Najczęstsze powikłania transferu zarodków

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Kozikowska ◽  
Mirosław Grusza ◽  
Grzegorz Mrugacz ◽  
Cezary Grygoruk
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
The Other ◽  
Common Phenomenon ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Uterine Contractions ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Ivf Et

Embryo transfer (ET) has been recognized as a vital step which influences pregnancy rates in patients undergoing the in vitro fertilization process (IVF). The safe placement of embryos inside the uterine cavity is essential to obtain an optimal pregnancy rate. However, there is no guarantee that the embryos will remain in the uterine cavity after the procedure. Embryos have been found in catheters, on the cervix, and on the vaginal speculum. The performance of an atraumatic ET is essential to IVF success. The other factor influencing ET are contamination of the catheter with blood, mucus or endometrial tissue, as well as the occurrence of retained embryos. Embryo retention in the catheter is a common phenomenon, encountered by even the most experienced operators. Embryo retained in the transfer catheter or its sleeve require repeat transfer. Pregnancy rates after IVF-ET decrease in a stepwise fashion with the increasing frequency of uterine contractions. To achieve state of maximal uterus relaxation during embryo transfer it is advised to perform ET gently without excessive stimulation of the cervix. Despite revolutionary changes in the embryological laboratory, little has changed with process of ET over past 20 years. Even thought, ET seems to be relatively easy procedure it should be performed by the most experienced operators.

scholarly journals Comparative Study Between Mock Embryo Transfer Prior To The Treatment Cycle and Real Embryo Transfer In In Vitro Fertilization

KnE Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilma Putri Lubis
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Treatment Cycle ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rates

<p><strong>Introduction</strong><strong></strong></p><p>A trial or mock embryo transfer (ET) may influence pregnancy rates and it performed prior to ET allows the clinician to assess the uterine cavity and the utero-cervical angle. The aim of this study is to compare the consistency of the type of ET in mock ET with real ET.</p><p><strong>Material &amp; Methods</strong></p><p>A retrospective comparative analysis of  patients who underwent in vitro fertilization or ICSI cycle from January 2014 to December 2014 in Halim Fertility Center was done. The type of transfer was divided into two groups: ‘easy’ or ‘difficult’. An easy ET was defined as a transfer that occurred without the use of manipulation or other instrumentation and difficult ET was considered when additional instrumentation was required.</p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>From the study, 103 patients who underwent Mock-ET, we  found 58 patients (56.3%) with easy ET and 45 patients (43.7%) with difficult ET, which with hard catheter ET in 17 patients (16.5%), with osfander assistance in 20 patients (19.4%) and with stylet in 8 patients (7,8%). 58 patients with Easy Mock ET group were entirely easy real ET (100%) and 45 patients with difficult Mock ET group also entirely were difficult real ET (100%). The Statistical analysis shows no significant difference between the mock ET and real ET groups (p&gt;0,05). In easy real ET, clinical pregnancy rates were 32.8% and in difficult real ET, clinical pregnancy rates were 26.7% with no significant difference between the  groups (p&gt;0,05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p><p>Mock ET prior to the treatment cycle is consistent with real ET.</p>

scholarly journals Effect of hysteroscopic examination on the outcome of in vitro fertilization

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Trninic-Pjevic ◽  
Vesna Kopitovic ◽  
Sonja Pop-Trajkovic ◽  
Artur Bjelica ◽  
Irena Bujas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Transvaginal Sonography ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pregnancy And Delivery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ivf Et

Bacground/Aim. Implantation failure after embryo transfer is one of the main problems of in vitro fartilization (IVF) and intrauterine pathologies can lead to unsuccessful outcome. The aim of this study was to determine if hysteroscopic examination of uterine cavity and consequent treatment of intrauterine lesions prior to IVF could improve the pregnancy rate in women under 38. Methods. This study included 480 patients under 38, who had undergone IVF or IVF\ICSI - embryo transfer cycles, in which one or more good quality embryos were transferred. By transvaginal sonography performed within the past 2 months, the uterus was found normal in all the patients enrolled in our IVF unit. The patients were divided into three groups: group A - with no hysteroscopic evaluation and no pathology, group B - with hysteroscopy but no pathology, and group C - with abnormal hysteroscopy finding and corresponding treatment. Results. The obtained results revaled no difference in the mean age, duration of infertility, number of mature oocytes in either group (p > 0.05). Clinical pregnancy rates in the groups A, B and C were 36.9%, 58.75% and 32.7%, respectively, and delivery rates were 27.5%, 48.7% and 25.7%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference among the groups concerning pregnancy and delivery rates. Conclusion. Considering the results of this study we could conclude that hysteroscopy, as a routine examination, should be performed before the first IVF-ET cycle in all patients thereby reducing the failures and then the costs of IVF-ET.

scholarly journals The presence of microorganisms in follicular fluid and its effect on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment cycles

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246644
Author(s):  
Safiyya Faruk Usman ◽  
Ibraheem Rais Shuaibu ◽  
Korede Durojaiye ◽  
Nubwa Medugu ◽  
Kenneth Chukwuemeka Iregbu
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Follicular Fluid ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Fungal Colonization ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Bacteria And Fungi ◽  
Ivf Et

Objectives To determine if the presence of microorganisms in follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) adversely affects the outcome of the treatment cycles. Methods Follicular fluid was collected from 86 women enrolled for IVF-ET at the National Hospital, Abuja from June 1, 2018 to December 1, 2018. Microscopy imaging and cultures were performed to identify bacteria and fungi in the follicular fluid and the vagina. Women with follicular fluid microorganisms were the test group while the controls were those without follicular fluid microorganisms. Fertilization and pregnancy rates were subsequently determined and their association with the presence of follicular fluid microorganisms was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression modelling. Results The mean age and mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of the participants were 35(± 3.5) years and 28(± 4.9) kg/m2 respectively. Bacteria and fungi were isolated in 17% of the follicular fluid samples collected (n = 15/86). Most common isolates were Streptococcus spp. (n = 4/15), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7/15), Enterococcus spp. (n = 4/15), Lactobacillus species (n = 2/15) and Candida albicans (n = 2/15). There was no statistically significant difference in the fertilization rates (adjusted odds ratio [AdjOR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04–7.34; P = 0.10) and pregnancy rates (AdjOR 4.02, 95% CI 0.56–28.92; P = 0.19) between the group of women with positive follicular fluid bacterial /fungal colonization as compared against those with negative follicular fluid colonization. Conclusion Isolation of microorganisms from follicular fluid did not adversely affect fertilization and pregnancy rates following IVF-ET treatment cycles at the fertility centre of National Hospital, Abuja.

scholarly journals The role of Anti-Mullerian hormone in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles at a public fertility centre in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safiyya Faruk Usman ◽  
Olubunmi Peter Ladipo ◽  
J.A.F Momoh ◽  
Chris Ovoroyeguono Agboghoroma ◽  
Nabila Datti Abubakar
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Confounding Variables ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ivf Et

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the role of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) in predicting fertilization and pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment cycles.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of one hundred and fifty consecutive women undergoing IVF-ET/ICSI that were recruited from February 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018 at the Fertility centre of the National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria. Participants’ plasma AMH were assayed and were followed up till achieving fertilization and pregnancy. Association between AMH levels, fertilization and pregnancy rates was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression modelling to adjust for confounding variables.ResultsThe mean age and mean AMH level of the participants were 36 ± 4.2 years and 1.74 ± 2.35ng/ml respectively. There was a statistically significant association between AMH level and age (P <0.001), duration of infertility (P =0.026), cause of infertility (P =0.035), number of oocytes retrieved (P =<0.001), number of embryos generated (P =<0.001) and type of treatment (P =<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the fertilization rates (adjusted odds ratio [AdjOR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–4.30; P =0.533) and pregnancy rates (AdjOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04–2.00; P =0.210) at different plasma levels of AMH.ConclusionPlasma AMH level was not a predictor of fertilization and pregnancy rates among our cohort of patients who had IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document