Wall layer microturbulence phenomenological model and a semi-Markov probability predictive model for active control of turbulent boundary layers

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Meng
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Model ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Phenomenological Model ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Wall Layer

Studying turbulence using direct numerical simulation: 1987 Center for Turbulence Research NASA Ames/Stanford Summer Programme

1988 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. 375-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. R. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Isotropic Turbulence ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Finite Amplitude ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Scale Motion

This paper is an account of a summer programme for the study of the ideas and models of turbulent flows, using the results of direct numerical stimulations of the Navier-Stokes equations. These results had been obtained on the computers and stored as accessible databases at the Center for Turbulence Research (CTR) of NASA Ames Research Center and Stanford University. At this first summer programme, some 32 visiting researchers joined those at the CTR to test hypotheses and models in five aspects of turbulence research: turbulence decomposition, bifurcation and chaos; two-point closure (or k-space) modelling; structure of turbulent boundary layers; Reynolds-stress modelling; scalar transport and reacting flows.A number of new results emerged including: computation of space and space-time correlations in isotropic turbulence can be related to each other and modelled in terms of the advection of small scales by large-scale motion; the wall layer in turbulent boundary layers is dominated by shear layers which protrude into the outer layers, and have long lifetimes; some aspects of the ejection mechanism for these layers can be described in terms of the two-dimensional finite-amplitude Navier-Stokes solutions; a self-similar form of the two-point, cross-correlation data of the turbulence in boundary layers (when normalized by the r.m.s. value at the furthest point from the wall) shows how both the blocking of eddies by the wall and straining by the mean shear control the lengthscales; the intercomponent transfer (pressure-strain) is highly localized in space, usually in regions of concentrated vorticity; conditioned pressure gradients are linear in the conditioning of velocity and independent of vorticity in homogeneous shear flow; some features of coherent structures in the boundary layer are similar to experimental measurements of structures in mixing-layers, jets and wakes.The availability of comprehensive velocity and pressure data certainly helps the investigation of concepts and models. But a striking feature of the summer programme was the diversity of interpretation of the same computed velocity fields. There are few signs of any convergence in turbulence research! But with new computational facilities the divergent approaches can at least be related to each other.

Review—Advances in Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers With Emphasis on the Wall-Layer Regions

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Johnston ◽  
K. A. Flack
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulence Modeling ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
The Other ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Low Speed Streaks

Current information concerning three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers is discussed. Several topics are presented including (i) a detailed description of eleven experiments published since 1990. In nine cases cross flows are controlled by pressure gradients imposed from the freestream, but in two cases the cross flows are wall-shear-driven. The other topics include (ii) an examination of state of the art in measurement techniques; (iii) a look at some issues and ideas in turbulence modeling; and (iv) an introduction to new work on the visualization and description of quasicoherent structures (high/low-speed streaks and turbulent vortices) in three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers.

Active control of turbulent boundary layers

2003 ◽  
Vol 495 ◽  
pp. 209-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUBEN RATHNASINGHAM ◽  
KENNETH S. BREUER
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers

Scaling of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers

1992 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 699-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Durbin ◽  
S. E. Belcher
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Small Range ◽  
Surface Shear Stress ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean

An asymptotic analysis is developed for turbulent boundary layers in strong adverse pressure gradients. It is found that the boundary layer divides into three distinguishable regions: these are the wall layer, the wake layer and a transition layer. This structure has two key differences from the zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer: the wall layer is not exponentially thinner than the wake; and the wake has a large velocity deficit, and cannot be linearized. The mean velocity profile has a y½ behaviour in the overlap layer between the wall and transition regions.The analysis is done in the context of eddy viscosity closure modelling. It is found that k-ε-type models are suitable to the wall region, and have a power-law solution in the y½ layer. The outer-region scaling precludes the usual ε-equation. The Clauser, constant-viscosity model is used in that region. An asymptotic expansion of the mean flow and matching between the three regions is carried out in order to determine the relation between skin friction and pressure gradient. Numerical calculations are done for self-similar flow. It is found that the surface shear stress is a double-valued function of the pressure gradient in a small range of pressure gradients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document