scholarly journals What actions can novice nurse practitioners take to develop and maintain therapeutic relationships with adult patients in primary care?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasenka Kushner
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Danika Koopmans

Metabolic syndrome consists of a combination of abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and elevated glucose levels. Metabolic syndrome is prevalent in North America with upwards of 20% of adults meeting criteria for the condition. It is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiovascular disease, stroke, and renal failure. Its prevalence and widespread consequences have major implications for overall burden of disease and cost on the health care system. First-line treatments for management of metabolic syndrome and its associated individual components require a multifaceted approach including nonpharmacological therapy. This integrative review seeks to answer the question: “What are effective non-pharmacological interventions nurse practitioners can implement for the management of metabolic syndrome in primary care settings for adult patients?” The Whittemore and Knafl (2005) method was followed to ensure a thorough process to which the findings and conclusion are described. There are few guidelines offering effective means of implementing non-pharmacological management of this disease. This review assesses the literature and identifies 13 articles which address effective non-pharmacological interventions in the management of MetS. These interventions were grouped into four categories including, dietary interventions, exercise interventions, psychological support, and a combined intervention approach. The lengths of intervention varied from 3 months to 5 years. Providers responsible for delivery of the interventions varied and were not limited to nurse practitioners. The outcomes of significance included improved anthropometric and serological measures, as well as improved participant motivation and behaviour change. For optimal outcomes of patients, the management of metabolic syndrome in a primary care setting requires a multifaceted and patient-centred approach.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.


Author(s):  
Cilgy M. Abraham ◽  
Katherine Zheng ◽  
Allison A. Norful ◽  
Affan Ghaffari ◽  
Jianfang Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 696-709
Author(s):  
Calum F Leask ◽  
Heather Tennant

Background Considering new models of delivery may help reduce increasing pressures on primary care. One potentially viable solution is utilising Advanced Practitioners to deliver unscheduled afternoon visits otherwise undertaken by a General Practitioner (GP). Aims Evaluate the feasibility of utilising an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) to deliver unscheduled home visits on behalf of GPs in a primary care setting. Methods Following a telephone request from patients, ANPs conducted unscheduled home visits on behalf of GPs over a six-month period. Service-level data collected included patient-facing time and outcome of visits. Practice staff and ANPs participated in mind-mapping sessions to explore perceptions of the service. Results There were 239 accepted referrals (total visiting time 106.55 hours). The most common outcomes for visits were ‘medication and worsening statement given’ (107 cases) and ‘self-care advice’ (47 cases). GPs were very satisfied with the service (average score 90%), reporting reductions in stress and capacity improvements. Given the low referral rejection rate, ANPs discussed the potential to increase the number of practices able to access this model, in addition to the possibility of utilising other practitioners (such as paramedics or physiotherapists) to deliver the same service. Conclusions It appears delivering unscheduled care provision using an ANP is feasible and acceptable to GPs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 332???339 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHARON A. BROWN ◽  
DEANNA E. GRIMES

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Clark ◽  
Kathleen A. Kent ◽  
Richard D. Jackson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document