Model-Based Conceptual Design Optimization Methods: Disaggregated Weather System Follow-On

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1021-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Thompson ◽  
John M. Colombi ◽  
Jonathan Black ◽  
Bradley J. Ayres
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Weather System ◽  
Model Based

The Application of a Concurrent Design Optimization Tool to a Composite Panel for a Naval Ship Structure

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dirlik ◽  
S. Hambric ◽  
S. Azarm ◽  
M. Marquardt ◽  
A. Hellman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Electromagnetic Interference ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Composite Panel ◽  
Concurrent Design ◽  
Naval Ship ◽  
Design Tradeoffs ◽  
Local Optimizer ◽  
The Impact

Abstract A prototype concurrent design optimization tool, named CELS for Concurrent Engineering of Layered Structures, has been developed. This tool can be used to analyze and/or optimize the conceptual design of a composite panel for Naval ship topside structures. CELS integrates five technology modules: (1) electromagnetic interference, (2) radar cross section, (3) structures, (4) cost, and (5) weight. Two optimization methods drive the integration of the technology modules. These methods include: (i) a local optimizer based on feasible sequential quadratic programming, and (ii) a global optimizer based on an exhaustive search. To obtain an objectively balanced design, “goodness” measures are allocated for each objective or constraint function. These measures, via a graphical user interface, allow topside designers to easily and quickly assess the impact of their decisions on various technologies. The utility and capability of CELS are demonstrated via the design of a topside composite panel. The design study shows that CELS can be easily adapted to different topside conceptual design problems, and that design tradeoffs can be performed quickly and used in decision making.

scholarly journals Genetic evolution vs. function approximation: Benchmarking algorithms for architectural design optimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wortmann
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Parametric Design ◽  
Fitness Landscape ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Direct Search ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Simulation Based

Abstract This article presents benchmark results from seven simulation-based problems from structural, building energy, and daylight optimization. Growing applications of parametric design and performance simulations in architecture, engineering, and construction allow the harnessing of simulation-based, or black-box, optimization in the search for less resource- and/or energy consuming designs. In architectural design optimization (ADO) practice and research, the most commonly applied black-box algorithms are genetic algorithms or other metaheuristics, to the neglect of more current, global direct search or model-based, methods. Model-based methods construct a surrogate model (i.e., an approximation of a fitness landscape) that they refine during the optimization process. This benchmark compares metaheuristic, direct search, and model-based methods, and concludes that, for the given evaluation budget and problems, the model-based method (RBFOpt) is the most efficient and robust, while the tested genetic algorithms perform poorly. As such, this article challenges the popularity of genetic algorithms in ADO, as well as the practice of using them for one-to-one comparisons to justify algorithmic innovations. Highlights Benchmarks optimization algorithms on structural, energy, and daylighting problems. Benchmarks metaheuristic, direct search, and model-based optimization methods. Challenges the popularity of genetic algorithms in architectural design optimization. Presents model-based methods as a more efficient and reliable alternative.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimization Considering Fidelity Uncertainties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Neufeld
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Approximate Analysis ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Conventional Optimization ◽  
Aircraft Conceptual Design

Aircraft conceptual design traditionally utilizes simplified analysis methods and empirical equations to establish the basic layout of new aircraft. Applying optimization methods to aircraft conceptual design may yield solutions that are found to violate constraints when more sophisticated analysis methods are introduced. The designer's confidence that proposed conceptual designs will meet their performance target is limited when conventional optimization approaches are utilized. Therefore, there is a need for an optimization approach that takes into account the uncertainties that arise when traditional analysis methods are used in aircraft conceptual design optimization. This research introduces a new aircraft conceptual design optimization approach that utilizes the concept of Reliability Based Design Optimization (RBDO). RyeMDO, a framework for multi-objective, multi-disciplinary RBDO was developed for this purpose. The performance and effectiveness of the RBDO-MDO approaches implemented in RyeMDO were evaluated to identify the most promising approaches for aircraft conceptual design optimization. Additionally, an approach for quantifying the errors introduced by approximate analysis methods was developed. The approach leverages available historical data to quantify the uncertainties introduced by approximate analysis methods in two engineering case studies: the conceptual design optimization of an aircraft wing box structure and the conceptual design optimization of a commercial aircraft. The case studies were solved with several of the most promising RBDO-MDO integrated approaches. The proposed approach yields more conservative solutions and estimates the risk associated with each solution, enabling designers to reduce the likelihood that conceptual aircraft designs will fail to meet objectives later in the design process.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimization Considering Fidelity Uncertainties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Neufeld
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Approximate Analysis ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Conventional Optimization ◽  
Aircraft Conceptual Design

Aircraft conceptual design traditionally utilizes simplified analysis methods and empirical equations to establish the basic layout of new aircraft. Applying optimization methods to aircraft conceptual design may yield solutions that are found to violate constraints when more sophisticated analysis methods are introduced. The designer's confidence that proposed conceptual designs will meet their performance target is limited when conventional optimization approaches are utilized. Therefore, there is a need for an optimization approach that takes into account the uncertainties that arise when traditional analysis methods are used in aircraft conceptual design optimization. This research introduces a new aircraft conceptual design optimization approach that utilizes the concept of Reliability Based Design Optimization (RBDO). RyeMDO, a framework for multi-objective, multi-disciplinary RBDO was developed for this purpose. The performance and effectiveness of the RBDO-MDO approaches implemented in RyeMDO were evaluated to identify the most promising approaches for aircraft conceptual design optimization. Additionally, an approach for quantifying the errors introduced by approximate analysis methods was developed. The approach leverages available historical data to quantify the uncertainties introduced by approximate analysis methods in two engineering case studies: the conceptual design optimization of an aircraft wing box structure and the conceptual design optimization of a commercial aircraft. The case studies were solved with several of the most promising RBDO-MDO integrated approaches. The proposed approach yields more conservative solutions and estimates the risk associated with each solution, enabling designers to reduce the likelihood that conceptual aircraft designs will fail to meet objectives later in the design process.

scholarly journals Machine Learning for Design Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices: Recent Developments and Future Directions

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1627
Author(s):  
Yanbin Li ◽  
Gang Lei ◽  
Gerd Bramerdorfer ◽  
Sheng Peng ◽  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Cloud Services ◽  
Robust Design Optimization ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Electromagnetic Devices ◽  
Recent Developments

This paper reviews the recent developments of design optimization methods for electromagnetic devices, with a focus on machine learning methods. First, the recent advances in multi-objective, multidisciplinary, multilevel, topology, fuzzy, and robust design optimization of electromagnetic devices are overviewed. Second, a review is presented to the performance prediction and design optimization of electromagnetic devices based on the machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural network, support vector machine, extreme learning machine, random forest, and deep learning. Last, to meet modern requirements of high manufacturing/production quality and lifetime reliability, several promising topics, including the application of cloud services and digital twin, are discussed as future directions for design optimization of electromagnetic devices.

scholarly journals Recent Design Optimization Methods for Energy-Efficient Electric Motors and Derived Requirements for a New Improved Method—Part 1

Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (22) ◽  
pp. 1400
Author(s):  
Johannes Schmelcher ◽  
Max Kleine Büning ◽  
Kai Kreisköther ◽  
Dieter Gerling ◽  
Achim Kampker
Keyword(s):  
Rare Earth ◽  
Design Optimization ◽  
Energy Efficient ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Computing Time ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Electric Motors ◽  
Electric Cars

Energy-efficient electric motors are gathering an increased attention since they are used in electric cars or to reduce operational costs, for instance. Due to their high efficiency, permanent-magnet synchronous motors are used progressively more. However, the need to use rare-earth magnets for such high-efficiency motors is problematic not only in regard to the cost but also in socio-political and environmental aspects. Therefore, an increasing effort has to be put in finding the best design possible. The goals to achieve are, among others, to reduce the amount of rare-earth magnet material but also to increase the efficiency. In the first part of this multipart paper, characteristics of optimization problems in engineering and general methods to solve them are presented. In part two, different approaches to the design optimization problem of electric motors are highlighted. The last part will evaluate the different categories of optimization methods with respect to the criteria: degrees of freedom, computing time and the required user experience. As will be seen, there is a conflict of objectives regarding the criteria mentioned above. Requirements, which a new optimization method has to fulfil in order to solve the conflict of objectives will be presented in this last paper.

Multi Objective Design Optimization of Two Bar Truss Using NSGA II and TOPSIS

2014 ◽  
Vol 984-985 ◽  
pp. 419-424
Author(s):  
P. Sabarinath ◽  
M.R. Thansekhar ◽  
R. Saravanan
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Total Displacement ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Conflicting Objectives

Arriving optimal solutions is one of the important tasks in engineering design. Many real-world design optimization problems involve multiple conflicting objectives. The design variables are of continuous or discrete in nature. In general, for solving Multi Objective Optimization methods weight method is preferred. In this method, all the objective functions are converted into a single objective function by assigning suitable weights to each objective functions. The main drawback lies in the selection of proper weights. Recently, evolutionary algorithms are used to find the nondominated optimal solutions called as Pareto optimal front in a single run. In recent years, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) finds increasing applications in solving multi objective problems comprising of conflicting objectives because of low computational requirements, elitism and parameter-less sharing approach. In this work, we propose a methodology which integrates NSGA-II and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for solving a two bar truss problem. NSGA-II searches for the Pareto set where two bar truss is evaluated in terms of minimizing the weight of the truss and minimizing the total displacement of the joint under the given load. Subsequently, TOPSIS selects the best compromise solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document