Fundamental Biology Research Project aboard Mir

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Jahns ◽  
Paul Savage ◽  
Teri Schnepp
Keyword(s):  
Research Project ◽  
Fundamental Biology ◽  
Biology Research

An Integrated Molecular Biology Research Project for High School Students

2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. e108-e113
Author(s):  
Edward A. Carr ◽  
Jeff Charney ◽  
William Sofer ◽  
Andrew K. Vershon
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Molecular Biology ◽  
School Students ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Biology Research

scholarly journals Advancing Science while Training Undergraduates: Recommendations from a Collaborative Biology Research Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. es13
Author(s):  
Danielle Jensen-Ryan ◽  
Courtney J. Murren ◽  
Matthew T. Rutter ◽  
Jennifer Jo Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Research Network ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Research Networks ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Research Project ◽  
High Quality Data ◽  
Network Research ◽  
Biology Research

This essay investigates the interplay of scientific and pedagogical objectives within an undergraduate-focused network research project. The multiple priorities faculty face in mentoring emerging scientists while producing high-quality data are discussed and pragmatic recommendations to support effective undergraduate-focused research networks are offered.

Fundamental Biology Research During the NASA/Mir Science Program

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Savage ◽  
G. C. Jahns ◽  
V. Sytchev ◽  
P. Davies ◽  
D. Pletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Science Program ◽  
Fundamental Biology ◽  
Biology Research

Reflections on the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework

Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Willis ◽  
Hennie Boeije
Keyword(s):  
Research Design ◽  
Cognitive Testing ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Cognitive Interviewing ◽  
Research Groups ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Full Explanation ◽  
Key Steps

Based on the experiences of three research groups using and evaluating the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF), we draw conclusions about the utility of the CIRF as a guide to creating cognitive testing reports. Authors generally found the CIRF checklist to be usable, and that it led to a more complete description of key steps involved. However, despite the explicit direction by the CIRF to include a full explanation of major steps and features (e.g., research objectives and research design), the three cognitive testing reports tended to simply state what was done, without further justification. Authors varied in their judgments concerning whether the CIRF requires the appropriate level of detail. Overall, we believe that current cognitive interviewing practice will benefit from including, within cognitive testing reports, the 10 categories of information specified by the CIRF. Future use of the CIRF may serve to direct the overall research project from the start, and to further the goal of evaluation of specific cognitive interviewing procedures.

Collaboration, Power, Participation and Control on a Large Scale Research Team: Multiple Perspectives from the Oxford House Research Project

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Olson ◽  
Leonard Jason ◽  
Joseph R. Ferrari ◽  
Leon Venable ◽  
Bertel F. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Multiple Perspectives ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Oxford House ◽  
And Control
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document