scholarly journals Direct Calculation of RANS Model Parameters from Jet-in-Crossflow PIV Data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan E. Miller ◽  
Steven J. Beresh ◽  
Matthew F. Barone
Keyword(s):  
Direct Calculation ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Rans Model ◽  
Jet In Crossflow

scholarly journals Robust Bayesian Calibration of a RANS Model for Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaideep Ray ◽  
Sophia Lefantzi ◽  
Srinivasan Arunajatesan ◽  
Lawrence J. DeChant
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Calibration ◽  
Rans Model ◽  
Jet In Crossflow

Validation of calibrated k-ε model parameters for jet-in-crossflow

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan E. Miller ◽  
Steven J. Beresh ◽  
Jaideep Ray
Keyword(s):  
Model Parameters ◽  
Jet In Crossflow

Merging Near-Wall RANS Models With LES for Separating and Reattaching Flows

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suad Jakirlic´ ◽  
Bjo¨rn Kniesner ◽  
Sanjin Sˇaric´ ◽  
Kemal Hanjalic´
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Equation Model ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Rans Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Moderate Reynolds Number ◽  
Near Wall

A method of coupling a low-Reynolds-number k–ε RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes) model with Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) in a two-layer Hybrid LES/RANS (HLR) scheme is proposed in the present work. The RANS model covers the near-wall region and the LES model the remainder of the flow domain. Two different subgrid-scale (SGS) models in LES were considered, the Smagorinsky model and the one-equation model for the residual kinetic energy (Yoshizawa and Horiuti, 1985), combined with two versions of the RANS ε equation, one governing the “isotropic” (ε˜; Chien, 1982) and the other the “homogeneous” dissipation rate (εh; Jakirlic and Hanjalic, 2002). Both fixed and self-adjusting interface locations were considered. The exchange of the variables across the interface was adjusted by smoothing the turbulence viscosity either by adjusting the RANS model parameters, such as Cμ (Temmerman et al., 2005), or by applying an additional forcing at the interface using a method of digital-filter-based generation of inflow data for spatially developing DNS and LES due to Klein et al. (2003). The feasibility of the method was illustrated against the available DNS, fine- and coarse grid LES, DES (Detached Eddy Simulation) and experiments in turbulent flow over a backward-facing step at a low (Yoshioka et al., 2001) and a high Re number (Vogel and Eaton, 1985), periodic flow over a series of 2-D hills (Fro¨hlich et al., 2005) and in a high-Re flow over a 2-D, wall-mounted hump (Greenblat et al, 2004). Prior to these computations, the method was validated in a fully-developed channel flow at a moderate Reynolds number Rem ≈ 24000 (Abe et al., 2004).

A Numerical Study on the Turbulent Schmidt Numbers in a Jet in Crossflow

2012 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizaveta M. Ivanova ◽  
Berthold E. Noll ◽  
Manfred Aigner
Keyword(s):  
Schmidt Number ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Scalar Fields ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Rans Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Jet In Crossflow ◽  
Turbulent Schmidt Number ◽  
Optimal Value ◽  
Schmidt Numbers

This work presents a numerical study on the turbulent Schmidt numbers in jets in crossflow. This study contains two main parts. In the first part, the problem of the proper choice of the turbulent Schmidt number in the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) jet in crossflow mixing simulations is outlined. The results of RANS employing the shear-stress transport (SST) model of Menter and its curvature correction modification and different turbulent Schmidt number values are validated against experimental data. The dependence of the optimal value of the turbulent Schmidt number on the dynamic RANS model is studied. Furthermore, a comparison is made with the large-eddy simulation (LES) results obtained using the wall-adapted local eddy viscosity (WALE) model. The accuracy given by LES is superior in comparison to RANS results. This leads to the second part of the current study, in which the time-averaged mean and fluctuating velocity and scalar fields from LES are used for the evaluation of the turbulent viscosities, turbulent scalar diffusivities, and the turbulent Schmidt numbers in a jet in crossflow configuration. The values obtained from the LES data are compared with those given by the RANS modeling. The deviations are discussed, and the possible ways for the RANS model improvements are outlined.

A Numerical Study on the Turbulent Schmidt Numbers in a Jet in Crossflow

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Ivanova ◽  
Berthold Noll ◽  
Manfred Aigner
Keyword(s):  
Schmidt Number ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Scalar Fields ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Rans Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
Jet In Crossflow ◽  
Turbulent Schmidt Number ◽  
Schmidt Numbers

This work presents a numerical study on the turbulent Schmidt numbers in jets in crossflow. This study contains two main parts. In the first part the problem of the proper choice of the turbulent Schmidt number in the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) jet in crossflow mixing simulations is outlined. The results of RANS employing the shear-stress transport (SST) model of Menter and its curvature correction modification and different turbulent Schmidt number values are validated against experimental data. The dependence of the “optimal” value of the turbulent Schmidt number on the dynamic RANS model is studied. Furthermore a comparison is made with the large-eddy simulation (LES) results obtained using the WALE (Wall-Adapted Local Eddy Viscosity) model. The accuracy given by LES is superior in comparison to RANS results. This leads to the second part of the current study, in which the time-averaged mean and fluctuating velocity and scalar fields from LES are used for the evaluation of the turbulent viscosities, turbulent scalar diffusivities, and the turbulent Schmidt numbers in a jet in crossflow configuration. The values obtained from the LES data are compared with those given by the RANS modeling. The deviations are discussed and the possible ways for the RANS model improvements are outlined.

Instrumental and Ideological Union Commitment: Longitudinal Assessment of Construct Validity

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Sjöberg ◽  
Magnus Sverke
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Longitudinal Assessment ◽  
Union Commitment ◽  
Union Participation

Summary: Previous research has identified instrumentality and ideology as important aspects of member attachment to labor unions. The present study evaluated the construct validity of a scale designed to reflect the two dimensions of instrumental and ideological union commitment using a sample of 1170 Swedish blue-collar union members. Longitudinal data were used to test seven propositions referring to the dimensionality, internal consistency reliability, and temporal stability of the scale as well as postulated group differences in union participation to which the scale should be sensitive. Support for the hypothesized factor structure of the scale and for adequate reliabilities of the dimensions was obtained and was also replicated 18 months later. Tests for equality of measurement model parameters and test-retest correlations indicated support for the temporal stability of the scale. In addition, the results were consistent with most of the predicted differences between groups characterized by different patterns of change/stability in union participation status. The study provides strong support for the construct validity of the scale and indicates that it can be used in future theory testing on instrumental and ideological union commitment.

Representation of bolted joints in a structure using finite element modelling and model updating

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 7141-7151 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Omar ◽  
M. N. Abdul Rani ◽  
M. A. Yunus
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Dynamic Behaviour ◽  
Model Updating ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Bolted Joints ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Bolted Joint ◽  
Fe Modelling ◽  
Joint Structure

Efficient and accurate finite element (FE) modelling of bolted joints is essential for increasing confidence in the investigation of structural vibrations. However, modelling of bolted joints for the investigation is often found to be very challenging. This paper proposes an appropriate FE representation of bolted joints for the prediction of the dynamic behaviour of a bolted joint structure. Two different FE models of the bolted joint structure with two different FE element connectors, which are CBEAM and CBUSH, representing the bolted joints are developed. Modal updating is used to correlate the two FE models with the experimental model. The dynamic behaviour of the two FE models is compared with experimental modal analysis to evaluate and determine the most appropriate FE model of the bolted joint structure. The comparison reveals that the CBUSH element connectors based FE model has a greater capability in representing the bolted joints with 86 percent accuracy and greater efficiency in updating the model parameters. The proposed modelling technique will be useful in the modelling of a complex structure with a large number of bolted joints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document