scholarly journals Creation of an Upper Stage Trajectory Capability Boundary to Enable Booster System Trade Space Exploration

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Walsh ◽  
Adam Coulon ◽  
Stephen Edwards ◽  
Dimitri Mavris
Keyword(s):  
Space Exploration ◽  
Upper Stage ◽  
Trade Space Exploration

The Importance of Training for Interactive Trade Space Exploration: A Study of Novice and Expert Users

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wolf ◽  
Jennifer Hyland ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Xiaolong (Luke) Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Space Exploration ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Support Design ◽  
Computing Power ◽  
Training Video ◽  
Engine Combustion ◽  
Interactive Data ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Trade Space Exploration ◽  
Future Work

Thanks to recent advances in computing power and speed, engineers can now generate a wealth of data on demand to support design decision-making. These advances have enabled new approaches to search multidimensional trade spaces through interactive data visualization and exploration. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of interactive trade space exploration strategies by conducting human subject experiments with novice and expert users. A single objective, constrained design optimization problem involving the sizing of an engine combustion chamber is used for this study. Effectiveness is measured by comparing the best feasible design obtained by each user, and efficiency is assessed based on the percentage of feasible designs generated by each user. Results indicate that novices who watch a 5-min training video before the experiment obtain results that are not significantly different from those obtained by expert users, and both groups are statistically better than the novices without the training video in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Frequency and ordering of the visualization and exploration tools are also compared to understand the differences in each group’s search strategy. The implications of the results are discussed along with future work.

A Preliminary Study of Novice and Expert Users’ Decision-Making Procedures During Visual Trade Space Exploration

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wolf ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Xiaolong Luke Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Data Visualization ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Trade Space Exploration ◽  
Insight Into

Thanks to recent advances in computing power and speed, designers can now generate a wealth of data on demand to support engineering design decision-making. Unfortunately, while the ability to generate and store new data continues to grow, methods and tools to support multi-dimensional data exploration have evolved at a much slower pace. Moreover, current methods and tools are often ill-equipped at accommodating evolving knowledge sources and expert-driven exploration that is being enabled by computational thinking. In this paper, we discuss ongoing research that seeks to transform decades-old decision-making paradigms rooted in operations research by considering how to effectively convert data into knowledge that enhances decision-making and leads to better designs. Specifically, we address decision-making within the area of trade space exploration by conducting human-computer interaction studies using multi-dimensional data visualization software that we have been developing. We first discuss a Pilot Study that was conducted to gain insight into expected differences between novice and expert decision-makers using a small test group. We then present the results of two Preliminary Experiments designed to gain insight into procedural differences in how novices and experts use multi-dimensional data visualization and exploration tools and to measure their ability to use these tools effectively when solving an engineering design problem. This work supports our goal of developing training protocols that support efficient and effective trade space exploration.

Quantifying the Shape of Pareto Fronts During Multi-Objective Trade Space Exploration

2017 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Unal ◽  
Gordon P. Warn ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Shape Index ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Conflicting Objectives ◽  
Complex Engineering ◽  
Trade Space Exploration ◽  
Pareto Fronts ◽  
Future Work

Recent advances in simulation and computation capabilities have enabled designers to model increasingly complex engineering problems, taking into account many dimensions, or objectives, in the problem formulation. Increasing the dimensionality often results in a large trade space, where decision-makers (DM) must identify and negotiate conflicting objectives to select the best designs. Trade space exploration often involves the projection of nondominated solutions, that is, the Pareto front, onto two-objective trade spaces to help identify and negotiate tradeoffs between conflicting objectives. However, as the number of objectives increases, an exhaustive exploration of all of the two-dimensional (2D) Pareto fronts can be inefficient due to a combinatorial increase in objective pairs. Recently, an index was introduced to quantify the shape of a Pareto front without having to visualize the solution set. In this paper, a formal derivation of the Pareto Shape Index is presented and used to support multi-objective trade space exploration. Two approaches for trade space exploration are presented and their advantages are discussed, specifically: (1) using the Pareto shape index for weighting objectives and (2) using the Pareto shape index to rank objective pairs for visualization. By applying the two approaches to two multi-objective problems, the efficiency of using the Pareto shape index for weighting objectives to identify solutions is demonstrated. We also show that using the index to rank objective pairs provides DM with the flexibility to form preferences throughout the process without closely investigating all objective pairs. The limitations and future work are also discussed.

Supporting Trade Space Exploration of Multi-Dimensional Data With Interactive Multi-Scale Nested Clustering and Aggregation

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Luke Zhang ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Mary Frecker ◽  
George Lesieutre
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Discovery ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Prototype System ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Design Data ◽  
User Interactions ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Data Clusters ◽  
Trade Space Exploration

Knowledge discovery in multi-dimensional data is a challenging problem in engineering design. For example, in trade space exploration of large design data sets, designers need to select a subset of data of interest and examine data from different data dimensions and within data clusters at different granularities. This exploration is a process that demands both humans, who can heuristically decide what data to explore and how best to explore it, and computers, which can quickly identify features that may be of interest in the data. Thus, to support this process of knowledge discovery, we need tools that go beyond traditional computer-oriented optimization approaches to support advanced designer-centered trade space exploration and data interaction. This paper is an effort to address this need. In particular, we propose the Interactive Multi-Scale Nested Clustering and Aggregation (iMSNCA) framework to support trade space exploration of multi-dimensional data common to design optimization. A system prototype of this framework is implemented to allow users to visually examine large design data sets through interactive data clustering, aggregation, and visualization. The paper also presents a case study involving morphing wing design using this prototype system. By using visual tools during trade space exploration, this research suggests a new approach to support knowledge discovery in engineering design by assisting diverse user tasks, by externalizing important characteristics of data sets, and by facilitating complex user interactions with data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document