Repair or Observation of Resin Margin Defects: Clinical Trial After Five Years

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-364
Author(s):  
JB Dennison ◽  
P Yaman ◽  
DJ Fasbinder ◽  
AA Herrero

SUMMARY Objective: To assess the effectiveness of repair/resealing of stained composite margins as an alternative to controlled observation without treatment in a randomized clinical trial after five years. Methods and Materials: Each patient recruited had from one to three composite restorations with visible margin discoloration. Initially, the characteristics of each defect were recorded with direct vision through a surgical microscope at 20× magnification. Clinical evaluation was done by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria for color, margin discoloration, and margin adaptation. Each restoration was then randomly assigned to a control or treatment group. Control restorations were observed yearly for the presence of recurrent caries; treatment restorations were resealed by exposing the margin with a ¼ round bur, removing all interfacial stain, acid etching, placing an adhesive bonding agent, and a flowable composite to restore margin integrity. There were 152 patients recruited, with 360 restorations (180 control and 180 treatment). Results: At five years, 104 patients were recalled (68%) with 271 restorations (76%): 136 untreated control and 135 resealed restorations. At that time, 61 restorations had been lost or replaced for nonrelated reasons. Clinical evaluation of the remaining 210 restorations determined penetrating discoloration (control = 81%, resealed = 46%) and margin crevice formation (control = 21%, resealed = 11%). Recurrent caries was diagnosed cumulatively in only six control and five treatment restorations (<5%). Microscopically, 49 control restorations (49%) and 36 resealed restorations (33%) had crevice formation. Discoloration was distributed as follows: 9% vs 47% with no discoloration, 30% vs 33% in the composite, 49% vs 18% in the interface, and 12% vs 2% in tooth structure. Conclusions: Resealing of restorations with margin discoloration reduced the occurrence of penetrating stain from 81% in controls to 46% in resealed margins and crevicing from 21% to 11% after five years. Both controlled observation and resealing of margins resulted in a similar very low incidence (<6%) of recurrent caries.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia Assis Carvalho ◽  
Murillo Martins Leite ◽  
Jessica Karla Maia Zago ◽  
Carla Aparecida Bernardes Costa Men Nunes ◽  
Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Barata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multimode adhesives incorporate the versatility of adapting to various clinical situations by its capacity to be used in different protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical behavior of composite resin direct restorations (Class I and II) performed with different universal dentin adhesive application protocols comparing adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria. Methods The current study is a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, and convenience sample controlled clinical trial. The participants (age ≥ 18 years) had restorative need of Class I and/or II due to the presence of carious lesions and/or unsatisfactory restorations in at least three dental elements. Each participant received three application protocols for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE), one in each tooth to be restored: ER = etch-and-rinse + adhesive (n = 50); SEE = selective enamel etch + adhesive (n = 50) and SE = self-etch adhesive (n = 50). All teeth were restored in a similar way using Filtek™ Supreme composite resin (3M ESPE). Restorations were evaluated using the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, at baseline after 7 to 21 (12.02 ± 5.68) days (T1; n = 50 per group) and after 12 to 20 (15.8 ± 2.7) months (T2; n = 46 per group) by two previously calibrated evaluators (Kappa > 0.80). The statistical tests were performed between groups (Friedman), intragroup (Wilcoxon), and between the criteria considering acceptable and not acceptable restorations (McNemar), α = 0.05. Results A statistically significant difference was observed only for the property “superficial staining”, between groups at T2 (p = 0.01) for ER (n = 13 with score 2 or more) and SEE (n = 3 with score 2 or more) and intragroup for ER (T1, n = 1 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 13 with score 2 or more, p = 0.001) and SE (T1, n = 0 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 8 with score 2 or more p = 0.007). For the other comparisons between groups, intragroup, and between the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, there were no statistically significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). Conclusions It can be concluded that the different application protocols of the universal adhesive resulted in clinically “acceptable” restorations after 15.8 ± 2.7 months of follow-up. Adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria provided similar results to each other. Trial registration. Number in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-9p3hdp. Registered 24 May 2015.


1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatjana Dostalova ◽  
Helena Jelinkova ◽  
Hana Kucerova ◽  
Otakar Krejsa ◽  
Karel Hamal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 103325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidiane Costa de Souza ◽  
Nara Sousa Rodrigues ◽  
Diana Araújo Cunha ◽  
Victor Pinheiro Feitosa ◽  
Sérgio Lima Santiago ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document