scholarly journals Implementation of Double Track System in Conviction Towards Special Expertise Crime

Ius Poenale ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Ahmad Aditya Putra Utama ◽  
Heru Suyanto
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Research Institution ◽  
Track System ◽  
On Line ◽  
Special Expertise ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Double Track ◽  
The Ideal

Sentencing must be guided by the principle of quae sunt minoris culpae sunt majoris infamiae (cruel crimes will be punished with cruel punishment). However, there must be a limit to the punishment (poenae sunt restringenade). In its implementation, the imposition of crimes against convicted people often creates ongoing problems in people's lives. Instead of aiming to popularize the convicts, in fact the imposition of crimes often causes suffering to the perpetrator and even his family. This study aims to determine the basis for justifying the imposition of sanctions in the punishment of criminals with special skills and to formulate the ideal concept of punishment for convicts with special skills in the future. This research is a normative legal research; the data source in this study uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The approach in this research uses a statutory approach, a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the basis for justifying the imposition of sanctions for criminal acts with special expertise is the Mark system of penalties. The use of the Double Track System in the punishment of convicts who have special expertise in the field of science so that it is in line with the criminal purpose of providing education, in addition to being convicted with the main crime, the convict is also subject to acts in the form of social work by teaching/transforming the knowledge/expertise possessed to people, many through certain educational/research institution/institutions online (on line).

MANAJEMEN PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH DILAHAT DARI PERUNDANGAN-UNDANGAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Hotma Napitupulu, MM.
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Empirical Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Regulatory Oversight ◽  
Secondary Data Source ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Law ◽  
Harmonization Of Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Management of regulatory oversight under the law, analyze the legal consequences with its use as a system of legal oversight mechanisms in order to create harmonization of law in the region. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source.

scholarly journals Disparitas Pidana Pada Penyalahguna Narkotika

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 823
Author(s):  
Berliandista Yustianjarnimas Irianto
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Track System ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Double Track

Beberapa putusan pada tindak pidana Narkotika terdapat perbedaan penjatuhan hukuman pidana terhadap perkara yang sama atau serupa. Hal tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan di kalangan masyarakat apakah yang menyebabkan perbedaan tersebut. Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika sendiri dikenal adanya double track system, yakni menerapkan sanksi pidana dan sanksi tindakan. Salah satu sanksi yang identik dengan Tindak Pidana Narkotika adalah Sanski Rehabilitasi. Rehabilitasi sangat bermanfaat dalam penyembuhan pecandu dan korban penyalahguna Narkotika, begitupun penyalahguna. Rehabilitasi diberikan oleh penyidik sesuai dengan kewenangan dan syarat – syarat yang telah ditentukan oleh Undang – Undang salah satunya dengan adanya Surat Asesmen yang dikeluarkan oleh Tim Asesmen Terpadu. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, penulis menggunakan penelitian hukum dengan Pendekatan Perundang - undangan (Statute Approach), Pendekatan Konseptual (Conceptual Approach), dan Pendekatan Kasus (Case Approach). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis disparitas pidana pada penjatuhan putusan yang berbeda bagi penyalahguna Narkotika dan menganalisis Ratio Decidendi putusan hakim terhadap penyalahguna Narkotika.

scholarly journals REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA DI TINJAU DARI SISTEM PEMIDANAAN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syafruddin Syafruddin
Keyword(s):  
Medical Rehabilitation ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Role Of Government ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Track System ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Double Track

ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the increasingly widespread use of narcotic in Indonesia, while the illegal use of narcotics can be viewed as a crime that can be imposed criminal sanctions in accordance with the provisions of Law of 35 of 2009. This narcotic law, in the case of punishment to the narcotic user, adheres to double track system, namely repressive sanction and action sanction. Medical rehabilitation is one of the framework of action sanction. On that basis, this research refers to two objectives: Analyzing the existence of rehabilitation for narcotic user in the perspective of the Indonesian punishment system and Analyzing the consequences for rehabilitation in cases of narcotic crime.This research is a legal research with normative law research type. The analytical approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used in this study are primary and secondary legal materials. Primary sources of law relate to written legal products and secular sources of law covering other relevant literature.The results of research show that the existence of rehabilitation for narcotic user in the perspective of the Indonesian punishment system, is basically one of the forms of sanction which must be undertaken by the user of narcotic who is not the category of dealer, because the philosophy of Law of 35 on 2009 on Narcotic adheres to double track system in the case of sanction for the narcotic user, namely a repressive witness and action sanction, so it can be argued that  rehabilitation is a manifestation of the sanction of such action. Furthermore, the determination of rehabilitation for narcotic user based on a judge's ruling may have consequences for drug user to undergo medical rehabilitation as a duty.. Furthermore, the role of government is very important through the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to streamline community participation in the framework of medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation procedures that are very urgent for the recovery of health and mental recovery of those who have become victims of narcotics. Keywords : Rehabilitation, Criminal Sanction, and Narcotic User 

scholarly journals PENGGUNAAN DAN BATAS DISKRESI DALAM PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-187
Author(s):  
Tri Suhendra Arbani
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Public ◽  
Regional Finance ◽  
Analysis Technique

Regional finance is the most important thing and becomes the pulse in carrying out all regional government affairs. Regulation in the financial sector is important because many regional heads carry out transportation for corruption because they are wrong in managing and making policies that have no legal basis. In this paper, we try to examine problems such as the changing room for discretion and the discretionary limitation in managing regional finances. This type of research used in this paper is normative legal research, that is research conducted or based on written regulations and other legal materials related to secondary data. In this legal research is used to discuss: statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The data analysis technique in writing uses data management in essence the activities to make a system of written legal materials. The results of this paper describe how you should use discretion. This concept of discretion comes in the middle of a weak system of registration of invitations and legal vacuum. In essence, government officials take discretionary measures if they ask for various terms and discussion spaces from the discretion itself that has been regulated in government administration laws. These restrictions on the use of discretion indicate that not everything can be taken as a discretionary measure. Using ermessen freis or discretion basically covers the use of ermessen freis cannot replace with the prevailing legal system (positive legal rules) and the use of ermessen freis is only in the public interest.

scholarly journals Pengaturan Rangkap Jabatan Notaris dengan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Bima Ridho Halim ◽  
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Evaluation Techniques ◽  
The Ideal ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of writing this article is to discuss the harmonization of regulation towards a double position of notary and members of the House of Representatives and the ideal formulation of regulations regarding dual notary positions. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed using grammatical, systematic, interpretation, explanatory, and evaluation techniques. Harmonization of laws and regulations relating to someone who holds a concurrent position as a notary and a member of the House of Representatives is very important to meet legal certainty. The notary who is elected as a member of the House of Representatives must release his position as a notary public. Notaries can be re-becoming a notary public if they are no longer members of the House of Representatives.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Penanggulangan Bencana di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Marfuah Marfuah ◽  
◽  
Sinta Cempaka ◽  
Ahmad Risdan Ardiansyah ◽  
Laila Rahmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Management ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Disaster Mitigation ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Development Plans ◽  
The Government ◽  
Future Evaluation

Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to seek consideration for disaster mitigation planning through observations of disasters that have occurred before. and can be used in decision-making regarding natural disaster management. Research methodology: This research used a descriptive method with a secondary data approach and implemented a conceptual approach accompanied by a comparative approach. Results: The results of this study, namely the orientation of disaster mitigation objectives, show that there is a process related to the preparation of development plans for both regions and cities and disaster management, as well as providing a general picture to the community regarding the stages of government making policy decisions in disaster management and disaster anticipation for communities affected by disasters. Limitations: The limitations in this study are regarding disaster mitigation, the process of making plans for the future, both at the regional and central levels, through the analysis and research process on previous policies as consideration and future evaluation for disaster prevention measures and structured planning for the worst possible disaster. Contribution: This research can be used as a reference to understand the context of disaster mitigation by the government and material for consideration in making decisions about what to take to plan future disaster management from existing disaster experiences.

scholarly journals Direction of Regulating Catcall Actions in Law: Comparison of Indonesia and France Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyne Julian Halim
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Public Places ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
Loss Of Self ◽  
Women And Children

Various forms of harassment in the world are increasing, including in Indonesia. Women and children are the most frequent victims of sexual harassment, but it does not rule out that men can become victims. Catcalling is an act that has sexual implications for the victim with teasing, whistling, screaming, comments, and even eye contact on the street or in public places. Sexual harassment negatively impacts victims such as shame, offense, humiliation, anger, loss of self-esteem, loss of chastity, depression, etc. Writing this scientific article aims to provide reference material for lawmakers regarding the ideal regulation of street harassment, especially catcalling. Then, give the readers an understanding of catcalling and the urgency of its rule in Indonesian legislation. The research method used in this scientific article is a normative juridical method with data collection techniques using literature study by examining secondary data, namely statutory regulations, other legal documents, research results, assessment results, and other references. This study uses a statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. This verbal sexual harassment has been taken seriously in several countries, one of which is France. In France, this anti-catcalling Law is known as Loi Schiappa. Loi Schiappa gave direct fines to the perpetrators of catcalling. In Indonesia, there is no regulation regarding catcalling, resulting in a legal vacuum. Indonesia can follow the model of the French Catcalling arrangement, which uses direct fines on the spot. So that provides legal certainty as well as protects the human rights of victims of catcalling.

scholarly journals FENOMENA HUKUM AKIBAT MEKANISME CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM DAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN UTILITARIANISME

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190
Author(s):  
Saut Parulian Manurung
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Track System ◽  
Double Track

AbstractIn this study aims to determine the legal phenomena that arise as a result of the criminal justice system, as a reflection of the development of criminal law both at the theoretical and practical level. The findings in this research are based on two approaches namely the statute approach as an approach based on the rule of law and the conceptual approach based on the conceptual approach. There are 3 (three) findings of legal phenomena in this study, namely: first, the presence of a double track system in the criminal mechanism in Indonesia. Secondly, there is a phenomenon of paradigm shifting the character of punishment in Indonesia and third, re-measuring restorative justice in the form of diversion mechanism based on the perspective of utilitarianism. In principle, crime is always closely related to criminal sanctions, but in the double track criminal system is directed at criminal actions. On the other hand, the phenomenon of paradigm shift in the character of punishment occurs in the juvenile justice system, namely the approach to criminal responsibility is done by bargaining an agreement between the perpetrators, victims and community involvement. Furthermore, measuring restorative justice based on a utility perspective, this finding found coherence between restorative justice in the form of diversion and utilitarianism. Therefore, the overall legal phenomena above are some manifestations of the legal reality that is present in the criminal system in Indonesia.Keywords: criminal paradigm shift; double track system; utilitarianismAbstrakPada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fenomena-fenomena hukum yang timbul akibat dari sistem peradilan pidana, sebagai suatu refleksi atas perkembangan hukum pidana baik pada tataran teoritis maupun praktik. Penemuan dalam penelitian didasari dengan dua pendekatan yaitu statute approach sebagai suatu pendekatan berdasarkan peraturan undang-undang dan conceptual approach yang didasari dengan pendekatan koseptual. Terdapat 3 (tiga) temuan fenomena hukum dalam penelitian ini yaitu: pertama, hadirnya double track system dalam mekanisme pemidanaan di Indonesia. Kedua, adanya fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan di Indonesia dan ketiga, menakar kembali keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk mekanisme diversi berdasarkan perspektif utilitarianisme. Pada prinsipnya kejahatan tindak pidana selalu erat hubungannya dengan pidana sanksi namun dalam double track system pemidanaan diarahkan pada pidana tindakan. Di sisi lain, fenomena pergeseran paradigma karakter pemidanaan terjadi pada sistem peradilan pidana anak, yaitu pendekatan pertanggungjawaban pidana dilakukkan dengan cara bargaining kesepakatan antara pelaku, korban dan keterlibatan masyarakat. Selanjutnya menakar keadilan restoratif berdasarkan perspektif utilitis, dalam temuan ini ditemukan koherensi antara keadilan restoratif dalam bentuk diversi dengan aliran utilitarianisme. Oleh karena itu, keseluruhan fenomena-fenomena hukum tersebut diatas merupakan beberapa wujud kenyataan hukum yang hadir di sistem pidana di Indonesia.Kata kunci: double track system, pergeseran paradigma pidana, utilitarianisme

Efforts to Realize Legal Certainty of Land Ownership in Lampung through Blocking of Land Certificate

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Meutia Safitri
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Right

Article 19 of the UUPA states that land registration is carried out as a way to guarantee legal certainty of land rights. The Land Office will issue a certificate of land rights for rights holders. Therefore, the right holder is obliged to register at the local Land Office if there is a transfer or assignment of rights. This study aims to determine: 1) the legal status of the blocked land certificate, and 2) the legal certainty of the land title certificate when the registration of the block has passed 30 days or there has been a court decision regarding the block. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The data analysis used is qualitative in the form of descriptive analytical. The data source used is in the form of secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that: 1) the legal status of the blocked land title certificate is that transitional legal actions and land rights are imposed. 2) The legal certainty of a land title certificate when the registration of the block has passed 30 days is the restoration of the legal status of the land title certificate holder.

PENERAPAN PRINSIP “KEPENTINGAN TERBAIK BAGI ANAK” DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun ◽  
Samsudi Samsudi
Keyword(s):  
Drug Users ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Expert Witnesses ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Track System ◽  
Secondary Data Sources ◽  
Rehabilitation Measures ◽  
Double Track

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 229/Pid.B/2012/PN.Jpr memutuskan sanksi pidana penjara terhadap anak pengguna narkotika, tanpa disertai tindakan rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Kewajiban pemeriksaan dokter ahli jiwa untuk menentukan urgensi tindakan rehabilitasi telah dikesampingkan oleh hakim di dalam memutus kasus. Permasalahan yang dikaji meliputi urgensi keterangan ahli dalam pemeriksaan ajudikasi tindak pidana narkotika dan aplikasi prinsip "kepentingan terbaik bagi anak" dalam penjatuhan sanksi terhadap anak pengguna narkotika. Metode penulisan berbasis pada penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder. Data penelitian berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif, yaitu penelitian hukum kualitatif (qualitative-legal research). Penjatuhan sanksi pidana penjara tanpa tindakan rehabilitasi terhadap anak pengguna narkotika tidak sejalan dengan tujuan pemidanaan. Prinsip individualisasi pidana dan prinsip double track system sebenarnya dapat diterapkan dalam kasus tindak pidana narkotika oleh pelaku anak. Hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi terhadap anak seharusnya berorientasi pada prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, sehingga pemidanaan terhadap anak, khususnya pidana perampasan kemerdekaan digunakan sebagai upaya terakhir (ultimum remedium).Kata kunci: keterangan ahli, pertanggungjawaban pidana, hukum pembuktian. ABSTRACTThe Court Decision Number 229/Pid.B/2012/PN.Jpr imposed sanctions of imprisonment against the children of drug users without any of medical and social rehabilitation measures. The provision on the examination of the psychiatrist to settle on the urgency of rehabilitation measures have been ruled out by the judges in deciding the case. The problems outlined embrace the urgency of testifying expert witnesses in the adjudication of narcotic crime case and the implementation of the "best interests of the child" measure in the imposition of sanction on the children of drug users. The analytical method used is based on normative legal research using secondary data sources. The research data are in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were analyzed qualitatively through a method of qualitative legal research. Imposing sanction of imprisonment with no rehabilitation measures on the children of drug users is inconsistent with the objective of sentencing. The principle of individualization of punishment and double track system can actually be implemented in the case of narcotic crime involving children offender. The judge in imposing sanctions on the children should be oriented to the measure of best interests of children, so that conviction for a criminal offence against children, particularly deprivation of liberty is done as a last resort (ultimum remedium).Keywords: expert witnesses, criminal responsibility, rules of evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document