Double Wall Cooling of an Effusion Plate with Cross Flow and Impingement Jet Combination Internal Cooling: Comparisons of Main Flow Contraction Ratio Effects

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Click ◽  
David Ritchie ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
Rajeshriben Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Internal Cooling ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Double Wall

Double Wall Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Plate With Cross Flow Supply Cooling and Main Flow Pressure Gradient

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Allgaier ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Cold Side ◽  
Flow Area ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Double Wall

Experimentally measured results are presented for different experimental conditions for a test plate with double wall cooling, comprised of full-coverage effusion-cooling on the hot-side of the plate, and cross-flow cooling on the cold-side of the plate. The results presented are different from those from past investigations, because of the addition of a significant mainstream pressure gradient. Main stream flow is provided along a passage with a contraction ratio of 4, given by the ratio upstream flow area, to downstream flow area. With this arrangement, local blowing ratio decreases significantly with streamwise development along the test section, for every value of initial blowing ratio considered, where this initial value is determined at the most upstream row of effusion holes. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array. The experimental results are provided for mainstream Reynolds numbers of 128400 to 135300, and initial blowing ratios of 3.6, 4.4, 5.2, 6.1–6.3, and 7.3–7.4. Results illustrate the effects of blowing ratio for the hot-side and the cold-side of the effusion plate. Of particular interest are values of line-averaged film cooling effectiveness and line-averaged heat transfer coefficient, which are generally different for contraction ratio of 4, compared to a contraction ratio of 1, because of different amounts and concentrations of effusion coolant near the test surface. In regard to cold-side measurements on the crossflow side of the effusion plate, line-averaged Nusselt numbers for contraction ratio 4 are often less than values for contraction ratio 1, when compared at the same main flow Reynolds number, initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location.

Double Wall Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Plate With Cross Flow Supply Cooling and Main Flow Pressure Gradient

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
Christopher Allgaier ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Cold Side ◽  
Flow Area ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Double Wall

Experimentally measured results are presented for different experimental conditions for a test plate with double wall cooling, composed of full-coverage effusion-cooling on the hot side of the plate, and cross-flow cooling on the cold side of the plate. The results presented are different from those from past investigations, because of the addition of a significant mainstream pressure gradient. Main stream flow is provided along a passage with a contraction ratio of 4, given by the ratio upstream flow area, to downstream flow area. With this arrangement, local blowing ratio decreases significantly with streamwise development along the test section, for every value of initial blowing ratio considered, where this initial value is determined at the most upstream row of effusion holes. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array. The experimental results are provided for mainstream Reynolds numbers of 92,400–96,600, and from 128,400 to 135,000, and initial blowing ratios of 3.3–3.6, 4.4, 5.2, 6.1–6.3, and 7.3–7.4. Results illustrate the effects of blowing ratio for the hot side and the cold side of the effusion plate. Of particular interest are values of line-averaged film cooling effectiveness and line-averaged heat transfer coefficient, which are generally different for contraction ratio of 4, compared to a contraction ratio of 1, because of different amounts and concentrations of effusion coolant near the test surface. In regard to cold-side measurements on the crossflow side of the effusion plate, line-averaged Nusselt numbers for contraction ratio 4 are often less than values for contraction ratio 1, when compared at the same main flow Reynolds number, initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location.

Double Wall Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Plate With Main Flow Pressure Gradient, Including Internal Impingement Array Cooling

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Austin J. Click ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Spatially Resolved ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Effusion Hole

The present study provides new effusion cooling data for both surfaces of full coverage effusion cooling plate. For the effusion cooled surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, and surface heat transfer coefficients (measured using transient techniques and infrared thermography). For the impingement cooled surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface Nusselt numbers (measured using steady-state liquid crystal thermography). To produce this cool side augmentation, impingement jet arrays at different jet Reynolds numbers, from 2720 to 11100, are employed. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array, with spanwise and streamwise impingement hole spacing such that coolant jet hole centerlines are located midway between individual effusion hole entrances. Considered are initial effusion blowing ratios from 3.3 to 7.5, with subsonic, incompressible flow. The velocity of the freestream flow which is adjacent to the effusion cooled boundary layer is increasing with streamwise distance, due to a favorable streamwise pressure gradient. Such variations are provided by a main flow passage contraction ratio CR of 4. Of particular interest are effects of impingement jet Reynolds number, effusion blowing ratio, and streamwise development. Also included are comparisons of impingement jet array cooling results with: (i) results associated with cross flow supply cooling with CR = 1 and CR = 4, and (ii) results associated with impingement supply cooling with CR = 1, when the mainstream pressure gradient is near zero. Overall, the present results show that, for the same main flow Reynolds number, approximate initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location, significantly increased thermal protection is generally provided when the effusion coolant is provided by an array of impingement cooling jets, compared to a cross flow coolant supply.

Double Wall Cooling of an Effusion Plate With Simultaneous Cross Flow and Impingement Jet Array Internal Cooling

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ritchie ◽  
Austin Click ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
Rajeshriben Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Stream Flow ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Streamwise Location ◽  
Net Heat Flux ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Double Wall

Considered is double wall cooling, with full-coverage effusion-cooling on the hot side of the effusion plate, and a combination of impingement cooling and cross flow cooling, employed together on the cold side of the effusion plate. Data are given for a main stream flow passage with a contraction ratio (CR) of 4 for main stream Reynolds numbers Rems and Rems,avg of 157,000–161,000 and 233,000–244,000, respectively. Hot-side measurements (on the main stream flow or hot side of the effusion plate) are presented, which are measured using infrared thermography. Using a transient thermal measurement approach, measured are spatially resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, and surface heat transfer coefficient. For the same Reynolds number, initial blowing ratio (BR), and streamwise location, increased thermal protection is often provided when the effusion coolant is provided by the cross flow/impingement combination configuration, compared to the cross flow only supply arrangement. In general, higher adiabatic effectiveness values are provided by the impingement only arrangement, relative to the impingement/cross flow combination configuration, when compared at the same Reynolds number, initial BR, and x/de location. Data for one streamwise location of x/de = 60 show that the highest net heat flux reduction line-averaged net heat flux reduction (NHFR) values are produced either by the impingement/cross flow combination configuration or by the impingement only arrangement, depending upon the particular magnitude of BR, which is considered.

Double Wall Cooling of a Full-Coverage Effusion Plate With Main Flow Pressure Gradient, Including Internal Impingement Array Cooling

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
David Ritchie ◽  
Austin Click ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Hole Array ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Spatially Resolved ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Effusion Hole

The present study provides new effusion cooling data for both the surfaces of the full-coverage effusion cooling plate. For the effusion-cooled surface, presented are spatially resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and surface heat transfer coefficients (measured using transient techniques and infrared thermography). For the impingement-cooled surface, presented are spatially resolved distributions of surface Nusselt numbers (measured using steady-state liquid crystal thermography). To produce this cool-side augmentation, impingement jet arrays at different jet Reynolds numbers, from 2720 to 11,100, are employed. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array, with spanwise and streamwise impingement hole spacing such that coolant jet hole centerlines are located midway between individual effusion hole entrances. Considered are the initial effusion blowing ratios from 3.3 to 7.5, with subsonic, incompressible flow. The velocity of the freestream flow which is adjacent to the effusion-cooled boundary layer is increasing with streamwise distance, due to a favorable streamwise pressure gradient. Such variations are provided by a main flow passage contraction ratio CR of 4. Of particular interest are effects of impingement jet Reynolds number, effusion blowing ratio, and streamwise development. Also, included are comparisons of impingement jet array cooling results with: (i) results associated with crossflow supply cooling with CR = 1 and CR = 4 and (ii) results associated with impingement supply cooling with CR = 1, when the mainstream pressure gradient is near zero. Overall, the present results show that, for the same main flow Reynolds number, approximate initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location, significantly increased thermal protection is generally provided when the effusion coolant is provided by an array of impingement cooling jets, compared to a crossflow coolant supply.

Effects of alternating elliptical chamber on jet impingement heat transfer in vane leading edge under different cross-flow conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
K. Xiao ◽  
J. He ◽  
Z. Feng
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Longitudinal Vortices ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Cross Flow Velocity ◽  
The Cross

ABSTRACT This paper proposes an alternating elliptical impingement chamber in the leading edge of a gas turbine to restrain the cross flow and enhance the heat transfer, and investigates the detailed flow and heat transfer characteristics. The chamber consists of straight sections and transition sections. Numerical simulations are performed by solving the three-dimensional (3D) steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) k– $\omega$ turbulence model. The influences of alternating the cross section on the impingement flow and heat transfer of the chamber are studied by comparison with a smooth semi-elliptical impingement chamber at a cross-flow Velocity Ratio (VR) of 0.2 and Temperature Ratio (TR) of 1.00 in the primary study. Then, the effects of the cross-flow VR and TR are further investigated. The results reveal that, in the semi-elliptical impingement chamber, the impingement jet is deflected by the cross flow and the heat transfer performance is degraded. However, in the alternating elliptical chamber, the cross flow is transformed to a pair of longitudinal vortices, and the flow direction at the centre of the cross section is parallel to the impingement jet, thus improving the jet penetration ability and enhancing the impingement heat transfer. In addition, the heat transfer in the semi-elliptical chamber degrades rapidly away from the stagnation region, while the longitudinal vortices enhance the heat transfer further, making the heat transfer coefficient distribution more uniform. The Nusselt number decreases with increase of VR and TR for both the semi-elliptical chamber and the alternating elliptical chamber. The alternating elliptical chamber enhances the heat transfer and moves the stagnation point up for all VR and TR, and the heat transfer enhancement is more obvious at high cross-flow velocity ratio.

Experimental and Numerical Study on the Effects of the Relative Position of Film Hole and Orientation Ribs on the Film Cooling With Ribbed Cross-Flow Coolant Channel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingran Li ◽  
Cunliang Liu ◽  
Lin Ye ◽  
Huiren Zhu ◽  
Fan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Relative Position ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Internal Cooling ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Cooling Performance ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Numerical Studies

Abstract To investigate the application of ribbed cross-flow coolant channels with film hole effusion and the effects of the internal cooling configuration on film cooling, experimental and numerical studies are conducted on the effect of the relative position of the film holes and different orientation ribs on the film cooling performance. Three cases of the relative position of the film holes and different orientation ribs (post-rib, centered, and pre-rib) in two ribbed cross-flow channels (135° and 45° orientation ribs) are investigated. The film cooling performances are measured under three blowing ratios by the transient liquid crystal measurement technique. A RANS simulation with the realizable k-ε turbulence model and enhanced wall treatment is performed. The results show that the cooling effectiveness and the downstream heat transfer coefficient for the 135° rib are basically the same in the three position cases, and the differences between the local effectiveness average values for the three are no more than 0.04. The differences between the heat transfer coefficients are no more than 0.1. The “pre-rib” and “centered” cases are studied for the 45° rib, and the position of the structures has little effect on the film cooling performance. In the different position cases, the outlet velocity distribution of the film holes, the jet pattern and the discharge coefficient are consistent with the variation in the cross flow. The related research previously published by the authors showed that the inclination of the ribs with respect to the holes affects the film cooling performance. This study reveals that the relative positions of the ribs and holes have little effect on the film cooling performance. This paper expands and improves the study of the effect of the internal cooling configuration on film cooling and makes a significant contribution to the design and industrial application of the internal cooling channel of a turbine blade.

Effects of Double Wall Cooling Configuration and Conditions on Performance of Full-Coverage Effusion Cooling

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Rogers ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Warren Buzzard ◽  
Brian Sweeney ◽  
Nathan Tinker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Hole Array ◽  
Adiabatic Wall ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Double Wall

Experimental results are presented for a double wall cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a combustor liner of a gas turbine engine. The results are collected using a new experimental facility designed to test full-coverage film cooling and impingement cooling effectiveness using either cross flow, impingement, or a combination of both to supply the film cooling flow. The present experiment primarily deals with cross flow supplied full-coverage film cooling for a sparse film cooling hole array that has not been previously tested. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratio of 1, blowing ratios ranging from 2.7 to 7.5, coolant Reynolds numbers based on film cooling hole diameter of about 5000–20,000, and mainstream temperature step during transient tests of 14 °C. The film cooling hole array consists of a film cooling hole diameter of 6.4 mm with nondimensional streamwise (X/de) and spanwise (Y/de) film cooling hole spacing of 15 and 4, respectively. The film cooling holes are streamwise inclined at an angle of 25 deg with respect to the test plate surface and have adjacent streamwise rows staggered with respect to each other. Data illustrating the effects of blowing ratio on adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient are presented. For the arrangement and conditions considered, heat transfer coefficients generally increase with streamwise development and increase with increasing blowing ratio. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness is determined from measurements of adiabatic wall temperature, coolant stagnation temperature, and mainstream recovery temperature. The adiabatic wall temperature and the adiabatic film cooling effectiveness generally decrease and increase, respectively, with streamwise position, and generally decrease and increase, respectively, as blowing ratio becomes larger.

Computational analysis of span-wise hole locations on fluid flow and film cooling of internal channels with crescent ribs

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 2728-2753
Author(s):  
Guohua Zhang ◽  
Xueting Liu ◽  
Bengt Ake Sundén ◽  
Gongnan Xie
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Side Wall ◽  
Target Surface ◽  
Internal Cooling ◽  
Cooling Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Cooling Air

Purpose This study aims to clarify the mechanism of film hole location at the span-wise direction of an internal cooling channel with crescent ribs on the adiabatic film cooling performance, three configurations are designed to observe the effects of the distance between the center of the ellipse and the side wall(Case 1, l = w/2, Case 2, l = w/3 and for Case 3, l = w/4). Design/methodology/approach Numerical simulations are conducted under two blowing ratios (i.e. 0.5 and 1) and a fixed cross-flow Reynolds number (Rec = 100,000) with a verified turbulence model. Findings It is shown that at low blowing ratio, reducing the distance increases the film cooling effectiveness but keeps the trend of the effectiveness unchanged, while at high blowing ratio, the characteristic is a little bit different in the range of 0 = x/D = 10. Research limitations/implications These features could be explained by the fact that shrinking the distance between the hole and side wall induces a much smaller reserved region and vortex downstream the ribs and a lower resistance for cooling air entering the film hole. Furthermore, the spiral flow inside the hole is impaired. Originality/value As a result, the kidney-shaped vortices originating from the jet flow are weakened, and the target surface can be well covered, resulting in an enhancement of the adiabatic film cooling performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document