Rapid Prediction of Worst Case Gust Loads

Author(s):  
Jonathan Cooper ◽  
H. Khodaparast ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
G. Georgiou ◽  
Gareth Vio ◽  
...  
AIAA Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Haddad Khodaparast ◽  
J. E. Cooper

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 1205-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Knoblach ◽  
Gertjan Looye
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Davide Balatti ◽  
Hamed Haddad Khodaparast ◽  
Michael I Friswell ◽  
Marinos Manolesos ◽  
Mohammadreza Amoozgar

In recent years, the development of lighter and more efficient transport aircraft has led to an increased focus on gust load alleviation. A recent strategy is based on the use of folding wingtip devices that increase the aspect ratio and therefore improve the aircraft performance. Moreover, numerical studies have suggested such a folding wingtip solution may incorporate spring devices in order to provide additional gust load alleviation ability in flight. It has been shown that wingtip mass, stiffness connection and hinge orientation are key parameters to avoid flutter and achieve load alleviation during gusts. The objective of this work is to show the effects of aeroelastic hinged wingtip on the problem of worst-case gust prediction and the parameterization and optimization of such a model for this particular problem, that is, worst-case gust load prediction. In this article, a simplified aeroelastic model of full symmetric aircraft with rigid movable wingtips is developed. The effects of hinge position, orientation and spring stiffness are considered in order to evaluate the performance of this technique for gust load alleviation. In addition, the longitudinal flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft with an elastic wing and folding wingtips is studied. Multi-objective optimizations are performed using a genetic algorithm to exploit the optimal combinations of the wingtip parameters that minimize the gust response for the whole flight envelope while keeping flutter speed within the safety margin. Two strategies to increase flutter speed based on the modification of the wingtip parameters are presented.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Garcia Matas ◽  
Hamed Haddad Khodaparast ◽  
Micheal I. Friswell ◽  
Andrea Castrichini ◽  
Simon Coggon ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Karr ◽  
Thomas A. Zeiler ◽  
Rajiv Mehrotra

Author(s):  
J.D. Geller ◽  
C.R. Herrington

The minimum magnification for which an image can be acquired is determined by the design and implementation of the electron optical column and the scanning and display electronics. It is also a function of the working distance and, possibly, the accelerating voltage. For secondary and backscattered electron images there are usually no other limiting factors. However, for x-ray maps there are further considerations. The energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometers (EDS) have a much larger solid angle of detection that for WDS. They also do not suffer from Bragg’s Law focusing effects which limit the angular range and focusing distance from the diffracting crystal. In practical terms EDS maps can be acquired at the lowest magnification of the SEM, assuming the collimator does not cutoff the x-ray signal. For WDS the focusing properties of the crystal limits the angular range of acceptance of the incident x-radiation. The range is dependent upon the 2d spacing of the crystal, with the acceptance angle increasing with 2d spacing. The natural line width of the x-ray also plays a role. For the metal layered crystals used to diffract soft x-rays, such as Be - O, the minimum magnification is approximately 100X. In the worst case, for the LEF crystal which diffracts Ti - Zn, ˜1000X is the minimum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document