VISION EXPERIMENT ON CHROMA SATURATION PREFERENCE IN DIFFERENT HUES

Author(s):  
Yoshi Ohno ◽  
Youngshin Kwak ◽  
Semi Oh
Keyword(s):  

Adaptation of the human eye to long-wavelength light leaves it insensitive to short-wavelengths: a blue flash that is visible in the presence of a yellow adapting field may remain invisible for several seconds after the field has been turned off (see experiment 1 and Appendix). This ‘transient tritanopia’ occurs for a large range of adapting intensities, but is abolished if the adapting field is very bright (experiment 2). The loss of sensitivity is primarily confined to the blue-sensitive cone mechanism (experiments 2 a , 3 and 4 ; and Appendix) and can be produced by small attenuations of the adapting field (experiment 5). It occurs in both foveal and parafoveal vision (experiment 6) but is absent when adapting and test stimuli are presented to opposite eyes (experiment 7). It was found in a protanope (experiment 9 a ) and, in a modified form, in a deuteranope (experiment 9 b ). No differences in sensitivity were found for blue flashes presented in the light and dark phases of a field flickering at a rate above the fusion frequency (Appendix). The sensitivity of the blue-sensitive mechanism of the eye appears to be controlled not only by quanta absorbed by the blue receptors but also by a mechanism with a different spectral sensitivity


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kawashima ◽  
Y. Ohno

The purpose of this study is to quantify the Hunt Effect in a range from indoor lighting levels to outdoor daylight levels so that a perception model of Hunt Effect for lighting can be developed with outdoor daylight as the reference. Our previous study experimentally quantified the perceived chroma changes due to the Hunt Effect at 100 lx and 1000 lx. To extend this to light levels closer to outdoor daylight, a vision experiment was conducted at ≈1000 lx and ≈6000 lx for red, green, yellow, and blue patches. A reference patch on one side of a double booth at 1000 lx was compared to a set of 20 test patches on the other side of the booth at ≈6000 lx using haploscopic view condition. Results showed that the perceived chroma changes are much smaller and insignificant compared to the results between 100 lx and 1000 lx found in our previous study.


1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-254
Author(s):  
D Lovett ◽  
K Hore

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Leander Kamermans ◽  
Wim T. J. L. Pouw ◽  
Luisa Fassi ◽  
Asimina Aslanidou ◽  
Fred Paas ◽  
...  

In the current confirmatory study, we conducted two experiments that examined the role of gesture in reinterpreting a mental image. In the first experiment, we observed that participants gestured more about figures they had learned through manual exploration than about figures they had learned through vision. Experiment 2 investigated whether such gestures have a causal role in affecting the quality of mental imagery by manipulating participants’ gesture activity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 0633001 ◽  
Author(s):  
马瑞青 Ma Ruiqing ◽  
廖宁放 Liao Ningfang ◽  
篠森敬三 Shinomori Keizo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Ponzo ◽  
Louise P. Kirsch ◽  
Aikaterini Fotopoulou ◽  
Paul M. Jenkinson

AbstractBackgroundThe vestibular system has been shown to contribute to multisensory integration by balancing conflictual sensory information. It remains unclear whether such modulation of exteroceptive (e.g. vision), proprioceptive and interoceptive (e.g. affective touch) sensory sources is influenced by epistemically different aspects of tactile stimulation (i.e. felt from within vs seen, vicarious touch).ObjectiveWe aimed to i) replicate previous findings regarding the effects of galvanic stimulation of the right vestibular network (i.e. LGVS) in multisensory integration and ii) examine vestibular contributions to multisensory integration when touch is felt but not seen (and vice-versa).MethodDuring artificial vestibular stimulation (LGVS, RGVS and Sham), healthy participants (N=36, Experiment 1; N=37, Experiment 2) looked at a rubber hand while either their own unseen hand or the rubber hand were touched by affective or neutral touch.ResultsWe found that i) LGVS led to enhancement of vision over proprioception during visual only conditions (replicating our previous findings), and ii) LGVS (vs Sham) favoured proprioception over vision when touch was felt (Experiment 1), with the opposite results when touch was vicariously perceived via vision (Experiment 2), and with no difference between affective and neutral touch.ConclusionsWe showed how vestibular signals modulate the weight of each sensory modality according to the context in which they are perceived and that such modulation extends to different aspects of tactile stimulation: felt and seen touch are differentially balanced in multisensory integration according to their epistemic relevance.HighlightsLGVS increased proprioceptive drift during vision of a rubber handTouch on participant’s hand decreased proprioceptive drift during LGVSVicarious touch on the Rubber Hand increased proprioceptive drift during LGVSVestibular signals differently balance sensory sources in multisensory integration


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document