Cross-correlations of far field azimuthal modes in subsonic jet noise

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Kopiev ◽  
Mikhail Zaitsev ◽  
Sergey Velichko ◽  
Anna Kotova ◽  
Ivan Belyaev
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Cross Correlations ◽  
Subsonic Jet

Jet Noise Source Distribution from Far-Field Cross Correlations

AIAA Journal ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Maestrello ◽  
Chen-Huei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Noise Source ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Source Distribution ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Cross Correlations

Analysis of far-field coherence of subsonic jet noise

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
José R. Sirotto ◽  
Julio A. Cordioli ◽  
André V. Cavalieri
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Field Coherence ◽  
Subsonic Jet

scholarly journals A coherence-matched linear source mechanism for subsonic jet noise

2015 ◽  
Vol 776 ◽  
pp. 235-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yamin B. Baqui ◽  
Anurag Agarwal ◽  
André V. G. Cavalieri ◽  
Samuel Sinayoko
Keyword(s):  
Linear Models ◽  
Hydrodynamic Instability ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Turbulent Jets ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Linear Wave ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Potential Core ◽  
Subsonic Jet

We investigate source mechanisms for subsonic jet noise using experimentally obtained datasets of high-Reynolds-number Mach 0.4 and 0.6 turbulent jets. The focus is on the axisymmetric mode which dominates downstream sound radiation for low polar angles and the frequency range at which peak noise occurs. A linearized Euler equation (LEE) solver with an inflow boundary condition is used to generate single-frequency hydrodynamic instability waves, and the resulting near-field fluctuations and far-field acoustics are compared with those from experiments and linear parabolized stability equation (LPSE) computations. It is found that the near-field velocity fluctuations closely agree with experiments and LPSE computations up to the end of the potential core, downstream of which deviations occur, but the LEE results match experiments better than the LPSE results. Both the near-field wavepackets and the sound field are observed directly from LEE computations, but the far-field sound pressure levels (SPLs) obtained are more than an order of magnitude lower than experimental values despite close statistical agreement of the near hydrodynamic field up to the potential core region. We explore the possibility that this discrepancy is due to the mismatch between the decay of two-point coherence with increasing distance in experimental flow fluctuations and the perfect coherence in linear models. To match the near-field coherence, experimentally obtained coherence profiles are imposed on the two-point cross-spectral density (CSD) at cylindrical and conical surfaces that enclose near-field structures generated with LEEs. The surface pressure is propagated to the far field using boundary value formulations based on the linear wave equation. Coherence matching yields far-field SPLs which show improved agreement with experimental results, indicating that coherence decay is the main missing component in linear models. The CSD on the enclosing surfaces reveals that the application of a decaying coherence profile spreads the hydrodynamic component of the linear wavepacket source on to acoustic wavenumbers, resulting in a more efficient acoustic source.

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Far-Field Noise Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Radial Distance ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Surface Interaction ◽  
Shielding Effect ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Field Noise ◽  
Surface Length

Many configurations proposed for the next generation of aircraft rely on the wing or other aircraft surfaces to shield the engine noise from the observers on the ground. However, the ability to predict the shielding effect and any new noise sources that arise from the high-speed jet flow interacting with a hard surface is currently limited. Furthermore, quality experimental data from jets with surfaces nearby suitable for developing and validating noise prediction methods are usually tied to a particular vehicle concept and, therefore, very complicated. The Jet-Surface Interaction Tests are intended to supply a high quality set of data covering a wide range of surface geometries and positions and jet flows to researchers developing aircraft noise prediction tools. The initial goal is to measure the noise of a jet near a simple planar surface while varying the surface length and location in order to: (1) validate noise prediction schemes when the surface is acting only as a jet noise shield and when the jet-surface interaction is creating additional noise, and (2) determine regions of interest for future, more detailed, tests. To meet these objectives, a flat plate was mounted on a two-axis traverse in two distinct configurations: (1) as a shield between the jet and the observer and (2) as a reflecting surface on the opposite side of the jet from the observer. The surface length was varied between 2 and 20 jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Similarly, the radial distance from the jet centerline to the surface face was varied between 1 and 16 jet diameters. Far-field and phased array noise data were acquired at each combination of surface length and radial location using two nozzles operating at jet exit conditions across several flow regimes: subsonic cold, subsonic hot, underexpanded, ideally expanded, and overexpanded supersonic. The far-field noise results, discussed here, show where the jet noise is partially shielded by the surface and where jet-surface interaction noise dominates the low frequency spectrum as a surface extends downstream and approaches the jet plume.

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Phased Array Noise Source Localization Results

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary G. Podboy
Keyword(s):  
Source Localization ◽  
Phased Array ◽  
Noise Source ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Sound Waves ◽  
Axial Distribution ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
Interaction Test

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect that a planar surface located near a jet flow has on the noise radiated to the far-field. Two different configurations were tested: 1) a shielding configuration in which the surface was located between the jet and the far-field microphones, and 2) a reflecting configuration in which the surface was mounted on the opposite side of the jet, and thus the jet noise was free to reflect off the surface toward the microphones. Both conventional far-field microphone and phased array noise source localization measurements were obtained. This paper discusses phased array results, while a companion paper discusses far-field results. The phased array data show that the axial distribution of noise sources in a jet can vary greatly depending on the jet operating condition and suggests that it would first be necessary to know or be able to predict this distribution in order to be able to predict the amount of noise reduction to expect from a given shielding configuration. The data obtained on both subsonic and supersonic jets show that the noise sources associated with a given frequency of noise tend to move downstream, and therefore, would become more difficult to shield, as jet Mach number increases. The noise source localization data obtained on cold, shock-containing jets suggests that the constructive interference of sound waves that produces noise at a given frequency within a broadband shock noise hump comes primarily from a small number of shocks, rather than from all the shocks at the same time. The reflecting configuration data illustrates that the law of reflection must be satisfied in order for jet noise to reflect off of a surface to an observer, and depending on the relative locations of the jet, the surface, and the observer, only some of the jet noise sources may satisfy this requirement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document