scholarly journals The Effects of Enhanced Hexapod Motion on Airline Pilot Recurrent Training and Evaluation

Author(s):  
Tiauw Go ◽  
Judith Burki-Cohen ◽  
William Chung ◽  
Jeffery Schroeder ◽  
Ghislain Saillant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1129-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.T. de Mello ◽  
A.M. Esteves ◽  
M.L.N. Pires ◽  
D.C. Santos ◽  
L.R.A. Bittencourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 101877
Author(s):  
Lijing Wang ◽  
Yanlong Wang ◽  
Yingchun Chen ◽  
Xing Pan ◽  
Wenjin Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lenard Mariyanov Adanov ◽  
Andrew Macintyre ◽  
Marina Efthymiou

Pilot training and recruitment is of fundamental importance for the aviation industry. Yet, a number of Commercial Pilot’s License (CPL) applicants trained by Approved Training Organizations (ATOs) fail their airline assessments. To provide some clarity on why this is happening, we conducted in-depth interviews with twelve industry professionals and a detailed documentary analysis was undertaken. We found that the main reasons are: (1) Lack of preparation or technical knowledge; (2) Poor communication skills; and (3) Poor display of teamwork and leadership. The paper suggests that regulation should be implemented for ATO’s to use screening processes on potential students to increase quality or Airline Pilot Standard Multi Crew-Cooperation (APS MCC) system, as an additional training system on top of what is being taught in ATOs. Regulations should further be linked with regular audits in place for smaller airlines to increase the effectiveness of their pilot assessments and recruitment processes in order to increase safety. Areas of further research as also identified.


1958 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-115
Author(s):  
B. OTIS CHREUDER ◽  
C. CRAIG WRIGHT
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Daniel J. Garland ◽  
David W. Abbott ◽  
V. David Hopkin ◽  
John A. Wise ◽  
Russell A. Benel ◽  
...  

There is a real possibility that the air traffic control system in the United States will change radically in the next decade. One vision–“free flight” or “free routing”–is to move most of the responsibility for navigation and separation back to the cockpit and away from ground based air traffic systems. The basic notion of free flight is that each flight would be completely determined by the user, i.e. by some form of airline/pilot combination, and would not need to follow pre-defined airways or altitudes. The airlines would inform the air traffic system of each aircraft's intentions, but would not have to seek any prior air traffic approval. The job of the air traffic system would be to meet the user's requirements, but not to suggest what those requirements should be. However, the air traffic system would be expected to collaborate with the airlines to ensure the safe passage of flights and to intervene when aircraft separation requirements are jeopardized or violated. Such a system would bring with it dramatic changes in the roles of all the human members of the aviation system, and as such, would have significant human factors impacts. The goal of this panel will be to identify and discuss some of those issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document