The study of used battery recycling program: research based on 30 communities in Wuhan

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjuan Tao ◽  
Liang Ai
Keyword(s):  
Battery Recycling ◽  
Program Research

ELECTRIC VEHICLE BATTERY RECYCLING: SYSTEM DYNAMICS GAME BASED ANALYSIS FOR THE INFLUENCING FACTORS

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1123-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Mu ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Jianbang Du ◽  
Yongwei Cheng ◽  
Salman Hanif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
System Dynamics ◽  
Electric Vehicle ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Recycling System ◽  
Battery Recycling ◽  
Electric Vehicle Battery

scholarly journals Lithium ion battery recycling using high-intensity ultrasonication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
chunhong lei ◽  
Iain M Aldous ◽  
Jennifer Hartley ◽  
Dana Thompson ◽  
Sean Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Ion Batteries ◽  
Lithium Ion Battery ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Battery Recycling

Decarbonisation of energy will rely heavily, at least initially, on the use of lithium ion batteries for automotive transportation. The projected volumes of batteries necessitate the development of fast and...

Accounting Doctoral Program Rankings Based on Research Productivity of Program Graduates

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel M. Stephens ◽  
Scott L. Summers ◽  
Brady Williams ◽  
David A. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Academic Programs ◽  
Accounting Information Systems ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Program Research

SYNOPSIS: This paper presents rankings of accounting doctoral programs based on the research productivity of each institution’s graduates in the years immediately following their graduation. We use two time periods for analysis: the first three years after graduation and the first six years after graduation. We extend previous doctoral program ranking literature by expanding rankings of accounting doctoral programs with specific rankings for topical areas (accounting information systems [AIS], audit, financial, managerial, and tax) and methodologies (analytical, archival, and experimental). We show that rankings for topical and methodological areas differ significantly from rankings produced using methodologies that create a singular doctoral program ranking. These results emphasize the importance of considering topical and methodological areas when assessing doctoral program research strengths. These rankings should be of value to Ph.D. program applicants, administrators of academic programs, and industry—such as administrators of programs like the Accounting Doctoral Scholars program, KPMG Ph.D. Project, and prospective Ph.D. students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document