Installed jet noise prediction model for coaxial jets

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bhat ◽  
A. Blackner
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Coaxial Jets

scholarly journals Jet-Noise-Prediction Model for Chevrons and Microjets

AIAA Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 3928-3940 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. K. Depuru Mohan ◽  
A. P. Dowling
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction

Road Traffic Noise Prediction Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 110-112
Author(s):  
Rahul Singh ◽  
◽  
Parveen Bawa ◽  
Ranjan Kumar Thakur
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Traffic Noise ◽  
Road Traffic Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Far-Field Noise Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Radial Distance ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Surface Interaction ◽  
Shielding Effect ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Field Noise ◽  
Surface Length

Many configurations proposed for the next generation of aircraft rely on the wing or other aircraft surfaces to shield the engine noise from the observers on the ground. However, the ability to predict the shielding effect and any new noise sources that arise from the high-speed jet flow interacting with a hard surface is currently limited. Furthermore, quality experimental data from jets with surfaces nearby suitable for developing and validating noise prediction methods are usually tied to a particular vehicle concept and, therefore, very complicated. The Jet-Surface Interaction Tests are intended to supply a high quality set of data covering a wide range of surface geometries and positions and jet flows to researchers developing aircraft noise prediction tools. The initial goal is to measure the noise of a jet near a simple planar surface while varying the surface length and location in order to: (1) validate noise prediction schemes when the surface is acting only as a jet noise shield and when the jet-surface interaction is creating additional noise, and (2) determine regions of interest for future, more detailed, tests. To meet these objectives, a flat plate was mounted on a two-axis traverse in two distinct configurations: (1) as a shield between the jet and the observer and (2) as a reflecting surface on the opposite side of the jet from the observer. The surface length was varied between 2 and 20 jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Similarly, the radial distance from the jet centerline to the surface face was varied between 1 and 16 jet diameters. Far-field and phased array noise data were acquired at each combination of surface length and radial location using two nozzles operating at jet exit conditions across several flow regimes: subsonic cold, subsonic hot, underexpanded, ideally expanded, and overexpanded supersonic. The far-field noise results, discussed here, show where the jet noise is partially shielded by the surface and where jet-surface interaction noise dominates the low frequency spectrum as a surface extends downstream and approaches the jet plume.

Jet Noise Prediction: Validation and Physical Insight

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter C. van der Velden ◽  
Damiano Casalino ◽  
Pradeep Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Avinash Jammalamadaka ◽  
Yanbing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Physical Insight

Jet Noise Prediction via Low-order Machine Learning

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Ruscher ◽  
Sivaram Gogineni ◽  
Andrew S. Tenney ◽  
Mark N. Glauser
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Low Order
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document