Approximation and Model Management in Aerodynamic Optimization with Variable-Fidelity Models

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1093-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia M. Alexandrov ◽  
Robert Michael Lewis ◽  
Clyde R. Gumbert ◽  
Lawrence L. Green ◽  
Perry A. Newman
Keyword(s):  
Model Management ◽  
Aerodynamic Optimization ◽  
Variable Fidelity

A Variable Fidelity Model Management Framework for Multiscale Computational Design of Continuous Fiber SiC-Si3N4 Ceramic Composites

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilberto Meji´a Rodri´guez ◽  
John E. Renaud ◽  
Vikas Tomar
Keyword(s):  
Material Design ◽  
Ceramic Composites ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Model Management ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Design Cycle ◽  
Variable Fidelity ◽  
Fidelity Model

Research applications involving design tool development for multiple phase material design are at an early stage of development. The computational requirements of advanced numerical tools for simulating material behavior such as the finite element method (FEM) and the molecular dynamics method (MD) can prohibit direct integration of these tools in a design optimization procedure where multiple iterations are required. The complexity of multiphase material behavior at multiple scales restricts the development of a comprehensive meta-model that can be used to replace the multiscale analysis. One, therefore, requires a design approach that can incorporate multiple simulations (multi-physics) of varying fidelity such as FEM and MD in an iterative model management framework that can significantly reduce design cycle times. In this research a material design tool based on a variable fidelity model management framework is presented. In the variable fidelity material design tool, complex “high fidelity” FEM analyses are performed only to guide the analytic “low-fidelity” model toward the optimal material design. The tool is applied to obtain the optimal distribution of a second phase, consisting of silicon carbide (SiC) fibers, in a silicon-nitride (Si3N4) matrix to obtain continuous fiber SiC-Si3N4 ceramic composites (CFCCs) with optimal fracture toughness. Using the variable fidelity material design tool in application to one test problem, a reduction in design cycle time around 80 percent is achieved as compared to using a conventional design optimization approach that exclusively calls the high fidelity FEM.

A Variable Fidelity Model Management Framework for Designing Multiphase Materials

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilberto Mejía-Rodríguez ◽  
John E. Renaud ◽  
Vikas Tomar
Keyword(s):  
Material Design ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
Model Management ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Cycle Times ◽  
Design Cycle ◽  
Numerical Tools ◽  
Variable Fidelity ◽  
Fidelity Model

Research applications involving design tool development for multi phase material design are at an early stage of development. The computational requirements of advanced numerical tools for simulating material behavior such as the finite element method (FEM) and the molecular dynamics (MD) method can prohibit direct integration of these tools in a design optimization procedure where multiple iterations are required. One, therefore, requires a design approach that can incorporate multiple simulations (multiphysics) of varying fidelity such as FEM and MD in an iterative model management framework that can significantly reduce design cycle times. In this research a material design tool based on a variable fidelity model management framework is presented. In the variable fidelity material design tool, complex “high-fidelity” FEM analyses are performed only to guide the analytic “low-fidelity” model toward the optimal material design. The tool is applied to obtain the optimal distribution of a second phase, consisting of silicon carbide (SiC) fibers, in a silicon-nitride (Si3N4) matrix to obtain continuous fiber SiC–Si3N4 ceramic composites with optimal fracture toughness. Using the variable fidelity material design tool in application to two test problems, a reduction in design cycle times of between 40% and 80% is achieved as compared to using a conventional design optimization approach that exclusively calls the high-fidelity FEM. The optimal design obtained using the variable fidelity approach is the same as that obtained using the conventional procedure. The variable fidelity material design tool is extensible to multiscale multiphase material design by using MD based material performance analyses as the high-fidelity analyses in order to guide low-fidelity continuum level numerical tools such as the FEM or finite-difference method with significant savings in the computational time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document