Comparison of Robust Optimization Methods Applied to Hypersonic Vehicle Design

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1510-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Ryan ◽  
Mark J. Lewis ◽  
Kenneth H. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Hypersonic Vehicle ◽  
Vehicle Design

scholarly journals Data Driven Robust Energy and Reserve Dispatch Based on a Nonparametric Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Model

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4642
Author(s):  
Li Dai ◽  
Dahai You ◽  
Xianggen Yin
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Dirichlet Process ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Gaussian Mixture ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Uncertainty Sets ◽  
Uncertainty Set ◽  
Simulation Results

Traditional robust optimization methods use box uncertainty sets or gamma uncertainty sets to describe wind power uncertainty. However, these uncertainty sets fail to utilize wind forecast error probability information and assume that the wind forecast error is symmetrical and independent. This assumption is not reasonable and makes the optimization results conservative. To avoid such conservative results from traditional robust optimization methods, in this paper a novel data driven optimization method based on the nonparametric Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model (DPGMM) was proposed to solve energy and reserve dispatch problems. First, we combined the DPGMM and variation inference algorithm to extract the GMM parameter information embedded within historical data. Based on the parameter information, a data driven polyhedral uncertainty set was proposed. After constructing the uncertainty set, we solved the robust energy and reserve problem. Finally, a column and constraint generation method was employed to solve the proposed data driven optimization method. We used real historical wind power forecast error data to test the performance of the proposed uncertainty set. The simulation results indicated that the proposed uncertainty set had a smaller volume than other data driven uncertainty sets with the same predefined coverage rate. Furthermore, the simulation was carried on PJM 5-bus and IEEE-118 bus systems to test the data driven optimization method. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed optimization method was less conservative than traditional data driven robust optimization methods and distributionally robust optimization methods.

The Effect of Different Optimization Methods on Robustness for Robust Optimization Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 721 ◽  
pp. 464-467
Author(s):  
Tao Fu ◽  
Qin Zhong Gong ◽  
Da Zhen Wang
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Objective Function ◽  
Robust Design ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Robust Optimization Design

In view of robustness of objective function and constraints in robust design, the method of maximum variation analysis is adopted to improve the robust design. In this method, firstly, we analyses the effect of uncertain factors in design variables and design parameters on the objective function and constraints, then calculate maximum variations of objective function and constraints. A two-level optimum mathematical model is constructed by adding the maximum variations to the original constraints. Different solving methods are used to solve the model to study the influence to robustness. As a demonstration, we apply our robust optimization method to an engineering example, the design of a machine tool spindle. The results show that, compared with other methods, this method of HPSO(hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm is superior on solving efficiency and solving results, and the constraint robustness and the objective robustness completely satisfy the requirement, revealing that excellent solving method can improve robustness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document