A Comparative Study of Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Combustion Models applied to the Volvo Validation Rig

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Fureby
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Combustion Models ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Fluid Flow and Mass Transfer in a Trumpet-Shaped Ladle Shroud Using Large Eddy Simulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 495-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangshan Zhang ◽  
Jingshe Li ◽  
Yi Yan ◽  
Zhixin Chen ◽  
Shufeng Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Standard Smagorinsky Model and Dynamic Smagorinsky Model in Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-53
Author(s):  
M. S. I. Mallik ◽  
M. A. Hoque ◽  
M. A. Uddin
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Smagorinsky Model ◽  
Order Accuracy ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Contour Plots

This paper presents results of comparative study of large eddy simulation (LES) that is applied to a plane turbulent channel flow. The LES is performed by using a finite difference method of second order accuracy in space and a low-storage explicit Runge-Kutta method with third order accuracy in time. In the LES for subgrid-scale (SGS) modelling, Standard Smagorinsky Model (SSM) and Dynamic Smagorinsky Model (DSM) are used. Essential turbulence statistics from the two LES approaches are calculated and compared with those from direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. Comparing the results throughout the calculation domain, it has been found out that SSM performs better than DSM in the turbulent channel flow simulation. Flow structures in the computed flow field by the SSM and DSM are also discussed and compared through the contour plots and iso-surfaces.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document