scholarly journals Fatigue strength of long term postservice austenitic stainless steel and small fatigue crack growth at high temperature.

1989 ◽  
Vol 38 (435) ◽  
pp. 1402-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu OKAZAKI ◽  
Masamitsu HASHIMOTO ◽  
Toshio YADA
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Fatigue Strength ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Small Fatigue Crack

Effect of Hydrogenated Water on Fatigue Crack Growth for Austenitic Stainless Steel in Simulated BWR Water Environment

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li H. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Water Chemistry ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Growth Stage ◽  
Transgranular Fracture ◽  
Cyclic Loading Condition

Fatigue crack growth rates (FCGR) of sensitized austenitic stainless steel (SS) were measured in simulated BWR water at 288 °C using compact tension specimens under different cyclic loading modes, including saw-tooth, trapezoidal and constant loading pattern. This study tested sensitized SS in normal water chemistry (NWC) and hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) respectively, and attempted to clarify the effect of low electrochemical corrosion potential on the FCGR of sensitized stainless steel. Significant environment effects on FCGR of sensitized stainless steel were observed in both water chemistries when compared with air fatigue curve. The pronounced suppression effect of HWC on crack growth in statically sustained load was not observed in cyclic loading condition. ASME curve doesn’t seem to be conservative and could not bound all the FCGR data tested in this study. In contrast, all of the measured FCGR data were bound by the JSME disposition curve. PLEDGE model proposed by General Electric reasonably predicted the FCGR of sensitized SS in NWC, but underestimated the FCGR in HWC. ANL’s superposition model successfully estimated the FCGR measured in both water chemistries. The fractography exhibited transgranular fracture mode during the crack initiation and growth stage. No differences in the appearance of fracture surface were observed in HWC and NWC. Only in very high DO environments, the sensitized 304 SS exhibited the mixed mode of intergranular and transgranular during growth stage.

Fatigue Crack Growth Properties of a Cryogenic Structural Steel at Liquid Helium Temperature

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Konosu ◽  
Tomohiro Kishiro ◽  
Ogi Ivano ◽  
Yoshihiko Nunoya ◽  
Hideo Nakajima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Liquid Helium ◽  
Liquid Helium Temperature ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Helium Temperature ◽  
Growth Properties

The structural materials of the coils of superconducting magnets utilized in thermonuclear fusion reactors are used at liquid helium (4.2 K) temperatures and are subjected to repeated thermal stresses and electromagnetic forces. A high strength, high toughness austenitic stainless steel (12Cr-12Ni-10Mn-5Mo-0.2N) has recently been developed for large, thick-walled components used in such environments. This material is non-magnetic even when subjected to processing and, because it is a forging material, it is advantageous as a structural material for large components. In the current research, a large forging of 12Cr-12Ni-10Mn-5Mo-0.2N austenitic stainless steel, was fabricated to a thickness of 250 mm, which is typical of section thicknesses encountered in actual equipment. The tensile fatigue crack growth properties of the forging were examined at liquid helium temperature as function of specimen location across the thickness of the forging. There was virtually no evidence of variation in tensile strength or fatigue crack growth properties attributable to different sampling locations in the thickness direction and no effect of thickness due to the forging or solution treatment associated with large forgings was observed. It has been clarified that there are cases in which small scale yielding (SSY) conditions are not fulfilled when stress ratios are large. ΔJ was introduced in order to achieve unified expression inclusive of these regions and, by expressing crack growth rate accordingly, the following formula was obtained at the second stage (middle range). da/dN = CJ ΔJmJ, CJ = AJ/(ΔJ0)mJ, where, AJ = 1.47 × 10−5 mm/cycle, ΔJ0 = 2.42 × 103N/m.

Influence of texture on the short fatigue crack growth in austenitic stainless steel

2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mikulich ◽  
C. Blochwitz ◽  
W. Skrotzki ◽  
W. Tirschler
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Short Fatigue Crack
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document