scholarly journals Kiyoko Hagihara Ed., “Fundamental Theory for Environmental Decision Aiding”

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-408
Author(s):  
Akifusa FUJIOKA
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Theory ◽  
Decision Aiding ◽  
Environmental Decision

scholarly journals Rationalizing environmental decision-making through economic valuation?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Meinard
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Environmental Economic ◽  
Economic Valuation ◽  
Blind Spot ◽  
Value Judgment ◽  
Decision Aiding ◽  
Environmental Decision Making ◽  
Value Judgements ◽  
Environmental Inequalities ◽  
Environmental Decision

Environmental economic valuations of biodiversity are an increasingly active field of academic inquiry, often presented as a prominent means to rationalize decision-making on environmental issues. However, the meaning of this argument is unclear, because it uses the term “rationalize” in a loose way. This argument, as it is typically formulated in the literature, makes it look as though economic valuations do not involve any value-judgment by economists: by emphasizing rationalization, this argument silences value-judgements. This blind spot is critical, since environmental inequalities are pervasive in economic valuations and their applications, and environmental decision making hence unavoidably involves value-judgements. In this article, we identify conditions upon which environmental economic valuations can truly contribute to rationalizing decision making, despite environmental inequalities. We review the main arguments found in the literature to entrench the credentials of economic approaches to rationalize decision-making, and argue that these approaches fail, at a fundamental level. We then argue that the key for economic valuations to truly contribute to rationalization is that their usage should be embedded in the deployment of what we will call a justificatory task. We then take advantage of an analysis of the notion of rationality, when applied to decision-aiding processes, to translate this reasoning in the concrete terms of applications of environmental economic valuations. According to the argument that we articulate here, standard economic valuations, just like any other application of economic tools, can indeed play a role in rationalizing environmental decisions, in spite of the inequalities that they (re)produce. But this possibility is conditioned by the requirement that the economist implementing them should produce justifications.

Risk today, certainty tomorrow: The influence of construal level on environmental decision-making

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Sweeney ◽  
Amanda Hamilton ◽  
Ashley Beck ◽  
Brian Detweiler-Bedell ◽  
Jerusha Detweiler-Bedell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Construal Level ◽  
Environmental Decision Making ◽  
Environmental Decision

Impact and Potential of Decision Research on Decision Aiding

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Tolcott ◽  
Virginia E. Holt
Keyword(s):  
Decision Aiding ◽  
Decision Research

scholarly journals Multi-Criteria Framework for Selection of City-Wide Sanitation Solutions in Coastal Towns in Northern Angola

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5627
Author(s):  
Rita Ventura Matos ◽  
Filipa Ferreira ◽  
Liliana Alves ◽  
Elsa Ramos ◽  
Lucrécio Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Analysis ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Planning Stage ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Analysis ◽  
Sanitation Services ◽  
Decision Aiding ◽  
Coastal Cities ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Multi Stakeholder ◽  
Treatment Alternatives

In this paper, an expedited multi-criteria decision analysis framework, capable of tackling several dimensions for the choice of sanitation services, at an early planning stage is presented. The approach combines geographic information systems aided analysis for onsite solutions, with a multi-criteria decision analysis tool capable of suggesting and ranking several viable offsite treatment alternatives, according to the desired criteria. The framework was applied to four coastal cities in Northern Angola, one of the sub-Saharan countries of the west coast of Africa, thus obtaining an indication for city-wide solutions, as an aid to achieve the goal of ensuring full sanitation coverage in those four locations. It included possible onsite collection and storage interfaces, namely Ventilated Improved Pit latrines, fossa alterna, septic tanks or conventional sewer systems. The study also contributed to an informed decision regarding optimal offsite treatment facility type, namely based on dedicated or combined wastewater and faecal sludge treatment (co-treatment), as well as different options for locations and sanitation technologies. Alternatives were compared and ranked according to ten main criteria concerning social, economic, technological and environmental aspects. This work helped demonstrate the usefulness of decision-aiding tools in the multi-stakeholder and complex context of sanitation in a developing country.

scholarly journals K → μ+μ− as a clean probe of short-distance physics

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Avital Dery ◽  
Mitrajyoti Ghosh ◽  
Yuval Grossman ◽  
Stefan Schacht
Keyword(s):  
Matrix Element ◽  
Standard Model ◽  
Short Distance ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Final States ◽  
Interference Effects ◽  
Fundamental Theory ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Ckm Matrix ◽  
The Standard Model

Abstract The K → μ+μ− decay is often considered to be uninformative of fundamental theory parameters since the decay is polluted by long-distance hadronic effects. We demonstrate that, using very mild assumptions and utilizing time-dependent interference effects, ℬ(KS → μ+μ−)ℓ=0 can be experimentally determined without the need to separate the ℓ = 0 and ℓ = 1 final states. This quantity is very clean theoretically and can be used to test the Standard Model. In particular, it can be used to extract the CKM matrix element combination $$ \mid {V}_{ts}{V}_{td}\sin \left(\beta +{\beta}_s\right)\mid \approx \mid {A}^2{\lambda}^5\overline{\eta}\mid $$ ∣ V ts V td sin β + β s ∣ ≈ ∣ A 2 λ 5 η ¯ ∣ with hadronic uncertainties below 1%.

Evaluating alternative environmental decision support matrices for future Higg MSI scenarios

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Prado ◽  
Jesse Daystar ◽  
Michele Wallace ◽  
Steven Pires ◽  
Lise Laurin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Environmental Decision
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document