scholarly journals Blended Learning From Design to Evaluation: International Case Studies of Evidence-Based Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prof. Norman D. Vaughan ◽  
Aline Reali ◽  
Stefan Stenbom ◽  
Marieta Jansen Van Vuuren ◽  
David MacDonald
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
International Faculty ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Institutional Stakeholders

This study compares and contrasts four international faculty development programs for blended learning in order to understand the benefits, challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations from such initiatives. The benefits identified for faculty members, who participated in these programs, were that they became more reflective of their teaching practice and began to make a role adjustment from being a content provider to a designer and facilitator of learning for students. The biggest challenge appeared to be a lack of common institutional definition and understanding of blended learning as well as a lack of time and resources to support faculty in the redesign of their courses. With regards to lessons learned, each program emphasized the need for all institutional stakeholders to be involved in supporting the initiative and that blended learning does not simply imply adding digital technologies to an existing face-to-face course. The key recommendation from this study is that a faculty development program for blended learning needs to be clearly aligned with the institution’s vision and mission.

scholarly journals Strategic Approaches to SoEL Inquiry Within and Across Disciplines: Twenty-year Impact of an International Faculty Development Program in Diverse University Contexts

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. p1
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Webb ◽  
Harry T. Hubball ◽  
Anthony Clarke ◽  
Simon Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Professional Learning ◽  
Educational Leaders ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Graduate Degree ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
International Faculty ◽  
University Campuses

Educational leaders on university campuses around the world are increasingly required to account for the effectiveness, efficiency and quality of their undergraduate and graduate degree programs. The S Scholarship of Educational Leadership (SoEL) in higher education is a distinctive form of strategic inquiry for educational leaders with an explicit transformational agenda of educational practices within and across the disciplines in diverse university contexts. This paper examines complex institutional challenges and strategic approaches to SoEL inquiry. In an international faculty development context, data suggests that educational leaders from a variety of disciplines face significant challenges when undertaking SoEL inquiry. Strategic institutional supports and customised professional development are key to facilitating SoEL inquiry in higher education. Further, SoEL is inherently situated, socially mediated, and responsive to the professional learning needs and circumstances of educational leaders within and across the disciplines in diverse university contexts.

Making the Move to Blended Learning: Reflections on a Faculty Development Program

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole R Myers ◽  
Sandra J Mixer ◽  
Tami H Wyatt ◽  
Trena M. Paulus ◽  
Debra S Lee
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Situational Leadership ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Common Purpose ◽  
Teaching Thinking

Lessons learned from a faculty development program that preceded the move of a traditional PhD program in nursing to a blended learning model using online and face-to-face strategies are discussed. The majority of lessons and strategies presented are universal to any faculty development program. The lessons are organized into seven topics: Situational Leadership, Adult Learners, Just in Time Teaching, Thinking About Learning and Teaching, Lifelong Learning, Transparency and Collaboration, and Community. Our far-reaching lessons are related to the contextual nature of leadership, how to effectively design and time learning experiences for adults, the importance of open and supportive communities working for a common purpose, and how each person’s perspective shapes his or her learning experience and how the lessons learned are applied.

47. Evaluation of new implementation strategies, program effectiveness and dissemination of new pedagogical knowledge: Centre for faculty development's stepping stones teaching certificate program

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
D. Richardson ◽  
I. Silver ◽  
A. Dionne
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Program Effectiveness ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Journal Club ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Stepping Stones ◽  
Certificate Program ◽  
The Impact

This evaluation of the integrated Stepping Stones (SS) Teaching Certificate program, including its instructional development (workshops) and theory review (journal club) components, will inform further program development. Results of this project will also add to the limited amount of scholarly work in the area of faculty development program evaluation. Faculty development literature in the area of organized program assessment reveals use of either quantitative OR qualitative methods. In this project, a novel method combining both techniques was used to explore program impact. Participants completed 2 questionnaires to identify skill-set knowledge gaps in teaching effectiveness. Pre- and post-program quantitative gaps were generated. Focus groups were used for qualitative exploration. Areas explored pre-program included: a) motives for enrollment, b) program expectations and c) prior teaching preparation. Post-program discussion explored: the impact of the program on a) participant’s perceived gaps, b) teaching behaviour change, and c) its influence on their career in education. We believed the program’s interprofessional environment would foster development of a learning community having impact on faculty knowledge, skills and attitudes related to teaching, and potentially elicit behavioural change in teaching practices. Results from a 2004-2005 cohort of participants have identified a variety of benefits for faculty and their teaching practice. Results from a second separate cohort, 2005-2006 participants, validated the initial findings. Remarkable harmonization in the results of the qualitative analysis between the two cohort samples was evident. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in each of the domains examined qualitatively. Both qualitative and quantitatively, program effectiveness was demonstrated immediately following completion of the program. Follow up to assess the sustainability of the effects is ongoing. The analysis of the quantitative discrepancy (gaps) data has lead to a possible technique to assist in identifying unperceived educational needs. McLeod PJ, Steinert Y, Nasmith L, Conochie L. Faculty Development in Canadian medical schools: a 10-year update. CMAJ 1997; 156(10):1419-23. Hewson MG, Copeland HL, Fishleder AJ. What’s the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2001; 13(3):153-60. Moore EM. A Framework for Outcomes Evaluation in the Continuing Development of Physicians, in: The Continuing Professional Development of Physicians. Eds. Davis D, Barnes BE, Fox R. AMA Press, 2003.

scholarly journals The impact of an international faculty development program on simulation-based healthcare education

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 510-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Soo Chung ◽  
S. Barry Issenberg ◽  
Paul Phrampus ◽  
Geoff Miller ◽  
Sang Mo Je ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Healthcare Education ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
International Faculty ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals How to Launch and Continually Enhance an Effective Medical Campus Faculty Development Program: Steps for Implementation and Lessons Learned

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 147-156
Author(s):  
Ellen Childs ◽  
Christy D Remein ◽  
Robina M Bhasin ◽  
Angelique C Harris ◽  
Alyssa Day ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Faculty Development Program

scholarly journals e-Tutor: A Multilingual Open Educational Resource for Faculty Development to Teach Online

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Rapp ◽  
Yasemin Gülbahar ◽  
Müge Adnan
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Online Teaching ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Open Educational Resource ◽  
Educational Resource ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Technological Infrastructure ◽  
Higher Education System ◽  
Face To Face

<p class="2">The situation in Ukraine poses severe problems to the higher education system and to students in Eastern Ukraine. Many students and academicians had been compelled to leave their university buildings and move westwards. Hence, they are forced to substitute face-to-face teaching with distance learning, often on a large scale, but within a short span of time and with limited resources. While technical/technological infrastructure often exists, know-how about conducting online teaching and respective faculty development is often found to be lacking. Within the framework of a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), a faculty development program developed in Turkey as an Open Educational Resource (e-Tutor) was adopted in three languages (English, Ukrainian, and Russian) to support qualifying university staff in teaching online. e-Tutor comprises of 14 modules, each with various content, covering different aspects of online teaching. In the following note, we briefly present the program along with the context, target group/aims, concept, genesis, initial experiences, and further development.</p>

scholarly journals Flipped learning in faculty development programs: opportunities for greater faculty engagement, self-learning, collaboration and discussion

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Yılmaz ◽  
Süleyman Ayhan Çalışkan ◽  
Şükran Darcan ◽  
Feyza Darendeliler
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Flipped Learning ◽  
Pediatric Endocrinology ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Self Learning

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the impact of flipped learning in faculty development program (FDP) dedicated for developing key-feature questions (KFQs), and to compare examinees’ success and their opinions for the KFQs in a board exam. Methods The study group consisted of two cohorts – Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society Board members (n=11) and Pediatric Endocrinology Subspecialty 2019 Board Examination examinees (n=22). We used flipped learning approach to develop KFQs. This entailed writing KFQs while learning took place online. The discussion and refinement of the questions for the exam were done during the face-to-face meeting. At the end, feedback was taken from both cohorts. Results The faculty members developed 14 KFQs during the flipped learning process. They found the training useful (Md=9, IQR=1), and expressed high satisfaction (Md=9, IQR=1) for flipped learning approach. According to the faculty members, peer review was an important step in the flipped learning instructions for revising and improving the KFQs. Conclusions A successful intervention of flipped learning approach has been tested in a FDP dedicated for KFQ writing. During flipped learning, the board (faculty) members were more engaged, motivated for self-learning and collaboration, and encouraged for robust face-to-face discussions.

Influence of Reduced Seat Time on Satisfaction and Perception of Course Development Goals: A Case Study in Faculty Development

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee DeNoyelles ◽  
Clara Cobb ◽  
Denise Lowe
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Course Development ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Learning Principles ◽  
Seat Time

This paper describes the redesign of a faculty development program at a large public university that transitioned from weekly face-to-face meetings to a version that reduced seat time by half. Focus is on course development activities in which individual faculty began designing and developing their online courses. Survey data was collected and analyzed from two “pre-revision” and two “post-revision” versions of the faculty development program to assess the satisfaction with the course and perceptions about faculty course development progress. Results indicate that faculty expressed a higher overall satisfaction with the “post-revision” program and expressed stronger perceptions about their ability to develop their online courses. This is attributed to three reasons; first, there was a balance of autonomy and support; second, an emphasis on adult learning principles to support content creation; and third, a shift from individual to community. Implications for practice are shared and recommendations for future research are proposed in the conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document