Lessons Learned from 3 Editions of an Introductory Course in Space Mission Operations

Author(s):  
Tanya Boardman ◽  
Adam Baker ◽  
Ed Chester ◽  
Matt Cosby
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeng-Shing Chern ◽  
An-Ming Wu ◽  
Shin-Fa Lin

Author(s):  
Leila Meshkat ◽  
Granvil Pennington ◽  
James Ruszkowski ◽  
Jean Haensly ◽  
Charles Hogle

AI Magazine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 46-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Frank ◽  
Kerry McGuire ◽  
Haifa R. Moses ◽  
Jerri Stephenson

As NASA explores destinations beyond the Moon, the distance between Earth and spacecraft will increase communication delays between astronauts and Mission Control. Today, astronauts coordinate with Mission Control to request assistance and await approval to perform tasks. Many of these coordination tasks require multiple exchanges of information, (for example, taking turns). In the presence of long communication delays, the length of time between turns may lead to inefficiency, or increased mission risk. Future astronauts will need software-based decision aids to enable them to work autonomously from Mission Control. These tools require the right combination of mission operations functions, for example, automated planning and fault management, troubleshooting recommendations, easy to access information, and just-in-time training. Ensuring these elements are properly designed and integrated requires an integrated human factors approach. This article describes a recent demonstration of autonomous mission operations using a novel software-based decision aid onboard the International Space Station. We describe how this new technology changes the way astronauts coordinate with mission control, and how the lessons learned from these early demonstrations will enable the operational autonomy needed to ensure astronauts can safely journey to Mars, and beyond.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Thomas Pitts

Th is reflective analysis details four approaches to an introductory course for evaluation learners within a methodologically focused graduate-level program on statistics, measurement, and research design. Evidence of student learning outcomes, or SLOs, was utilized within Gibbs’ reflective cycles to redesign the course using Fink’s integrated course design process. The purpose of each approach varied along a theory-practice continuum, including theory, theory-to-practice, practice, and evidence building. The purpose, SLOs, and learning experiences of each approach are accompanied by longitudinal reflections on evaluation learners, course purposes, and the creation of a multi-course learning progression. Th is exploration offers perspectives and lessons learned that may assist new and experienced instructors in determining how an introductory course may best fi t the learning needs of their students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document