Making Air Traffic Management-Weather Integration a Reality: A Concept of Integration of Weather Information into Time-Based Flow Management

Author(s):  
Matt Fronzak ◽  
Mark Huberdeau ◽  
Zach Ladd ◽  
Claudia McKnight ◽  
Donna Medric ◽  
...  
1990 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Hume

The situation today can be described as very frustrating for a variety of reasons. Air traffic flow-management (ATFM) has dominated the scene for many years since its conception in 1980. At that time, the principles of ATFM were directed at ensuring that temporary or isolated sector overloads could be handled by ATC and only when broad, prolonged overloads were expected was ATFM activated. Today, we have the reverse situation, where ATFM is active throughout 16 h or more during each day. The system as such was never intended or planned to cope with such a burden and the results are seen in a variety of forms, including departure delays as shown in Fig. 1.


In many airports and air markets, congestion problems & weather are becoming more and more severe. To keep Air Traffic Control (ATC) against the overload of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) activity, attempts to anticipate and prevent the resulting overload and limit the delays. A delay in the arrival of the flight (so-called congestion) occurs when the traffic expects to surpass the arrival and departure capacity of the airport or the airsector capacity. There is a very extensive over general reasoning to be considered in this area. Generally speaking, most of the references found in the literature published a few years ago refer to the simplest versions, those that do not take airsector into account. This happens because the research was first done in the USA only, where traffic issues basicallylimited to the airports congestion. In the paper we present a comprehensive survey of the key optimization models of literature.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Schwarz ◽  
K. Wolfgang Kallus

Since 2010, air navigation service providers have been mandated to implement a positive and proactive safety culture based on shared beliefs, assumptions, and values regarding safety. This mandate raised the need to develop and validate a concept and tools to assess the level of safety culture in organizations. An initial set of 40 safety culture questions based on eight themes underwent psychometric validation. Principal component analysis was applied to data from 282 air traffic management staff, producing a five-factor model of informed culture, reporting and learning culture, just culture, and flexible culture, as well as management’s safety attitudes. This five-factor solution was validated across two different occupational groups and assessment dates (construct validity). Criterion validity was partly achieved by predicting safety-relevant behavior on the job through three out of five safety culture scores. Results indicated a nonlinear relationship with safety culture scales. Overall the proposed concept proved reliable and valid with respect to safety culture development, providing a robust foundation for managers, safety experts, and operational and safety researchers to measure and further improve the level of safety culture within the air traffic management context.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Schmitt ◽  
Ruzica Vujasinovic ◽  
Christiane Edinger ◽  
Julia Zillies ◽  
Vilmar Mollwitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document