scholarly journals American Woodcock Singing-Ground Survey Sampling of Forest Type and Age

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1794-1802
Author(s):  
Brian G. Tavernia ◽  
Mark D. Nelson ◽  
Rebecca Rau ◽  
James D. Garner ◽  
Charles H. Perry

Author(s):  
John R Sauer ◽  
William A. Link ◽  
Mark E. Seamans ◽  
Rebecca D. Rau

Status and trends of American Woodcock Scolopax minor populations in the eastern and central US and Canada are monitored via a Singing-ground Survey , conducted just after sunset along roadsides in spring.  Annual analyses of the survey produce estimates of trend and annual indexes of abundance for 25 states and provinces, eastern and central management regions, and survey-wide.  In recent years, a log-linear hierarchical model that defines year effects as random effects in the context of a slope parameter (the S Model) has been used to model population change. Recently, alternative models have been proposed for analysis of Singing-ground Survey data.  Analysis of a similar roadside survey, the North American Breeding Bird Survey , has indicated that alternative models are preferable for almost all species analyzed in the Breeding Bird Survey.  Here, we use leave-one-out cross validation to compare model fit for the present Singing-ground Survey model to fits of three alternative models, including a model that describes population change as the difference in expected counts between successive years (the D model) and two models that include t -distributed extra-Poisson overdispersion effects (H models) as opposed to normally-distributed extra-Poisson overdispersion.   Leave-one-out cross validation results indicate that the D model was favored by the Bayesian predictive information criterion but a pairwise t -test indicated that model D was not significantly better-fitting to Singing-ground Survey data than the S model.  The H models are not preferable to the alternatives with normally-distributed overdispersion.   All models provided generally similar estimates of trend and annual indexes suggesting that, within this model set, choice of model will not lead to alternative conclusions regarding population change.  However, as in Breeding Bird Survey analyses, we note a tendency for S model results to provide slightly more extreme estimates of trend relative to D models.   We recommend use of the D model for future Singing-ground Survey analyses.


1991 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Sauer ◽  
James Bradley Bortner

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 2046-2054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry R. Longcore ◽  
Daniel G. McAuley ◽  
Greg F. Sepik ◽  
Grey W. Pendleton

We radio-marked 150 male American woodcock (Scolopax minor) during 1987–1989 and estimated period survival for 1 April – 15 June. Survival varied from 0.690 (1989) to 0.924 (1988), with a 3-year mean (95% confidence interval) of 0.789 (0.693–0.885). Woodcock were killed by raptors (n = 14, 53.8%), mammals (n = 1, 3.8%), or unknown predators (n = 5, 19.2%); six deaths (23.1%) were from miscellaneous causes, including three (11.5%) from entanglement in the transmitter harness. A composite survival estimate based on telemetry studies for the breeding, postbreeding, and wintering periods was 0.471 (0.789 × 0.923 × 0.647). The calculated survival rates were 0.881 for the spring migration period and 0.853 for the combined hunting and fall migration period. In a proportional hazards model, body mass at capture was not related to survival. Forest type (hardwood versus conifers) affected survival (P < 0.016), which was lower for woodcock using mostly conifer sites. Survival was related positively to mean snow depth in December (P < 0.038), negatively to snow depth in April (P < 0.046), and positively to minimum temperature in December (P < 0.054) and April (P < 0.066) in some analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document