scholarly journals Role of Proteolytic Enzyme Inhibitors on Carious and Eroded Dentin Associated With a Universal Bonding System

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E188-E196 ◽  
Author(s):  
MC Giacomini ◽  
PMC Scaffa ◽  
LP Chaves ◽  
CMP Vidal ◽  
TN Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Universal System ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Microtensile Test

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of proteolytic inhibitors on the bond strength of a universal adhesive system (etch-and-rinse mode) applied to artificial carious and eroded dentin. Methods: Ninety molars were prepared and randomly divided into three groups according to the substrate: N, no challenges; ACD, artificial carious dentin simulation and ERO, artificial erosion simulation with orange juice. All groups were redivided into three subgroups according to the dentin pretreatment: W, water; CHX, 2% digluconate chlorhexidine; and E-64 (trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-[4-guanidino] butane), 5 μM E-64 inhibitor. They constituted a total of nine groups (n=10): N-W, N-CHX, N-E64, ACD-W, ACD-CHX, ACD-E64, ERO-W, ERO-CHX, and ERO-E64. All specimens were restored with Adper Single Bond Universal/Filtek Z250. Beams (0.64 mm2) were obtained and subjected to the microtensile test (μTBS) in a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. The failure mode of the interfaces was determined by optical microscopy (40× magnification). Data were statistically analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (p<0.05). Results: All individual factors (p<0.0001) and the interaction between substrate and treatment (p=0.0011) and between substrate and time (p=0.0003) were statistically significant. The caries substrate contributed negatively to bond strength. Chlorhexidine reduced bond strength for normal and eroded conditions. Only the normal substrate was negatively affected by time despite the pretreatment. Conclusions: The universal bonding system appears to be a promising bonding strategy for the maintenance of bond strength to affected dentin. E-64 did not affect bonding to the dentin in contrast to the use of chlorhexidine, which, when associated with the universal system, did affect the microtensile bond strength for artificial carious dentin.

scholarly journals Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e219342
Author(s):  
Genine Moreira de Freitas Guimarães ◽  
Karin Cristina da Silva Modena ◽  
Carolina Yoshi Campos Sugio ◽  
Tamires de Luccas Bueno ◽  
Maria Angélica Silvério Agulhari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Adhesive Interface ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Microtensile Test ◽  
Microscopy Analysis

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the characteristics of the adhesive interface of Scotchbond Universal - SU – etch-and-rise mode (3M ESPE) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - MP (3M ESPE) to dentin over time. Methods: Class I cavity preparations were performed in 60 human molars that were randomly divided according to the dentin bonding system (DBS) used (n=30): (1) Acid conditioning + SU and (2) Acid conditioning + MP. For bonding strength (BS) analysis, 30 teeth (n = 15) were sectioned into sticks and submitted to the microtensile test in a universal testing machine after 24 hours and 12 months. The adhesive interface of the others 30 teeth was analyzed in a confocal microscope after 24 hours and 12 months. The data of μTBS were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Results: SU presented the lowest DBS compared to MP (p=0.000). Time did not influenced DBS for both adhesive systems (p=0.177). Confocal microscopy analysis showed no cracks between both adhesive systems tested. Conclusion: The results indicate that MP - μTBS showed a better performance compared to SU in total-etch mode.

scholarly journals Bond strength assessment of a universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo do Prado SCHOENHALS ◽  
Cinthia Lais BERFT ◽  
Fabiana Scarparo NAUFEL ◽  
Vera Lucia SCHMITT ◽  
Larissa Pinceli CHAVES
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Strength Assessment ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
The Times ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Introduction Modern dentistry is reflected in the insertion of new materials with different adhesion forms in dental structures, such as the Universal adhesive system. Objective To evaluate the bond strength of the universal dentin adhesive system, in the form of self-etching and conventional application, compared with a simplified conventional adhesive system, in two distinct periods: 1 week and 6 months. Material and method 48 bovine incisors separated into 6 groups, stored for 7 days, were selected. Worn out the buccal enamel until dentin exposure. Adper Single Bond 2 (3M Espe) or SingleBond Universal (3M Espe) adhesives were applied, and catheters filled with Opallis Flow (FGM) composite were placed. After photoactivation, the catheters were removed and the specimens (n = 48), stored in distilled water at 37 °C for one week and six months, were exposed. The specimens were fixed to a universal testing machine (EMIC DL 2000) with a speed of 0.5 mm / min. Bond strength (BS) was calculated in MPa, and data were statistically analyzed by Anova and Tukey test at 5% significance level. Result For Adper Single bond, the BS was equivalent in the times tested; for Universal conventional and self-conditioning time influenced the BS, with a decrease in the results. At 1 week, all stickers were different from each other, with higher BS for Universal conventional mode, followed by universal self-etching mode and then Adper Single bond. Conclusion The best results were achieved with universal adhesive in conventional mode for both tested times.

Degradation of Multimode Adhesive System Bond Strength to Artificial Caries-Affected Dentin Due to Water Storage

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E92-E101 ◽  
Author(s):  
AC Follak ◽  
LL Miotti ◽  
TL Lenzi ◽  
RO Rocha ◽  
FZM Soares
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Influence Of Water ◽  
Microtensile Test ◽  
Post Hoc

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of water storage on bond strength of multimode adhesive systems to artificially induced caries-affected dentin. One hundred twelve sound bovine incisors were randomly assigned to 16 groups (n=7) according to the dentin condition (sound; SND, artificially induced caries-affected dentin; CAD, cariogenic challenge by pH cycling for 14 days); the adhesive system (SU, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive; AB, All-Bond Universal; PB, Prime & Bond Elect; SB, Adper Single Bond 2; and CS, Clearfil SE Bond), and the etching strategy (etch-and-rinse and self-etch). All adhesive systems were applied under manufacturer's instructions to flat dentin surfaces, and a composite block was built up on each dentin surface. After 24 hours of water storage, the specimens were sectioned into stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm2) and submitted to a microtensile test immediately (24 hours) or after six months of water storage. Bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test (α=5%), considering each substrate separately (SND and CAD). The etching strategy did not influence the bond strength of multimode adhesives, irrespective of the dentin condition. Water storage only reduced significantly the bond strength to CAD. The degradation of bond strength due to water storage was more pronounced in CAD, regardless of the etching strategy.

scholarly journals Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bond Strength to Enamel using Universal Adhesive Systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 820-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus R Tonetto ◽  
Ana CS Diniz ◽  
Larissa M Pinheiro ◽  
Lauber J dos Santosh Almeida ◽  
Carlos RG Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Universal System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Introduction The adhesive systems and the techniques currently used are designed to provide a more effective adhesion with reduction of the protocol application. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of universal adhesive systems on enamel in different etching modes (self-etch and total etch). Materials and methods The mesial and distal halves of 52 bovine incisors, healthy, freshly extracted, were used and divided into seven experimental groups (n = 13). The enamel was treated in accordance with the following experimental conditions: FUE-Universal System – Futurabond U (VOCO) with etching; FUWE – Futurabond U (VOCO) without etching; SB-Total Etch System – Single Bond 2 (3M); SBUE-Universal System – Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE) with etching; SBUWE – Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE) without etching; CLE-Self-etch System – Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) was applied with etching; CLWE – Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) without etching. The specimens were made using the composite spectrum TPH (Dentsply) and stored in distilled water (37 ± 1°C) for 1 month. The microshear test was performed using the universal testing machine EMIC DL 2000 with the crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The bond strength values were analyzed using statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test) with Bonferroni correction. Results There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.05), where FUE (36.83 ± 4.9 MPa) showed the highest bond strength values and SBUWE (18.40 ± 2.2 MPa) showed the lowest bond strength values. The analysis of adhesive interface revealed that most failures occurred between the interface composite resin and adhesive. Conclusion The universal adhesive system used in dental enamel varies according to the trademark, and the previous enamel etching for universal systems and the self-etch both induced greater bond strength values. Clinical significance Selective enamel etching prior to the application of a universal adhesive system is a relevant strategy for better performance bonding. How to cite this article Diniz ACS, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, dos Santos Almeida LJr, Torres CRG, Borges AH, Pinto SCS, Tonetto MR, De Jesus Tavarez RR, Firoozmand LM. Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bond Strength to Enamel using Universal Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(10):820-825.

scholarly journals The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Bahari ◽  
Siavash Savadi Oskoee ◽  
Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom ◽  
Nasim Molayi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Aluminium Chloride ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Composite Samples

Background. Contamination of dentin surface is one of the common problems in restorative dentistry. The aim was to investigate the effects of different surface contaminators on the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive system (UAS) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies. Methods. One hundred forty-four maxillary anterior sound human teeth were divided into six groups based on the types of surface contaminators: no surface contaminator (control) and experimental groups contaminated with blood, saliva, aluminium chloride (ALC), ferric sulphate (FS), and caries disclosing agent (CDA). Then, each group was further subdivided into two, based on the application strategy of UAS (ER and SE). After applying the adhesive according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and bonding cylindrical composite samples, the SBS was measured. The data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and t test (P<0.05). Results. The SBS in all contaminated groups, except for CDA, was significantly lower in both ER and SE strategies compared to control group (P<0.05). A comparison between the application strategies revealed that ER and SE were only significantly different in the FS contaminated group (P<0.05). Conclusion. All tested contaminators, except CDA, significantly decreased SBS of UAS in both ER and SE strategies.

Does Bonding Approach Influence the Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive to Dentin of Primary Teeth?

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tathiane Larissa Lenzi ◽  
Fabio Zovico Maxnuck Soares ◽  
Rachel de Oliveira Rocha
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Tooth Dentin ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
One Way Anova

Objective: To evaluate the effect of bonding strategy on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a new universal adhesive system to primary tooth dentin. Study design: Flat dentin surfaces from 25 primary molars were assigned to 5 groups according to the adhesive and bonding approach: Adper Single Bond 2 (two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive) and Clearfil SE Bond (two-step self-etch system), as controls; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive–self-etch, dry or wet-bonding etch-and-rinse strategies. Composite buildups were constructed and the teeth were sectioned to obtain bonded sticks (0.8 mm2) to be tested under tension at 1mm/min. The μTBS means were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α = 0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (400×). Results: Universal adhesive applied following both dry and wet-bonding etch-and-rinse strategies showed similar bond strength compared with control adhesive systems. Self-etch approach resulted in the lowest μTBS values. For all groups, adhesive/mixed failure prevailed. The percentage of premature debonded specimens was higher when the universal adhesive was used as self-etch mode. Conclusion: The universal adhesive does not share the same versatility of being used in the etch-and-rinse and self-etch approaches; however, the use of the new adhesive following either wet or dry-bonding may be a suitable option as alternative to two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive protocol.

scholarly journals Microshear Bond Strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to Primary and Permanent Dentin: A Six-Month In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari ◽  
Amir Ghasemi ◽  
Mohammadreza Badiee ◽  
Zahra Abdolazimi ◽  
Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Mode Of Application ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Self Etch

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of Scotchbond Universal adhesive, used in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes, to primary and permanent dentin at 24 hours and six months. Materials and Methods: A total of 88 composite micro-cylinders were divided into eight groups (n=11) as follows: (A) Etch-and-rinse, 24 hours, primary dentin; (B) Self-etch, 24 hours, primary dentin; (C) Etch-and-rinse, six months, primary dentin; (D) Self-etch, six months, primary dentin; (E) Etch-and-rinse, 24 hours, permanent dentin; (F) Self-etch, 24 hours, permanent dentin; (G) Etch-and-rinse, six months, permanent dentin; (H) Self-etch, six months, permanent dentin. The MSBS was measured by a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The mean MSBS was 12.3±2.3 MPa in A, 18.8±4.1 MPa in B, 11.9±3.7 MPa in C, 16±2.9 MPa in D, 19.1±2.7 MPa in E, 22.8±4.1 MPa in F, 16.2±2.6 MPa in G, and 17.2±4.4 MPa in H. In the self-etch mode, the MSBS was significantly higher than that in the etch-and-rinse mode (P<0.001). The MSBS in permanent teeth was significantly higher than primary teeth (P<0.001). At six months, the MSBS significantly decreased in all groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: The micro-shear bond strength of Scotchbond Universal adhesive decreases over time and depends on the type of tooth and the mode of application of the adhesive.

scholarly journals Bond strength of universal adhesive applied to dry and wet dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e201662
Author(s):  
Maria Luísa de Alencar e Silva Leite ◽  
Caroline de Farias Charamba ◽  
Renally Bezerra Wanderley e Lima ◽  
Sônia Saeger Meireles ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Bonding Quality ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of dentin wettability on the immediate and extended microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of a universal adhesive system used in the etch-and-rinse strategy. Methods: Twenty human third molars were selected and divided into four groups according to the adhesive system and dentin wettability. The mTBS values of each group were registered 24 h and one year after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=30). Data were analyzed by the t-test (p<0.05). Results: When both adhesive systems were compared, there was no statistically significant difference when they were applied following wet bonding (p>0.05). However, the dry bonding reduced μTBS values of the Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive (p<0.05). Regarding storage time, both groups presented similar μTBS values at 24 h and one year (p>0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, the Scotchbond Universal Adhesive can be applied to dry or wet dentin without compromising the etch-and-rinse bonding quality and the durability of the restorations.

scholarly journals Bonding of adhesives to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 016-023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia Koliniotou-Koumpia ◽  
Pantelis Kouros ◽  
Lazaros Zafiriadis ◽  
Effimia Koumpia ◽  
Pavlos Dionysopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Failure Patterns ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACTObjective: The shear bond strength of adhesives applied to dentin was investigated after irradiation with an erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser.Methods: Superficial and deep dentin specimens from human molars were treated either with carbide bur or an Er:YAG laser. Two etch and rinse adhesives (Single Bond and XP Bond) and two self-etch adhesives (Prompt L-Pop and Xeno III) were employed to bond the composite. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined after storage in water for 24 h using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure patterns and modes were analyzed and evaluated using a stereomicroscope. In addition, samples were processed for Scanning Electron Microscopy SEM evaluation. A linear mixed model was used, and pairwise comparisons were made using the Bonferroni test.Results: Results showed significant differences between the levels of dentin treatment (p=.01) in carbide bur-cut dentin and lased dentin, as well as significant interaction effects due to the depth of dentin and the bonding system used. The etch and rinse adhesives bonded less effectively with lased dentin than with carbide bur-cut dentin, while self-etch adhesives bonded equally well with lased and bur-cut superficial dentin but much less effectively with lased deep dentin than with bur-cut deep dentin. SEM revealed a predominantly adhesive failure mode in laser-ablated fractured specimens, while a mixed failure mode was apparent in the bur-cut fractured specimens.Conclusions: Cavities prepared by laser seem less receptive to adhesive procedures than conventional bur-cut cavities. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:16-23)

scholarly journals Bond Strength and Cytotoxicity of a Universal Adhesive According to the Hybridization Strategies to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luísa de Alencar e Silva Leite ◽  
Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade ◽  
Diana Gabriela Soares
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Etch And Rinse

Abstract This study evaluated application protocol (etch-and-rinse/ER and self-etching/SE) and dentin wettability (wet and dry) on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and transdentinal cytotoxicity of ScotchbondTM Universal (SU) adhesive system. The μTBS values and fracture mode were registered 24 h after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=5). For analysis of transdentinal cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells were seeded on pulpal surface of dentin discs (0.4 mm thick) adapted to artificial pulp chambers (n=8). The adhesive system was applied to occlusal surface, followed by 24-h incubation time. Cell viability (Alamar Blue) and morphology (SEM) were assessed. Adper Single Bond 2 and Clearfil SE Bond were used as positive controls of the ER and SE application protocols, respectively. No treatment was performed on negative control (NC) group. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α=5%). Higher μTBS values were found for ER mode in comparison with SE protocol (p<0.05). Dentin wettability had no effect on bond strength of SU in both the ER and SE techniques (p>0.05). Most fractures involved hybrid layer and/or adhesive layer. Neither variable prevented the intense toxic effects of adhesive systems on MDPC-23 cultured cells, since intense reduction in cell viability (±88%) and severe alterations in cell morphology were observed for all groups compared to NC, with no differences among them (p>0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that application of SU following the ER protocol had better adhesive performance. However, this adhesive system featured intense transdentinal cytotoxicity to pulp cells, regardless of application protocol and dentin wettability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document