scholarly journals Evaluation of lateral load pattern in pushover analysis

Author(s):  
S. I. Javadein ◽  
R. Taghinezhad
2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 4013-4016
Author(s):  
Li Zhe Jia ◽  
Zhong Dong Duan

The uncertainties of earthquake currently were not considered with the various lateral load patterns of pushover. The convex set theory, which requires much less information, is employed to model the uncertainties of the seismic influence coefficient maximum and the characteristic period of response spectrum. Then the convex analysis method is integrated into the fundamental equation of pushover, and the analytic relationship of lateral seismic load and top displacement of buildings is derived. The results of numerical example shows that the new lateral load pattern of pushover proposed in this research may effective simulate the uncertainties of strong ground motion.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Gholi Pour ◽  
M. Ansari ◽  
M. Bayat

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1955
Author(s):  
Azin Akbari ◽  
Erfan Ordookhani ◽  
Mohammad Reza Pasaeian

In the most of regulations, reduction factor of seismic force depends only on the kind of lateral loading system, but research has shown that this factor is a function of many factors such as period and modal characteristics of the structure, the height and especially form of plan in the building. Due to the complexity of nonlinear dynamic analysis method, today, nonlinear static analysis method called pushover, as a practical appropriate tool has developed in field of earthquake engineering based on function frequently. But traditional pushover analysis method have defects that can be noted Including the stability of lateral load pattern form, did not consider the impact of higher modes or impact of more efficient modes and lack of consideration of the stiffness matrix of member or the entire of structure changes in step of analysis. In recent years a number of researchers have proposed using adaptive load pattern, in this methods, lateral load pattern have changed and adapting in during analysis based on momentary stiffness matrix of structures. In this paper we investigate the response modification factor in L-shaped geometric asymmetry by using SAP software, Pushover analysis used in this study is divided into two categories pushover with constant load pattern (traditional method) and pushover with the adaptive load pattern (adaptive). So, it is studied building with L-shaped asymmetrical plan, with moment frame double structural system - bracing and number of floors 5, 10, 15 and 20, with four different bracing plan types at considering frames, and the end were compared obtained response modification factor from the two methods for these buildings.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Jingjiang ◽  
Tetsuro Ono ◽  
Zhao Yangang ◽  
Wang Wei

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1233
Author(s):  
Albert Albert ◽  
Daniel Christianto ◽  
Hadi Pranata

ABSTRACTAlthough elastic analysis gives a good indication of the elastic capacity and behavior of a building, but the elastic method can’t predict when the first yield will occur, and the failure mechanism and account for redistribution of member forces when the plastic hinges progressively formed. The use of inelastic procedure for evaluation is an attempt made by engineer in the past days to better understand how the structure will behave when subjected to strong earthquake, assuming the elastic capacity of the structure will be exceeded. In this research the pushover analysis was done using the modelling criteria of FEMA 356. The modeling of C-flanged shear was done using line element with the equivalent strength and stiffness properties. Target displacement was calculated using the displacement coefficient method of FEMA 356. Based on the analysis the triangular load pattern resulted in larger target displacement than the uniform load. But the uniform load pattern gives larger seismic response than the triangular load pattern. The uniform load pattern resulted in Life Safety performance level, while the triangular load pattern resulted in Immediate Occupancy, based on the two load patterns used the structure resulted in Life Safety performance level.ABSTRAKWalaupun analisis elastik memberikan indikasi yang baik mengenai kapasitas dan perilaku elastik dari suatu gedung, tetapi metode elastik tidak dapat memperkirakan kapan pelelehan pertama terjadi, serta mekanisme kegagalan apa yang mungkin terjadi pada bangunan tersebut, dan memperkirakan redistribusi dari gaya- gaya dalam ketika pembentukan sendi plastis secara progresif terjadi. Fungsi dari analisis inelastik, sebagai prosedur untuk mengevaluasi bangunan, yang merupakan usaha dari insinyur-insinyur terdahulu memahami bagaimana struktur akan berperilaku apabila dikenai gempa kuat, dimana diasumsikan bahwa kapasitas elastik gedung telah terlampaui. Dalam penelitian ini dilakukan pushover analysis menggunakan kriteria pemodelan berdasarkan FEMA 356. Pemodelan dari dinding geser bersayap C dilakukan menggunakan line element dengan kekuatan dan kekakuan yang ekivalen. Target perpindahan dianalisis menggunakan metode coefficient of displacement dari FEMA 356. Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan didapat bahwa pembebanan segitiga lebih besar dibandingkan pembebanan merata. Namun, respons seismik yang didapat akibat beban merata, lebih besar dibandingkan beban segitiga. Pembebanan merata menghasilkan tingkatan kinerja Life Safety, sedangkan pembebanan segitiga menghasilkan tingkatan kinerja Immadiate Occupancy, berdasarkan kedua pembebanan tersebut didapat kinerja dari struktur tersebut adalah Life Safety.


2020 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 106287
Author(s):  
Parham Ghaderi ◽  
Horr Khosravi ◽  
Ali Rahmani Firoozjaee
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document