scholarly journals Centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis' velocities and accelerations in $$ (\bar L_n ,g) $$ -spaces

Open Physics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sawa Manoff
Keyword(s):  
Relative Velocity ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Gravitational Acceleration ◽  
Einstein Theory ◽  
Centripetal Acceleration ◽  
Affine Connections ◽  
Relative Acceleration ◽  
Kinematic Characteristics ◽  
Gravitational Theories ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation

AbstractThe notions of centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis' velocities and accelerations are introduced and considered in spaces with affine connections and metrics [ $$ (\bar L_n ,g) $$ -spaces] as velocities and accelerations of flows of mass elements (particles) moving in space-time. It is shown that these types of velocities and accelerations are generated by the relative motions between the mass elements. They are closely related to the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity and relative acceleration. The centrifugal (centripetal) velocity is found to be in connection with the Hubble law. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration could be interpreted as gravitational acceleration as has been done in the Einstein theory of gravitation. This fact could be used as a basis for workingout new gravitational theories in spaces with affine connections and metrics.

scholarly journals Post-Newtonian limit: second-order Jefimenko equations

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pérez Carlos ◽  
Augusto Espinoza ◽  
Andrew Chubykalo
Keyword(s):  
Linear Equations ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Gravitational Fields ◽  
Mass Distributions ◽  
Minkowski Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
Gravity Probe ◽  
Gravitational Equations

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to get second-order gravitational equations, a correction made to Jefimenko’s linear gravitational equations. These linear equations were first proposed by Oliver Heaviside in [1], making an analogy between the laws of electromagnetism and gravitation. To achieve our goal, we will use perturbation methods on Einstein field equations. It should be emphasized that the resulting system of equations can also be derived from Logunov’s non-linear gravitational equations, but with different physical interpretation, for while in the former gravitation is considered as a deformation of space-time as we can see in [2–5], in the latter gravitation is considered as a physical tensor field in the Minkowski space-time (as in [6–8]). In Jefimenko’s theory of gravitation, exposed in [9, 10], there are two kinds of gravitational fields, the ordinary gravitational field, due to the presence of masses, at rest, or in motion and other field called Heaviside field due to and acts only on moving masses. The Heaviside field is known in general relativity as Lense-Thirring effect or gravitomagnetism (The Heaviside field is the gravitational analogous of the magnetic field in the electromagnetic theory, its existence was proved employing the Gravity Probe B launched by NASA (See, for example, [11, 12]). It is a type of gravitational induction), interpreted as a distortion of space-time due to the motion of mass distributions, (see, for example [13, 14]). Here, we will present our second-order Jefimenko equations for gravitation and its solutions.

scholarly journals Relativity and the quantum theory

1928 ◽  
Vol 117 (778) ◽  
pp. 630-637 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
The Law

In Einstein’s theory of gravitation it is assumed that the geometry of space- time is characterised by the following equation for the measurement of displacement:— ds 2 = g mn dx m dx n { m n = 1, 2, 3, 4, the sign of summation being omitted for convenience. It is supposed that the coefficients, of which g mn is the type, are dependent upon the content of space, and the relation existing between them is the law of gravitation.

scholarly journals Astronomical tests of relativity: beyond parameterized post-Newtonian formalism (PPN), to testing fundamental principles

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S261) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladik Kreinovich
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Physics ◽  
Final Theory ◽  
Gravitational Theories ◽  
Cosmological Observations ◽  
Partial Analysis ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
Improved Accuracy ◽  
Fundamental Physical ◽  
Relativistic Gravitation

AbstractBy the early 1970s, the improved accuracy of astrometric and time measurements enabled researchers not only to experimentally compare relativistic gravity with the Newtonian predictions, but also to compare different relativistic gravitational theories (e.g., the Brans-Dicke Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation). For this comparison, Kip Thorne and others developed the Parameterized Post-Newtonian Formalism (PPN), and derived the dependence of different astronomically observable effects on the values of the corresponding parameters.Since then, all the observations have confirmed General Relativity. In other words, the question of which relativistic gravitation theory is in the best accordance with the experiments has been largely settled. This does not mean that General Relativity is the final theory of gravitation: it needs to be reconciled with quantum physics (into quantum gravity), it may also need to be reconciled with numerous surprising cosmological observations, etc. It is, therefore, reasonable to prepare an extended version of the PPN formalism, that will enable us to test possible quantum-related modifications of General Relativity.In particular, we need to include the possibility of violating fundamental principles that underlie the PPN formalism but that may be violated in quantum physics, such as scale-invariance, T-invariance, P-invariance, energy conservation, spatial isotropy violations, etc. In this paper, we present the first attempt to design the corresponding extended PPN formalism, with the (partial) analysis of the relation between the corresponding fundamental physical principles.

DESITTER GAUGE THEORY OF GRAVITATION

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. ZET ◽  
V. MANTA ◽  
S. BABETI
Keyword(s):  
Gauge Theory ◽  
Riemann Tensor ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Minkowski Space Time ◽  
Strength Tensor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
Tensor Formula

A deSitter gauge theory of gravitation over a spherical symmetric Minkowski space–time is developed. The "passive" point of view is adapted, i.e., the space–time coordinates are not affected by group transformations; only the fields change under the action of the symmetry group. A particular ansatz for the gauge fields is chosen and the components of the strength tensor are computed. An analytical solution of Schwarzschild–deSitter type is obtained in the case of null torsion. It is concluded that the deSitter group can be considered as a "passive" gauge symmetry for gravitation. Because of their complexity, all the calculations, inclusive of the integration of the field equations, are performed using an analytical program conceived in GRTensorII for MapleV. The program allows one to compute (without using a metric) the strength tensor [Formula: see text], Riemann tensor [Formula: see text], Ricci tensor [Formula: see text], curvature scalar [Formula: see text], field equations, and the integration of these equations.

Tensorial rank of gravitational theories in flat space-time

1983 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cavalleri ◽  
G. Spinelli
Keyword(s):  
Flat Space ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Gravitational Theories

A new theory of gravitation

1964 ◽  
Vol 282 (1389) ◽  
pp. 191-207 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Present Theory ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Einstein Theory ◽  
Tests Of General Relativity ◽  
Know How ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Usual Theory ◽  
Number Of Particles

A new theory of gravitation is developed. The theory is equivalent to that of Einstein in the description of macroscopic phenomena, and hence the situation is the same so far as the classical tests of general relativity are concerned. The new theory differs in its global implications, however. There are two main differences of principle. In the usual theory, the negative sign of the constant of proportionality –8 πG which appears in the field equations R ik – ½ g ik R = –8 πGT ik is chosen arbitrarily. In the present theory there is no such ambiguity; the sign must be minus. Further, the magnitude of G follows from a determination of the mean density of matter, thereby enabling the cosmologist to know how hard he will hit the ground if he is unfortunate enough to fall over a cliff. The second point of principle is that the equation R ik = 0 for an empty world in Einstein theory becomes meaningless; there is no such thing as an ‘empty’ world; in the present theory emptiness demands no world at all. Nor can there be a world containing a single particle, the least number of particles is two.

A comparison between Rosen and Einstein theory of gravitation

1983 ◽  
Vol 54 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 97-99
Author(s):  
G. Callegari ◽  
L. Baroni
Keyword(s):  
Einstein Theory ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation

Mathematical Models of Spacetime in Contemporary Physics and Essential Issues of the Ontology of Spacetime

1998 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Maciej Gos
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Time Arrow ◽  
Time Singularities ◽  
Time Quantum ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Definition Of

The general theory of relativity and field theory of matter generate an interesting ontology of space-time and, generally, of nature. It is a monistic, anti-atomistic and geometrized ontology — in which the substance is the metric field — to which all physical events are reducible. Such ontology refers to the Cartesian definition of corporeality and to Plato's ontology of nature presented in the Timaeus. This ontology provides a solution to the dispute between Clark and Leibniz on the issue of the ontological independence of space-time from distribution of events. However, mathematical models of space-time in physics do not solve the problem of the difference between time and space dimensions (invariance of equations with regard to the inversion of time arrow). Recent research on space-time singularities and asymmetrical in time quantum theory of gravitation will perhaps allow for the solution of this problem based on the structure of space-time and not merely on thermodynamics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document