scholarly journals Minimum-Fuel Low-Earth Orbit Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer of Small Spacecraft

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 618-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Darby ◽  
Anil V. Rao
2016 ◽  
Vol 120 (1226) ◽  
pp. 573-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chudoba ◽  
G. Coleman ◽  
L. Gonzalez ◽  
E. Haney ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIn an effort to quantify the feasibility of candidate space architectures for astronauts servicing Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, a conceptual assessment of architecture-concept and operations-technology combinations has been performed. The focus has been the development of a system with the capability to transfer payload to and from geostationary orbit. Two primary concepts of operations have been selected: (a) Direct insertion/re-entry (Concept of Operations 1 – CONOP 1); (b) Launch to low-earth orbit at Kennedy Space Center inclination angle with an orbital transfer to/from geostationary orbit (Concept of Operations 2 – CONOP 2). The study concludes that a capsule and de-orbit propulsion module system sized for the geostationary satellite servicing mission is feasible for a direct insertion/re-entry concept of operation CONOP 1. Vehicles sized for CONOP 2 show overall total mass savings when utilising the aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicle de-orbit propulsion module options compared to the pure propulsive baseline cases. Overall, the consideration of technical, operational and cost factors determine if either the aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicle concepts or the re-usable/expendable ascent/de-orbit propulsion modules is the preferred option.


2010 ◽  
Vol 347 (10) ◽  
pp. 1863-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuebo Yang ◽  
Huijun Gao ◽  
Peng Shi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document