Large-Eddy Simulation of Plasma-Based Turbulent Boundary-Layer Separation Control

AIAA Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2793-2810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald P. Rizzetta ◽  
Miguel R. Visbal
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Separation Control ◽  
Layer Separation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Large Eddy Simulation of a Separating Turbulent Boundary Layer

PAMM ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10099-10102
Author(s):  
Nikolaus Peller ◽  
Michael Manhart
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet

2018 ◽  
Vol 850 ◽  
pp. 156-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Dandois ◽  
Ivan Mary ◽  
Vincent Brion
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Oscillation Amplitude ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Stream Velocity ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Shock Oscillation ◽  
Transonic Buffet

A large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet on an airfoil at a Mach number $M=0.735$, an angle of attack $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4^{\circ }$, a Reynolds number $Re_{c}=3\times 10^{6}$ has been carried out. The boundary layer is laminar up to the shock foot and laminar/turbulent transition occurs in the separation bubble at the shock foot. Contrary to the turbulent case for which wall pressure spectra are characterised by well-marked peaks at low frequencies ($St=f\cdot c/U_{\infty }\simeq 0.06{-}0.07$, where $St$ is the Strouhal number, $f$ the shock oscillation frequency, $c$ the chord length and $U_{\infty }$ the free-stream velocity), in the laminar case, there are also well-marked peaks but at a much higher frequency ($St=1.2$). The shock oscillation amplitude is also lower: 6 % of chord and limited to the shock foot area in the laminar case instead of 20 % with a whole shock oscillation and intermittent boundary layer separation and reattachment in the turbulent case. The analysis of the phase-averaged fields allowed linking of the frequency of the laminar transonic buffet to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon associated with a vortex shedding mechanism. These vortices are convected at $U_{c}/U_{\infty }\simeq 0.4$ (where $U_{c}$ is the convection velocity). The main finding of the present paper is that the higher frequency of the shock oscillation in the laminar regime is due to a different mechanism than in the turbulent one: laminar transonic buffet is due to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon occurring at the shock foot.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document