scholarly journals Shock-Tube Operation with Laser-Beam-Induced Diaphragm Rupture

AIAA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1110-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Sasoh ◽  
Toru Takahashi ◽  
Keiko Watanabe ◽  
Hiroyuki Torikai ◽  
Qian-Suo Yang
Author(s):  
Toru Takahashi ◽  
Keiko Watanabe ◽  
Akihiro Sasoh ◽  
Hiroyuki Torikai ◽  
Qian-Suo Yang

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (0) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Toru TAKAHASHI ◽  
Hiroyuki TORIKAI ◽  
Qian Suo YANG ◽  
Keiko WATANABE ◽  
Akihiro SASOH

Shock Waves ◽  
2005 ◽  
pp. 295-299
Author(s):  
T. Takahashi ◽  
H. Torikai ◽  
Q. S. Yang ◽  
K. Watanabe ◽  
A. Sasoh

Shock Waves ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-557
Author(s):  
G. Fukushima ◽  
T. Tamba ◽  
A. Iwakawa ◽  
A. Sasoh

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Rajagopal ◽  
Heuy Dong Kim ◽  
Toshiaki Setoguchi

Author(s):  
David W. Piston ◽  
Brian D. Bennett ◽  
Robert G. Summers

Two-photon excitation microscopy (TPEM) provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging and photochemistry. Two-photon excitation arises from the simultaneous absorption of two photons in a single quantitized event whose probability is proportional to the square of the instantaneous intensity. For example, two red photons can cause the transition to an excited electronic state normally reached by absorption in the ultraviolet. In practice, two-photon excitation is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10-5 maintains the average input power on the order of 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy.


Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Revel

The last few years have been marked by a series of remarkable developments in microscopy. Perhaps the most amazing of these is the growth of microscopies which use devices where the place of the lens has been taken by probes, which record information about the sample and display it in a spatial from the point of view of the context. From the point of view of the biologist one of the most promising of these microscopies without lenses is the scanned force microscope, aka atomic force microscope.This instrument was invented by Binnig, Quate and Gerber and is a close relative of the scanning tunneling microscope. Today's AFMs consist of a cantilever which bears a sharp point at its end. Often this is a silicon nitride pyramid, but there are many variations, the object of which is to make the tip sharper. A laser beam is directed at the back of the cantilever and is reflected into a split, or quadrant photodiode.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document