National Association of Medical Examiners Position Paper: Medical Examiner Release of Organs and Tissues for Transplantation

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Keith Pinckard ◽  
Roberta J. Geiselhart ◽  
Ellen Moffatt ◽  
Gregory A. Schmunk ◽  
Daniel L. Schultz ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Melinek ◽  
Lindsey C. Thomas ◽  
William R. Oliver ◽  
Gregory A. Schmunk ◽  
Victor W. Weedn ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1193-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Weinberg ◽  
Victor W. Weedn ◽  
Seth Weinberg ◽  
David Fowler

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-618
Author(s):  
Roger A. Mitchell ◽  
Francisco Diaz ◽  
Gary A. Goldfogel ◽  
Mark Fajardo ◽  
Stephany E. Fiore ◽  
...  

The National Association of Medical Examiners commissioned an ad hoc committee to provide recommendations for the investigation, examination, and reporting of deaths in custody. Deaths in custody, whether occuring in jail/prison or during an altercation with law enforcement, is a complex issue and requires the forensic pathologist to be knowledgable and deliberative about his/her diagnosis. This paper provides recommendations for the forensic pathologist as it relates to 1) categorization of deaths in custody, 2) critical information required during investigation, 3) enhanced autopsy procedures, 4) guidance on death certification, 5) parameters for statistical reporting, and 6) release of information to the public. A uniform approach by medical examiners and coroners to the investigation and evaluation of deaths in custody is critical. The establishment of recommendations has the potential to ensure consistency and reliability to the definition, investigation, and certification of these cases. Such uniformity and consistency will instill confidence in the independence of the medical examiner/forensic pathologist/coroner by the criminal justice system, public health system, and community at large.


2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyd G. Stephens ◽  
Jeffrey M. Jentzen ◽  
Steven Karch ◽  
Charles V. Wetli ◽  
Deborah C. Mash

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Middleton ◽  
Samantha Baxter ◽  
Erin Demo ◽  
Christina Honeywell ◽  
Jeff Jentzen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 192536212110324
Author(s):  
Victor W. Weedn

The common practice of retaining organs and tissues after the autopsy dissection is a potential legal liability for forensic pathologists and the offices they work for. In 1988, a coroner and the coroner’s office were successfully sued for corneal procurements without the consent of the next of kin. That led to later lawsuits of forensic pathologists and medical examiner offices over the retention of brains for formalin fixation and neuropathologic examination without consent, although the autopsies were not consent based. National Association of Medical Examiners became involved in this ligation and filed numerous amicus briefs. These later lawsuits were not successful. After caselaw on the subject, such lawsuits have largely abated. Nonetheless, the threat of such lawsuits remains, and statutory language can be promulgated to mitigate the risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document