Effects of welding speed and edge distance on solidification cracking length during laser welding at the narrow flange edge of austenitic stainless steel

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Kikuchi ◽  
Takahiro Osuki ◽  
Manabu Fukumoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Ogawa
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding ◽  
Welding Speed ◽  
Solidification Cracking ◽  
Edge Distance

scholarly journals A New Test Method for Evaluation of Solidification Cracking Susceptibility of Stainless Steel during Laser Welding

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbin Wang ◽  
Li Xiong ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Qin Ma ◽  
Yan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding ◽  
Cooling Rate ◽  
Weld Joint ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Welding Speed ◽  
Hot Cracking ◽  
Weld Bead ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Solidification Cracking

A new test method named “Trapezoidal hot” cracking test was developed to evaluate solidification cracking susceptibility of stainless steel during laser welding. The new test method was used to obtain the solidification cracking directly, and the solidification cracking susceptibility could be evaluated by the solidification cracking rate, defined as the ratio of the solidification cracking length to the weld bead length under certain conditions. The results show that with the increase in the solidification cracking rate, the solidification cracking susceptibility of SUS310 stainless steel was much higher than that of SUS316 and SUS304 stainless steels during laser welding (at a welding speed of 1.0 m/min) because a fully austenite structure appeared in the weld joint of the former steel, while the others were ferrite and austenitic mixed structures during solidification. Besides, with an increase in welding speed from 1.0 to 2.0 m/min during laser welding, the solidification cracking susceptibility of SUS310 stainless steel decreased slightly; however, there was a tendency towards an increase in the solidification cracking susceptibility of SUS304 stainless steel due to the decrease in the amount of ferrite under a higher cooling rate.

Experimental Investigations of Nd:YAG Laser Welding of 630 and 321 Stainless Steel and their Effects on Process Parameters

2009 ◽  
Vol 83-86 ◽  
pp. 384-391
Author(s):  
Seyed Ali Asghar Akbari Mousavi ◽  
A.R. Sufizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding ◽  
Welding Speed ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Welding Parameters ◽  
Beam Diameter ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Pulse Welding

In this paper, the laser welding of the 630 precipitation hardening stainless steel with the 321 austenitic stainless steel was considered. The experiments were carried out with the pulsed Nd: YAG laser under various welding parameters. The effects of power of laser, voltage, duration of pulse, welding speed, beam diameter and frequency, on the weld volume are investigated. The results show that the weld volume increases with voltage and frequency. The weld volume decreases with welding speed and beam diameter. Moreover, the study shows two effects for the duration of pulse. Up to some value of duration of pulse, the weld volume increases. Exceeding, this limit reduces the weld volume. The optical and scanning electron microscopic tests were carried out. The results show that the martensitic structure is produced in the 630 stainless steel side and the austenitic stainless steel is produced in the 321 stainless steel side. The microhardness tests across the samples were carried out. The results show the maximum hardness is for the 630 stainless steel side and the minimum weld hardness is for the 321 stainless steel side. The high voltage may cause hot cracks in the 321 stainless steel side. The effects of gas flow rate on the microstructure were also considered.

A Study on Laser Welding of Titanium and Stainless Steel

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angshuman Chattopadhyay ◽  
Gopinath Muvvala ◽  
Vikranth Racherla ◽  
Ashish Kumar Nath
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding ◽  
Weld Joint ◽  
Welding Speed ◽  
Fusion Process ◽  
Longitudinal Stress ◽  
Transverse Cracks ◽  
Cooling Rates ◽  
Melt Pool ◽  
Longitudinal Cracks

Joining of dissimilar metals and alloys has been envisioned since a long time with specific high end applications in various fields. One such combination is austenitic stainless steel grade SS304 and commercial grade titanium, which is very difficult to join under conventional fusion process due to extensive cracking and failure caused by mismatch in structural and thermal properties as well as formation of the extremely brittle and hard intermetallic compounds. One of the methods proposed in literature to control the formation of intermetallics is by fast cooling fusion process like laser beam welding. The present study has been done on laser welding of titanium and stainless steel AISI 304 to understand the interaction of these materials during laser welding at different laser power and welding speed which could yield different cooling rates. Two types of cracks were observed in the weld joint, namely longitudinal cracks and transverse cracks with respect to the weld direction. Longitudinal cracks could be completely eliminated at faster welding speeds, but transverse cracks were found little influenced by the welding speed. The thermal history, i.e. melt pool lifetime and cooling rate of the molten pool during laser welding was monitored and a relation between thermo-cycle with occurrence of cracks was established. It is inferred that the longitudinal cracks are mainly due to the formation of various brittle intermetallic phases of Fe and Ti, which could be minimized by providing relatively less melt pool lifetime at high welding speeds. The reason of the transverse cracks could be the generation of longitudinal stress in weld joint due to the large difference in the thermal expansion coefficient of steel and titanium. In order to mitigate the longitudinal stress laser welding was carried out with a novel experimental arrangement which ensured different cooling rates of these two metals during laser welding. With this the tendency of transverse cracks also could be minimized significantly.

Yb:YAG Disc Laser Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel Without Filler Material

2009 ◽  
Vol 410-411 ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markku Keskitalo ◽  
Kari Mäntyjärvi
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Tensile Tests ◽  
Solidification Cracking ◽  
Filler Material ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Butt Weld

The laser weldability of austenitic stainless steel (ASS) is good because of the material’s high absorptivity and favourable microstructure. There can be a slight possibility of solidification cracking at high welding speeds and low Crekv/Niekv ratios. Test welds were welded with a Yb:YAG disc laser. The test material was 3.2 mm EN 1.4404 2H C700 type stainless steel plate which was work hardened by cold rolling. The test materials were welded with different heat inputs ranging from 0.024 kJ/mm to 0.12 kJ/mm and with 300 mm and 200 mm focal lengths. The weld seams were square-groove welded as butt weld without filler material. The edges of the groove were made by mechanical or laser cutting. The hardness profiles from cross-sections of the welds were measured with a Vickers microhardness tester using 200 g weight. The mechanical properties were tested with tensile tests. The welds were classified with radiographic verification by an accredited laboratory. A number of the welds were fatigue tested with a bending fatigue tester. The mechanical properties (Rp 0.2%, Rm) of the laser welds were almost the same as in the base material except at the highest heat input. In the radiographic classification, the welds which were welded to the laser-cut edge were classified as class B (accepted). The other welds were classified as class D or C (rejected). The main reasons for the rejection of welds made on mechanically cut edges were lack of penetration or undercut of the weld. A problem with mechanically cut edges, and hence the welds, is that they can be non-square and bent edge. Fatigue tests and tensile tests gave no evidence of solidification cracking in the microstructure of the solidified parts of the welds.

Numerical Analysis of Solidification Behavior during Laser Welding Nickel-Based Single-Crystal Superalloy Part: II Crystallography-Dependent Supersaturation of Liquid Aluminum

2021 ◽  
Vol 1018 ◽  
pp. 13-22
Author(s):  
Zhi Guo Gao
Keyword(s):  
Laser Welding ◽  
Single Crystal ◽  
Weld Pool ◽  
Welding Speed ◽  
Heat Input ◽  
Laser Power ◽  
Liquid Aluminum ◽  
Dendrite Growth ◽  
Solidification Cracking ◽  
Solid Liquid Interface

The thermal metallurgical modeling of liquid aluminum supersaturation was further developed through couple of heat transfer model, dendrite selection model, multicomponent dendrite growth model and nonequilibrium solidification model during three-dimensional nickel-based single-crystal superalloy weld pool solidification. The welding configuration plays more important role in supersaturation of liquid aluminum, morphology instability and nonequilibrium partition behavior. The bimodal distribution of liquid aluminum supersaturation along the solid/liquid interface is crystallographically symmetrical about the weld pool centerline in (001) and [100] welding configuration. The distribution of liquid aluminum supersaturation along the solid/liquid interface is crystallographically asymmetrical throughout the weld pool in (001) and [110] welding configuration. Optimum low heat input (low laser power and high welding speed) with (001) and [100] welding configuration is more favored to predominantly promote epitaxial [001] dendrite growth to reduce the metallurgical factors for solidification cracking than that of high heat input (high laser power and slow welding speed) with (001) and [110] welding configuration. The lower the heat input is used, the lower supersaturation of liquid aluminum is imposed, and the smaller size of vulnerable [100] dendrite growth region is incurred to ameliorate solidification cracking susceptibility and vice versa. The overall supersaturation of liquid aluminum in (001) and [100] welding configuration is beneficially smaller than that of (001) and [110] welding configuration regardless of heat input, and is not thermodynamically relieved by gamma prime γˊ phase. (001) and [110] welding configuration is detrimental to weldability and deteriorates the solidification cracking susceptibility because of unfavorable crystallographic orientations and alloying aluminum enrichment. The mechanism of asymmetrical solidification cracking because of crystallography-dependent supersaturation of liquid aluminum is proposed. The eligible solidification cracking location is particularly confined in [100] dendrite growth region. Moreover, the theoretical predictions agree well with the experiment results. The useful modeling is also applicable to other single-crystal superalloys with similar metallurgical properties for laser welding or laser cladding. The thorough numerical analyses facilitate the understanding of weld pool solidification behavior, microstructure development and solidification cracking phenomena in the primary γ phase, and thereby optimize the welding conditions (laser power, welding speed and welding configuration) for successful crack-free laser welding.

Influence of Side Assist Gas on Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Welds of Austenitic Stainless Steel in Laser Welding

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 0502005
Author(s):  
周媛 Zhou Yuan ◽  
蔡艳 Cai Yan ◽  
衡昊坤 Heng Haokun ◽  
盛洁 Sheng Jie ◽  
李芳 Li Fang
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Corrosion Resistance ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding

Deep penetration laser welding of austenitic stainless steel thick-plates using a 20 kW fiber laser

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 012009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Fang ◽  
Jijun Xin ◽  
Wenhua Dai ◽  
Jing Wei ◽  
Jiefeng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Welding ◽  
Fiber Laser ◽  
Deep Penetration ◽  
Thick Plates
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document