Effects of Physical Modeling on Combustion Instability Predictions in a Single-Element Lean Direct Injection Gas Turbine Combustor

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Rohan M. Gejji ◽  
William E. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Physical Modeling ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Combustion Instability ◽  
Single Element ◽  
Gas Turbine Combustor ◽  
Lean Direct Injection

Combustion Dynamics Behavior in a Single-Element Lean Direct Injection (LDI) Gas Turbine Combustor

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Rohan Gejji ◽  
William Anderson ◽  
Changjin Yoon ◽  
Venkateswaran Sankaran
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Single Element ◽  
Gas Turbine Combustor ◽  
Combustion Dynamics ◽  
Lean Direct Injection

Combustion Dynamics in a Single-Element Lean Direct Injection Gas Turbine Combustor

2019 ◽  
Vol 192 (12) ◽  
pp. 2371-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Rohan Gejji ◽  
William Anderson ◽  
Changjin Yoon ◽  
Venkateswaran Sankaran
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Single Element ◽  
Gas Turbine Combustor ◽  
Combustion Dynamics ◽  
Lean Direct Injection

Numerical Investigation of Combustion Instabilities in a Single-Element Lean Direct Inject Combustor Using Flamelet Based Approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Sudhir Patwardhan ◽  
Pravin Nakod ◽  
Stefano Orsino ◽  
Carlo Arguinzoni
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Single Element ◽  
Combustion Instabilities ◽  
Gas Turbine Combustor ◽  
Combustion Dynamics ◽  
Lean Direct Injection ◽  
Combustion Models ◽  
Simulation Results

Abstract In this paper, high-fidelity large eddy simulations (LES) along with flamelet-based combustion models are assessed to predict combustion dynamics in low-emission gas turbine combustor. A model configuration of a single-element lean direct injection (LDI) combustor from Purdue University (Huang et al., 2014, “Combustion Dynamics Behavior in a Single-Element Lean Direct Injection (LDI) Gas Turbine Combustor,” 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, July 28–30.) is used for the validation of simulation results. Two combustion models based on the flamelet concept, i.e., steady diffusion flamelet (SDF) model and flamelet generated manifold (FGM) model are employed to predict combustion instabilities. Simulations are carried out for two equivalence ratios of φ = 0.6, and 0.4. The results in the form of mode shapes, peak to peak pressure amplitude and power spectrum density (PSD) are compared with the experimental data of Huang et al. (2014, “Combustion Dynamics Behavior in a Single-Element Lean Direct Injection (LDI) Gas Turbine Combustor,” 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, July 28–30.). The effect of variation in the time-step size hence acoustic courant number is studied. Further, two numerical solver options, i.e., pressure-based segregated solver and pressure-based coupled solver, are used to understand their effect on the solution convergence regarding the number of time-steps required to reach the limit cycle of the pressure oscillations. A truncated (half) domain simulation is performed by applying an appropriate acoustic impedance boundary condition at the truncated location. Overall, the simulation results compare well with the experimental data and trends are captured accurately in all simulations. It builds confidence in flamelet-based combustion models for the use in combustion instability modeling which is traditionally done using finite rate chemistry models based on reduced kinetics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document