Computational Study of High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade Aerodynamics at Low Reynolds Number

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 446-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan M. Arko ◽  
Mark McQuilling
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Computational Study ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Turbine Cascade ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds

Effects of periodic wakes on the endwall secondary flow in high-lift low-pressure turbine cascades at low Reynolds numbers

2017 ◽  
Vol 233 (1) ◽  
pp. 354-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Qu ◽  
Yanfeng Zhang ◽  
Xingen Lu ◽  
Ge Han ◽  
Ziliang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
High Reynolds

Periodic wakes affect not only the surface boundary layer characteristics of low-pressure turbine blades and profile losses but also the vortex structures of the secondary flow and the corresponding losses. Thus, understanding the physical mechanisms of unsteady interactions and the potential to eliminate secondary losses is becoming increasingly important for improving the performance of high-lift low-pressure turbines. However, few studies have focused on the unsteady interaction mechanism between periodic wakes and endwall secondary flow in low-pressure turbines. This paper verified the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics by comparing experimental results and those of the numerical predictions by taking a high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade as the research object. Discussion was focused on the interaction mechanisms between the upstream wakes and secondary flow within the high-lift low-pressure turbine. The results indicated that upstream wakes have both positive and negative effects on the endwall flow, where the periodic wakes can decrease significantly the size of the separation bubble, prevent the formation of secondary vorticity structures at relatively high Reynolds numbers (100,000 and 150,000), and reduce the cross-passage pressure gradient of cascade. In addition, periodic wakes can improve the cascade incidence characteristic in terms of reducing the overturning and underturning of the secondary flow at downstream of the cascade all of which are beneficial for decreasing the endwall secondary losses, whereas more endwall boundary layer is involved in the main flow passage due to the wake transport, resulting in increased strength of the secondary flow at low Reynolds number of 25,000 and 50,000. Compared with the results without wakes, the total pressure loss for unsteady condition at the cascade exit decreases by 2.7% and 6.1% at high Reynolds number of 100,000 and 150,000, respectively. However, the secondary loss at unsteady flow conditions increases at low Reynolds number of 25,000 and 50,000.

Evaluation of RANS Transition Modeling for High Lift LPT Flows at Low Reynolds Number

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Keadle ◽  
Mark McQuilling
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

High lift low pressure turbine airfoils have complex flow features that can require advanced modeling capabilities for accurate flow predictions. These features include separated flows and the transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layers. Recent applications of computational fluid dynamics based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes formulation have included modeling for attached and separated flow transition mechanisms in the form of empirical correlations and two- or three-equation eddy viscosity models. This study uses the three-equation model of Walters and Cokljat [1] to simulate the flow around the Pack B and L2F low pressure turbine airfoils in a two-dimensional cascade arrangement at a Reynolds number of 25,000. This model includes a third equation for the development of pre-transitional laminar kinetic energy (LKE), and is an updated version of the Walters and Leylek [2] model. The aft-loaded Pack B has a nominal Zweifel loading coefficient of 1.13, and the front-loaded L2F has a nominal loading coefficient of 1.59. Results show the updated LKE model improves predicted accuracy of pressure coefficient and velocity profiles over its previous version as well as two-equation RANS models developed for separated and transitional flows. Transition onset behavior also compares favorably with experiment. However, the current model is not found suitable for wake total pressure loss predictions in two-dimensional simulations at extremely low Reynolds numbers due to the predicted coherency of suction side vortices generated in the separated shear layers which cause a local gain in wake total pressure.

The Influence of Mach Number on the Boundary Layer Development of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine in Low Reynolds Number

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhua Duan ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Weiyang Qiao
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Boundary Layer Development ◽  
Layer Development

Abstract A numerical analysis of the effect of Mach number on the boundary layer development and aerodynamic performance of a high-lift, after loaded low pressure turbine blade is presented in this paper. The turbine blade is designed for the GTF engine and works in a low Reynolds number, high Mach number environment. Three different isentropic exit Mach numbers (0.14, 0.87 and 1.17) are simulated by large eddy simulation method, while the Reynolds number based on the axial chord length of the blade and the exit flow velocity is kept the same (1 × 105). The condition Mais,2 = 0.14 represents the lowspeeed wind tunnel environment which is usually used in the low pressure turbine investigation. The condition Mais,2 = 0.87 represents the design point of the turbine blade. The condition Mais,2 = 1.17 represents the severe environment when the shock wave shows up. A comparison of the boundary layer development is made and the total pressure loss results from the boundary layer is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document