Supersonic laminar boundary layer along a two- dimensional adiabaticcurved ramp.

AIAA Journal ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
DENNY R. S. KO ◽  
TOSHI KUBOTA
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Supersonic Laminar

Measurement of Recovery Factors and Friction Coefficients for Supersonic Flow of Air in a Tube: 2—Results Based on a Two-Dimensional Flow Model for Entrance Region

1952 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-194
Author(s):  
J. Kaye ◽  
T. Y. Toong ◽  
R. H. Shoulberg
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Supersonic Flow ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Variable Mass ◽  
Entrance Region ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Flow ◽  
Change Of State ◽  
Two Dimensional Flow

Abstract The first part of a program to obtain reliable data on the rate of heat transfer to air moving at supersonic speeds in a tube has been devoted to measurements made on adiabatic supersonic flow of air in a tube. The details of these measurements have been described in a previous paper. The calculated quantities such as the local apparent friction coefficient, recovery factor, Mach number, and so forth, were obtained from the simple one-dimensional flow model for which the properties of the stream are uniform at any section, and boundary-layer effects are ignored. The analysis of some of the same data given in the previous paper is undertaken here with the aid of a simplified two-dimensional flow model. The supersonic flow in the tube is divided into a supersonic core of variable mass with the fluid remaining in the core undergoing a reversible adiabatic change of state, and a laminar boundary layer of variable mass. The compressible laminar boundary layer increases in thickness in the direction of flow, and then undergoes a transition to a turbulent boundary layer. The two-dimensional flow model is limited here to the region where a laminar boundary layer appears to be present in the entrance region of the tube. The results of the analysis based on the two-dimensional flow model indicate that where the flow in the tube boundary layer appears to be laminar, the measured pressures and temperatures in the tube for adiabatic supersonic flow of air could have been predicted, with sufficient accuracy for engineering problems, from measured data for supersonic flow of air over a flat plate with a laminar boundary layer, and with zero pressure gradient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document