Aeroelastic stability analysis of an airfoil with structural nonlinearities using a state space unsteady aerodynamics model

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Murty
Keyword(s):  
Stability Analysis ◽  
State Space ◽  
Unsteady Aerodynamics ◽  
Aeroelastic Stability ◽  
Structural Nonlinearities

scholarly journals Geometrical Nonlinear Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of a Composite High-Aspect-Ratio Wing

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 325-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Chuan Xie ◽  
Jia Zhen Leng ◽  
Chao Yang
Keyword(s):  
Stability Analysis ◽  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Equilibrium State ◽  
High Aspect Ratio ◽  
Unsteady Aerodynamics ◽  
Static Equilibrium ◽  
Beam Model ◽  
Aeroelastic Stability ◽  
Nonlinear Flutter ◽  
Static Equilibrium State

A composite high-aspect-ratio wing of a high-altitude long-endurance (HALE) aircraft was modeled with FEM by MSC/NASTRAN, and the nonlinear static equilibrium state is calculated under design load with follower force effect, but without load redistribution. Assuming the little vibration amplitude of the wing around the static equilibrium state, the system is linearized and the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the deformed structure are obtained. Planar doublet lattice method is used to calculate unsteady aerodynamics in frequency domain ignoring the bending effect of the deflected wing. And then, the aeroelastic stability analysis of the system under a given load condition is successively carried out. Comparing with the linear results, the nonlinear displacement of the wing tip is higher. The results indicate that the critical nonlinear flutter is of the flap/chordwise bending type because of the chordwise bending having quite a large torsion component, with low critical speed and slowly growing damping, which dose not appear in the linear analysis. Furthermore, it is shown that the variation of the nonlinear flutter speed depends on the scale of the load and on the chordwise bending frequency. The research work indicates that, for the very flexible HALE aircraft, the nonlinear aeroelastic stability is very important, and should be considered in the design progress. Using present FEM software as the structure solver (e.g. MSC/NASTRAN), and the unsteady aerodynamic code, the nonlinear aeroelastic stability margin of a complex system other than a simple beam model can be determined.

A z-Transform Discrete-Time State-Space Formulation for Aeroelastic Stability Analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1564-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Noll Marques ◽  
Joao Luiz F. Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Stability Analysis ◽  
State Space ◽  
Discrete Time ◽  
Aeroelastic Stability ◽  
Space Formulation

scholarly journals High-Fidelity Fin–Actuator System Modeling and Aeroelastic Analysis Considering Friction Effect

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3057
Author(s):  
Jin Lu ◽  
Zhigang Wu ◽  
Chao Yang
Keyword(s):  
System Modeling ◽  
Past Research ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Aeroelastic Stability ◽  
Aeroelastic Analysis ◽  
Structural Nonlinearities ◽  
Flutter Boundary ◽  
Actuator System ◽  
Friction Models ◽  
Comparison Of The Results

Both the dynamic characteristics and structural nonlinearities of an actuator will affect the flutter boundary of a fin–actuator system. The actuator models used in past research are not universal, the accuracy is difficult to guarantee, and the consideration of nonlinearity is not adequate. Based on modularization, a high-fidelity modeling method for an actuator is proposed in this paper. This model considers both freeplay and friction, which is easy to expand. It can be directly used to analyze actuator characteristics and perform aeroelastic analysis of fin–actuator systems. Friction can improve the aeroelastic stability, but the mechanism of its influence on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system has not been reported. In this paper, the LuGre model, which can better reflect the friction characteristics, was integrated into the actuator. The influence of the initial condition, freeplay, and friction on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system was analyzed. The comparison of the results with the previous research shows that oversimplified friction models are not accurate enough to reflect the mechanism of friction’s influence. By changing the loads, material, and geometry of contact surfaces, flutter can be effectively suppressed, and the power loss caused by friction can be minimized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document