Comparative study of turbulence models in predicting turbulent pipe flow. II - Reynolds stress and k-epsilon models

AIAA Journal ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1714-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pollard ◽  
R. Martinuzzi
Author(s):  
Boualem Laribi ◽  
Pierre Wauters ◽  
Mohamed Aichouni

The present work is concerned a comparative study of the decay of swirling turbulent pipe flow downstream of three flow conditioners, the Etoile, the Tube bundle, and the Laws perforate plate, and its effect on accuracy of orifice plate flow meter. The swirl was generated by a double 90° degrees elbows in perpendicular planes. The discharge coefficients were measured with 3 different orifice meters with β = 0.5, 0.62, 0.70 at different Reynolds number. As a conclusion, the experimental study of the three flow conditioners used separately shows that the flow need longer distance for close to fully developed pipe flow and some errors, by reason of the swirl, on the discharge coefficient were inevitable for distance less 12D.


1976 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Sabot ◽  
Geneviève Comte-Bellot

The present investigation is oriented towards a better understanding of the turbulent structure in the core region of fully developed and completely wall-bounded flows. In view of the already existing results concerning the bursting process in boundary layers (which are semi-bounded flows), an amplitude analysis of the Reynolds shear stress fluctuation u1u2, sorted into four quadrants of the u1, u2 plane, was carried out in a turbulent pipe flow. For the wall side of the core region, in which the correlation coefficient u1u2/u’1u’2 does not change appreciably with the distance from the wall, the structure of the Reynolds stress is found to be similar to that obtained in boundary layers: bursts, i.e. ejections of low speed fluid, make the dominant contribution to the Reynolds stress; the regions of violent Reynolds stress are small fractions of the overall flow; and the mean time interval between bursts is found to be almost constant across the flow. For the core region, the large cross-stream evolution of the correlation coefficient u1u2/u’1u’2 is associated with a new structure of the Reynolds stress induced by the completely wall-bounded nature of the flow. Very large amplitudes of u1u2 are still observed, but two distinct burst-like patterns are now identified and related to ejections originating from the two opposite halves of the flow. In addition to this interaction, a focusing effect caused by the circular section of the pipe is observed. As a result of these two effects, the mean time interval between the bursts decreases significantly in the core region and reaches a minimum on the pipe axis. Investigation of specific space-time velocity correlations reveals the possible existence of rotating structures similar to those observed at the outer edge of turbulent boundary layers. These coherent motions are found to have a scale noticeably larger than that of the bursts.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. -A. Chevrin ◽  
H. L. Petrie ◽  
S. Deutsch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Belen Lopez-Santana ◽  
Andrew Kennaugh ◽  
Amir Keshmiri

Turbulence has been studied by scientists and engineers for decades as it appears in the majority of the fluids existent in nature and in engineering applications and because turbulent flow and its underlying behaviour are tremendously complex. The University of Manchester is widely viewed as the birthplace of turbulence due to the pioneering work of one of its prominent academics, Professor Osborne Reynolds (1842-1912). Building on this legacy, a classical experimental apparatus has been used in this paper to study a turbulent pipe flow with the aim of measuring the mean velocity field and wall shear stress using four experimental techniques, all developed in the 20th century, namely static pressure drop; mean square signals measured from a hot-wire; Preston tube; and the ‘Clauser Plot’. The experimental results have then been compared against those obtained using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), utilising different two-equation turbulence models. The present work highlights the discrepancies evident in obtaining the value of the wall shear stress in each method. In addition, the scopes and limitations of each technique are discussed in detail, highlighting the clear evolution of turbulence study tools over the last 100 years.


2015 ◽  
Vol 766 ◽  
pp. 272-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manna ◽  
A. Vacca ◽  
R. Verzicco

AbstractThis paper is the follow-up of a previous study (Manna, Vacca & Verzicco,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 700, 2012, pp. 246–282) that numerically investigated the effects of a harmonic volume forcing on the turbulent pipe flow at a bulk Reynolds number of$\simeq 5900$. There, the investigation was focused on the time- and space-averaged statistics of the first- and second-order moments of the velocity, the vorticity fluctuations and the Reynolds stress budgets in order to study the changes induced on the mean current by the oscillating component. The amplitude of the latter was used as a parameter for the analysis. However, as the flow is inherently unsteady, the phase-averaged statistics are also of interest, and this is the motivation and subject of the present study. Here, we show the variability of the above quantities during different phases of the flow cycle and how they are affected by the amplitude of the oscillation. It is observed that when the ratio of the oscillating to the time-constant velocity component is of the order of one (${\it\beta}\simeq O(1)$), the phase-averaged profiles are appreciably influenced by the pulsation, although only small deviations of the time-averaged counterparts have been documented. In contrast, when that ratio is increased by one order of magnitude (${\it\beta}\simeq O(10)$) the phase- and cycle-averaged quantities differ considerably, especially during the decelerating part of the cycle. In more detail, the amplitude and the phase of all turbulence statistics show significant variations with${\it\beta}$. This variability has important implications in the dynamics and modelling of these flows. Since the data have been obtained by direct numerical simulations and validated by comparisons with experimental studies, the results could be used for validation of codes, testing of turbulence models or measurement procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document