scholarly journals The Influence of Problem Based Learning Model and Learning Motivation to Expository Writing Text Ability of Students Grade VII MTsN 1 Bukittinggi

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yendrawaty Yendrawaty

This research aimed to describe the influence of Problem Based Learning Model and Learning Motivation to Expository Text Writing Skills of Students Grade VII MTsN Bukittinggi. The type of research is quasi experiment and the design used is factorial design 2x2. Sampling is done by purposive sampling. Data analysis and discussion were conducted through descriptive-analysis. The analysis results of data were as follows. First, writing expository text taught using the Problem Based Learning model is better than students taught by conventional learning models. Second, Second, writing the expositional text of students who have high learning motivation taught by using Problem Based Learning model is better than those taught with conventional learning model. Third, writing the expositional text of students who have low learning motivation taught by using Problem Based Learning model is better than those taught with conventional learning model. Fourthly, there is no interaction between learning motivation and the learning model in influencing the ability to write expository text of students. In the next description, PBL is used for Problem Based Learning.

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa' Nur Latifah

<p class="Abstract"><em>Th</em><em>e </em><em>goals </em><em>of this research </em><em>to find out: (1) </em><em>the </em><em>different of narrative writing skills between students </em><em>that teached</em><em> using Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model; (2) differences in narrative writing skills between students who hashigh learning motivation and low learning motivation; (3) the interaction between learning models and learning motivation trough narrative writing skills. This research is quantitative experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The technique</em><em> to got sample</em><em> us</em><em>ing </em><em>cluster random sampling</em><em>.</em><em> Two</em><em> W</em><em>ay</em><em>sAnava </em><em>was used </em><em>to</em><em> analys</em><em> the</em><em> data with a significance level of 0.05.The results of th</em><em>isresearch were</em><em> (1) there</em><em> was a</em><em> differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between students who </em><em>teached by</em><em> Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model with F<sub>A</sub> = 6.259; (2) there </em><em>was a </em><em>differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between </em><em>the</em><em> high learning motivation and low learning motivation with F<sub>B</sub> = 35,688; (3) there is no interaction between the learning model and learning motivation towards narrative writing skills as indicated by F<sub>AB</sub> = 0.628.</em><em></em></p><p class="Abstract"><em> </em></p><strong>            <em>Keyword:</em></strong><em> think talk write, example non example, narrative writing skills, elementary school</em>


GERAM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Fenny Anita

This research was conducted to explain the effect of the learning model CIRC and reading interest on the results of the descriptive essay writing skills of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. This type of research is a quantitative study using a quasi-experimental method and a 2x2 factorial experimental design. The population of this study was students of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Sampling was done by purposive sampling with a sample size of 60 students. Data collection was carried out using two instruments, namely questionnaires and performance tests. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that four things are as follows. First, the skills of writing essays of descriptions of students taught using the learning model CIRC are better than those taught by conventional learning models of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Second, the writing skills of students who have high reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have high reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Third, the writing skills of students who have low reading interest who are taught using the learning model CIRC are higher than students who have low reading interest who are taught using the conventional learning model of class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang. Fourth, there is no interaction between reading interest and learning models in influencing the writing skills of descriptive essays of class X SMA Negeri 1 Bangkinang.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Riti Desmiwati ◽  
Ratnawulan Ratnawulan ◽  
Yulkifli Yulkifli

One effort that can be done by teachers to improve the competence of students was to develop of Student Worksheet (LKPD). LKPD was said to be qualified if it has valid criteria. Valid means the developed product can be used to measure what should be measured. Validity of LKPD was assessed by experts in the field. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of LKPD experimentphysics oriented by problem based learning models be used tools practicum based on digital technology. The methode of this study was descrptive methode. The research instrument used was validation sheet in the form of assessment questionnaire. Analysis of data used descriptive analysis. The validation result was obtained LKPD physics experiment oriented Problem Based Learning model with tools of practicum based on digital technology was valid criteria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rois Mahfud Setiawan ◽  
Senja Putri Merona

This study aimed to determine whether the problem based learning models was better than conventional learning models in terms of critical thinking and mathematics conceptual understanding. Based on observations at MTs-N Sampung Ponorogo, it was obtained that students’ mathematics conceptual understanding and critical thinking were quite low. This research was a quasi-experimental with the population students of class VII MTs-N Sampung Ponorogo. The sample was class VII A given a conventional learning model and class VII B given a problem-based learning model. Reasearch data was collected by using test. Pretest and postest was used to get preliminary and final data. Pretest data was analyzed by using t-test while posttest data was analyzed by using the Mann Withney U test. The results of this study were the students’ ability on critical thinking and matematical conceptual understanding used problem based learning models was better than students’ used conventional learning models


Author(s):  
Martanti Dwi Kristyanawati ◽  
Sarwaji Surwandi ◽  
Muhammad Rohmadi

This study aims is to improve: (1) student learning motivation; and (2) students' writing skills in writing exposition texts of class VIII on State of Junior High School 3 Surakarta through the application of the Problem Based Learning model. This type of research is Class Action Research (CAR). This research was conducted in three cycles. This research was conducted in State of Junior High School 3 Surakarta in the first semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. This research was conducted in five months, starting from July to November 2018. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII- 9 in the first semester of the 2018/2019 academic year with a total of 32 students. The method of data collection is done by using tests, observations, questionnaires and document techniques. Data analysis techniques are carried out using critical analysis. Based on the analysis, the study concluded that: (1) the application of the Problem Based Learning model was able to increase students' motivation in learning Indonesian. This is indicated by an increase in the average score of learning motivation and the number of students with a learning motivation score of classification A (Very Good) and B (Good) in each cycle performed; and (2) the application of the Problem Based Learning model is able to improve students' writing skills in writing exposition texts of class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Surakarta in the first semester of the academic year 2018/2019. This is indicated by an increase in the average student score and the level of student mastery throughout the cycle. The average score of students' writing skills in exposition text writing, increased from 63.09 in the initial conditions, increased to 73.00 at the end of the first cycle, increased to 76.78 at the end of the second cycle, and then increased to 80.22 at the end from Cycle III. The level of mastery of student learning increased from 12.50% in the initial conditions, increasing to 43.75% at the end of the first cycle, increasing to 68.75% at the end of the second cycle, then increasing to 100.00% at the end of cycle III.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Diana Kartika ◽  
Yetty Morelent

The objectives of this research are (1) to find out whether the CIRC and TTW learning models significantly influence the students’ ability to write reports at Muhammadiyah Junior High School Padang, (2) to explore whether the CIRC and TTW learning models have a significant influence on the highly motivated students’ ability to write reports, (3) to analyze whether the CIRC and TTW learning models have a significant influence on the ability to write reports of the students with low motivation (4) to identify whether there is influence on the interaction between the use of CIRC type learning model and TTW and learning motivation toward their ability to write the report. This study was conducted within randomized control-group pretest-posttest experimental designs whose participants were Grade 8 students of Muhammadiyah Junior High School Padang. The instruments of data collection were report writing tests, questionnaires and interviews. The findings show that there is a significant influence of the use of CIRC and TTW type learning model with the students’ motivation to learn the skills of writing reports. Secondly, there is a significant influence on the use of CIRC and TTW learning models on the highly motivated students’ report writing skills. Thirdly, there is a significant influence on the use of CIRC and TTW learning models on the lowly motivated students’ report writing skills. Finally, there is the interaction of the use of learning models of CIR and TTE types with their learning motivation on their report writing skills.


Author(s):  
Andi Kaharuddin

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning models towards the mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. This study is quantitative experimental research. The population in this were all 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. The technique of determining the sample was done by cluster random sampling. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics and inferential statistics where the hypothesis test used is the t-test. The results showed the effect of problem-based learning models better than direct instruction and problem-based learning model positive effect on mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-75
Author(s):  
Ribka Kariani Br Sembiring

Abstract. This study aims to find out what cooperative learning method is most effective in improving students’ activity and motivation in Statistics subject. This research is a Classroom Action Research (PTK). The subjects of this study are the 5th semester students of PGSD Study Program with total number 35 students. Instruments used consist of: (1) Observation sheet of learning implementation; (2) Observation sheet of students’ activity in learning with assessment on students’ oral activities, visual activities, listening activities, writing activities and emotional activities; (3) Observation sheets of group effectiveness with assessment on the efficiency aspects of problem solving and member participation; (4) Questionnaire of motivation to find out to which extent the learning can improve student's motivation which is seen from the students perception of their satisfaction in learning. The research results show that when PBM learning model is used in cycle 1 and Jigsaw learning model is used in cycle 2, Jigsaw is better than PBM learning model.Keywords: Problem-based learning model, Jigsaw Learning Model, activity and learning motivation.


Author(s):  
Astuty Sriwahyuni Tarigan ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Efendi Napitupulu

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial dan model pembelajaran drill and practice. (2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi dan motivasi belajar rendah. (3) Mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar KKPI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Hasil analisis data diperoleh; (1) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan media pembelajaran drill and practice lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 114,59 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). (2) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar rendah. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 167,04 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1.56), dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar KKPI. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 16,82 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar KKPI, model pembelajaran drill and practice tepat digunakan bagi siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi. Siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar rendah lebih efektif dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran, Motivasi Belajar, Hasil Belajar KKPI  Abstract: This study aims to: (1) Know the differences in KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with tutorial learning models and drill and practice learning models. (2) Knowing the differences in learning outcomes of KKPI students with high learning motivation and low learning motivation. (3) Determine the interaction between the learning model and student learning motivation towards KKPI learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The results of data analysis are obtained; (1) KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with drill and practice learning media are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students who are taught with tutorial learning models. This is indicated by Fcount = 114.59 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). (2) KKPI learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students with low learning motivation. This is indicated by Fcount = 167.04 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56), and (3) there is an interaction between learning models and student motivation in influencing KKPI learning outcomes. This is indicated by Fcount = 16.82 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). The results showed that to improve KKPI learning outcomes, the drill and practice learning model is appropriate for students who have high learning motivation. Students who have low learning motivation are more effectively taught with a tutorial learning model. Keywords: Learning Model, Learning Motivation, KKPI Learning Outcomes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document