lebedeva‐Ivanova ◽  
Carmen Gaina ◽  
Alexander Minakov ◽  
Sergey Kashubin
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Thickness ◽  
Gravity Inversion

Numerical modeling and 3D-gravity inversion of the Vargeão impact structure formed in a mixed basalt/sandstone target, Paraná Basin, Brazil

2021 ◽  
pp. 103396
Author(s):  
Laian de Moura Silva ◽  
Marcos Alberto Rodrigues Vasconcelos ◽  
Vinamra Agrawal ◽  
Alvaro Penteado Crósta ◽  
Emilson Pereira Leite
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Modeling ◽  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
Impact Structure ◽  
Paraná Basin ◽  
3D Gravity ◽  
Parana Basin

scholarly journals Subsurface modelling of Kei Kecil Island with 3D gravity inversion

2021 ◽  
Vol 1918 (2) ◽  
pp. 022033
Author(s):  
Supriyadi ◽  
E Wijanarko ◽  
Khumaedi
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
3D Gravity

3D gravity inversion constrained by stereotomography

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Panzner ◽  
Jörg Ebbing ◽  
Michael Jordan
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
3D Gravity

Integration of gravity, magnetic, and seismic data for subsalt modeling in the Northern Red Sea

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. T507-T521
Author(s):  
Camille Le Magoarou ◽  
Katja Hirsch ◽  
Clement Fleury ◽  
Remy Martin ◽  
Johana Ramirez-Bernal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Red Sea ◽  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Gravity Inversion ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic ◽  
3D Gravity ◽  
Thin Crust ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic Data ◽  
Refraction Data ◽  
Northern Red Sea

Rifts and rifted passive margins are often associated with thick evaporite layers, which challenge seismic reflection imaging in the subsalt domain. This makes understanding the basin evolution and crustal architecture difficult. An integrative, multidisciplinary workflow has been developed using the exploration well, gravity and magnetics data, together with seismic reflection and refraction data sets to build a comprehensive 3D subsurface model of the Egyptian Red Sea. Using a 2D iterative workflow first, we have constructed cross sections using the available well penetrations and seismic refraction data as preliminary constraints. The 2D forward model uses regional gravity and magnetic data to investigate the regional crustal structure. The final models are refined using enhanced gravity and magnetic data and geologic interpretations. This process reduces uncertainties in basement interpretation and magmatic body identification. Euler depth estimates are used to point out the edges of high-susceptibility bodies. We achieved further refinement by initiating a 3D gravity inversion. The resultant 3D gravity model increases precision in crustal geometries and lateral density variations within the crust and the presalt sediments. Along the Egyptian margin, where data inputs are more robust, basement lows are observed and interpreted as basins. Basement lows correspond with thin crust ([Formula: see text]), indicating that the evolution of these basins is closely related to the thinning or necking process. In fact, the Egyptian Northern Red Sea is typified by dramatic crustal thinning or necking that is occurring over very short distances of approximately 30 km, very proximal to the present-day coastline. The integrated 2D and 3D modeling reveals the presence of high-density magnetic bodies that are located along the margin. The location of the present-day Zabargad transform fault zone is very well delineated in the computed crustal thickness maps, suggesting that it is associated with thin crust and shallow mantle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document