Parametric study of a two-dimensional turbulent wall jet in a movingstream with arbitrary pressure gradient

AIAA Journal ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 2156-2165 ◽  
Author(s):  
SURESH H. GORADIA ◽  
GENE T. COLWELL
1975 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Traugott

A two-dimensional horizontal flow is discussed, which is induced by other, buoyancy-driven flows elsewhere. It is an adaptation of the incompressible wall jet, which is driven by conditions a t the leading edge and has no streamwise pressure gradient. The relation of this flow to the classical buoyancy-driven boundary layers on inclined and horizontal surfaces is investigated, as well as its possible connexion with a two-dimensional buoyant plume driven by a line source of heat. Composite flows are constructed by patching various such solutions together. The composite flows exhibit$Gr^{\frac{1}{4}}$scaling (Grbeing the Grashof number).


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (0) ◽  
pp. S05116P
Author(s):  
Koji NAKANO ◽  
Koji IWANO ◽  
Yasuhiko SAKAI ◽  
Yasumasa ITO

1963 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. E. Myers ◽  
J. J. Schauer ◽  
R. H. Eustis

The heat-transfer characteristics of two-dimensional, incompressible, turbulent wall jets are discussed. An analytical prediction is made for the local Stanton number and data are presented for a step wall temperature distribution. The method for extending these data to arbitrary heating conditions is shown. Temperature surveys in the wall jet boundary layer are also presented.


1961 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 481 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Schwarz ◽  
W. P. Cosart

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Eriksson ◽  
R. I. Karlsson ◽  
J. Persson

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
T.B. Hedley ◽  
J.F. Keffer

The mean flow field of a two-dimensional turbulent wall jet which encounters a uniform suction is examined. A marked increase in wall shear stress was observed for all suction levels as the jet moved into the suction zone. When the suction level is moderate a viscous sublayer exists next to the surface. The dominance of the flow by the free jet motion however prevents any law-of-the-wall representation for the adjacent turbulent region and a velocity defect model is found to be more satisfactory. One can interpret this lack of an extensive equilibrium layer to mean that the transport processes are controlled by the action of the large eddies over almost the entire wall jet zone, with or without suction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document