Shear Bond Strength of Different Repair Systems to Titanium After Water Aging

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
IG Haneda ◽  
RG Fonseca ◽  
FO Abi-Rached ◽  
GL Adabo ◽  
CAS Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Pure Titanium ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Repair Systems ◽  
Cp Ti ◽  
Storage Times

SUMMARY This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) and stability of commercially pure titanium (CP Ti)/repair material interfaces promoted by different repair systems. One hundred CP Ti cast discs were divided into five repair system groups: 1) Epricord (EP); 2) Bistite II DC (BT); 3) Cojet (CJ); 4) Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SB) (control group); and 5) Cojet Sand plus Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (CJSB). The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C, thermal cycled (5000 cycles, 5°-55°C) and stored under the same conditions for either 24 hours or six months (n=10). SBS was tested and the data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (α=.05). Failure mode was determined with a stereomicroscope (20×). The repair system, storage time, and their interaction significantly affected the SBS (p<0.001). At 24 hours, CJSB exhibited the highest SBS value, followed by CJ. At six months, these two groups had similar mean SBS (p>0.05) and higher means in comparison to the other groups. For both storage times, BT presented the lowest SBS, while the EP and SB groups did not differ significantly from one another (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in SBS between the storage times for the groups EP and CJ (p>0.05). The groups BT, SB, and CJSB showed 100% adhesive failure, irrespective of storage time. The CJSB group showed the highest SBS at both storage times. At six months, the CJ group exhibited a similar SBS mean value when compared to the CJSB group. Water storage adversely affected the groups BT, SB (control group), and CJSB. Considering SBS values, stability, and the failure mode simultaneously, the CJ group showed the best CP Ti repair performance.

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 8308
Author(s):  
Farid S. El-Askary ◽  
Sara A. Botros ◽  
Mutlu Özcan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Oxygen Inhibition ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and storage time on immediate repair bond durability of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill composites. In total, 265 discs were divided into 32 groups (n = 8/group) according to: (1) Material: X-tra fil and Admira Fusion X-tra; (2) Surface treatment: oxygen inhibition; matrix; Futurabond M+; Silane/Futurabond M+; Admira Bond; Silane/Admira Bond; ceramic repair system; and Silane/Cimara bond; and (3) Storage time: 24 h and 6 months. Each disc received three micro-cylinders from the same material. Specimens were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing either at 24 h or 6 months. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey’s test/Student t-test (p = 0.05). All experimental factors had significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.0001). Drop in bond strength was noticed in both materials after six months (p < 0.05), except for Admira Fusion X-tra treated with silane/cimara adhesive (p = 0.860). Both materials showed insignificant values with Admira bond either at 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.275 and p = 0.060, respectively). For other treatments, X-tra fil showed significantly higher values at 24 h and 6 months (p < 0.05). Ceramic repair system can be used to immediately repair both methacrylate- and ormocer-based composites.

scholarly journals Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Cardoso ◽  
◽  
Joana Godinho ◽  
Luís Jardim ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Machine Failure

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the surface treatment and adhesive system on the shear bond strength and the failure mode of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate surfaces. Methods: Ninety metal brackets (n=15) were bonded to aged discs of polymethylmethacrylate SR Ivocron subjected to three surface conditions (no treatment; sandblasting with 50-μm aluminum oxide; roughening with a tungsten bur), using two combinations of adhesives (methylmethacrylate monomer + Transbond XT Primer; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) followed by the composite Transbond XT. In the control group, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to 15 human mandibular incisors. The specimens were thermocycled, stored in distilled water (37ºC, 7 days), and tested in shear, using an Instron universal machine. Failure mode was classified according to the adhesive remnant index using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with an analysis of variance and posthoc tests (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between the bracket bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate with different surface treatments (p<0.001). Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was superior to tungsten bur roughening. The adhesive system did not significantly influence the shear bond strength nor the failure mode (p=0.8415). All experimental groups showed lower bond strengths than the control group (p=0.1566). Conclusions: Mechanical surface treatment significantly influenced the bracket’s bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was the most effective mechanical treatment. The weakest adhesive link was found at the acrylic-adhesive interface. Orthodontic bonding to polymethylmethacrylate was weaker than bonding to enamel, regardless of the surface treatment and the adhesive used.

scholarly journals The Effect of Different Bracket Base Cleaning Method on Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Brackets

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad F Al Maaitah ◽  
Sawsan Alomari ◽  
Elham S Abu Alhaija ◽  
Ahmed AM Saf
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Slow Speed ◽  
Cleaning Method ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Random Samples ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bracket Base

ABSTRACT Aim To assess the effect of different bracket base conditioning method on shear bond strength (SBS) of rebonded brackets. Materials and methods Eighty brackets were bonded to freshly extracted premolar teeth using light cured composite adhesive. SBS was measured for 20 random samples as control group (G1). After debonding, 60 debonded brackets were allocated randomly into three groups of bracket base conditioning methods to remove the remaining adhesives. G2: bracket base cleaned with slow speed round carbide bur (CB), G3: cleaned with ultrasonic scaler (US), G4: cleaned with sandblasting (SB). After that, brackets were rebonded in the same manner as first bonding and SBS was measured. Modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recorded for all groups. Results SBS for new brackets was 11.95 MPa followed by 11.65 MPa for G2, 11.56 MPa for G4 and 11.04 MPa for G3 group. There were no statistically significant differences between all groups (p = 0.946). In all groups, failure mode showed that the majority of adhesive composite remained on the bracket base with ARI of 4. There was no statistically significant difference between all groups in ARI (p = 0.584). Conclusion In-office methods; slow speed CB and US are effective, quick and cheap methods for bracket base cleaning for rebonding. How to cite this article Al Maaitah EF, Alomari S, Alhaija ESA, Safi AAM. The Effect of Different Bracket Base Cleaning Method on Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Brackets. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(5):866-870.

scholarly journals Influence of Water Storage and Bonding Material on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets to Ceramic

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Rosa Costa ◽  
Américo Bortolazzo Correr ◽  
Simonides Consani ◽  
Maria Cecília Caldas Giorgi ◽  
Silvia Amélia Vedovello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Influence Of Water ◽  
Total Exposure Time ◽  
Storage Times ◽  
Four Cylinders

Abstract: This study investigated the influence of water storage (24 h and 6 months), and Transbond XT and Fuji Ortho LC bonding materials on the bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to feldspathic ceramic. Four cylinders of feldspathic ceramic were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s. Each cylinder received two layers of silane. Metallic brackets were bonded to the cylinders using Transbond XT or Fuji Ortho LC. Light-activation was carried out with 40 s total exposure time using Bluephase G2. Half the specimens for each bonding materials (n=20) were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and the other half for 6 months. Shear bond strength testing was performed after storage times at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to evaluate the amount of adhesive remaining on the ceramic surface at ×8 magnification. Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Transbond XT showed significantly higher bond strength (p<0.05) than Fuji Ortho LC. Significant differences in bond strength (p<0.05) were found when 24 h and 6 months storage times were compared between materials. ARI showed a predominance of score 0 for all groups, and higher scores at 1, 2 and 3 for 24 h storage time. In conclusion, storage time and bonding materials showed significant influence on the bond strength of brackets to ceramic.

scholarly journals Effect of Self-etchant pH on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An in vitro Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
BM Shivalinga ◽  
H Jyothikiran ◽  
Amit Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
System Control ◽  
Bond System

ABSTRACT Aims To determine the effect of self-etchant pH on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets; to compare the shear bond strengths of brackets bonded with three SEPs and brackets bonded with conventional etch, rinse, bond method and to find the brackets/adhesive failure mode. Materials and methods One hundred and twenty premolar teeth were cleaned, mounted, and randomly divided into four groups of 30 samples each- Transbond XT conventional etch and bond system (control), Adper SE Plus SEP (3M ESPE) with a pH of 0.9 to 1.0, Transbond Plus SEP (3M Unitek) with a pH of about 1.0 and Clearfil SE Bond SEP (Kuraray America) with a pH of around 2.0. All teeth were bonded with Transbond XT paste (3M Unitek). The teeth were debonded within half an hour after initial bonding by using a universal testing machine. The residual adhesive on each tooth was evaluated. ANOVA was used to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the three groups, and the Chi-square test was used to compare the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores for the three groups. Results ANOVA indicated significant differences between the groups. Clearfil attained the SBS (6.5 ± 0.6689 MPa) closest to the control group, whereas Adper inspite of being the most aggressive recorded the lowest SBS (5.7 ± 0.5695 MPa). Transbond self-etching primer achieved a mean SBS of 6.1 ± 0.6211 MPa. However, all the three SEPs recorded SBS which was significantly less than that of Transbond conventional etch, rinse and bond system (11.8027 ± 0.8059 MPa). The comparisons of the ARI scores between the three groups indicated that bracket failure mode was significantly different between the three groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion These findings show that factors other than pH, such as the ability of the bonding adhesive to form a chemical bond to enamel and the strength of the bonding adhesive itself, significantly influence the SBS of orthodontic brackets. How to cite this article Goyal A, Jyothikiran H, Shivalinga BM. Effect of Self-etchant pH on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An in vitro Study. World J Dent 2012;3(1):41-49.

scholarly journals The micro-shear bond strength of two different repair systems to indirect restorative materials

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-241
Author(s):  
Atay Ayșe ◽  
◽  
Najafova Lamia ◽  
Kurtulmus Huseyin Mehmet ◽  
Üşümez Aslihan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Acid Mixture ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Repair Systems

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different repair systems (Clearfil Repair, iGOS Repair) to restorative materials for CAD/CAM (Cerasmart, Lava Ultimate, InCoris TZI , VITA Suprinity, VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, IPS Empress CAD). Methodology The 140 1.2 mm-thick specimens were prepared from CAD/CAM blocks (n=20) and thermocycled (10,000 cycles, 5–55°C, dwell time 20s). The specimens were randomly divided into two groups according to the repair system: Clearfil Repair (40% phosphoric acid+mixture of Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator and Clearfil SE Bond Primer+Clearfil SE Bond+CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2) and iGOS Repair (40% phosphoric acid+ Multi Primer LIQUID+ iGOS Bond+ iGOS Universal). The composite resins were polymerized. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The μSBS test was performed with a micro-shear testing machine (at 1 mm/min). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p<0.05. Each failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope at×16 magnification. Results The type of CAD/CAM restorative material and repair system showed a significant effect on the μSBS (p<0.05). Specimens repaired with the iGOS Repair system showed the highest μSBS values than the Clearfil Repair system among all tested materials except for the InCoris TZI group (p<0.05). Conclusion All groups, except for the InCoris TZI group, repaired with iGOS Repair system showed higher μSBS than Clearfil Repair. The type of restoration and repair material is important in the success of the fracture repair.

scholarly journals Effect of using Different Remineralizing Agents on Micro-shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite Resin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
Ebaa I. Alagha
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Sodium Fluoride ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
And Control ◽  
Storage Times ◽  
Positive Effect

AIM: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different remineralizing agents on micro-shear bond strength (SBS) of nanohybrid composite resin to dentin. METHODS: Thirty-six human molars were divided into four main equal groups (nine teeth each) according to the type of remineralizing agent used; nanohydroxyapatite, sodium fluoride, fluorohydroxyapatite, and control without remineralizing agent. Each group was divided into three equal subgroups (three teeth each) according to the storage time; 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months. Specially fabricated cylindrical plastic mold was made, and teeth were embedded vertically in the mold to the level of cementoenamel junction of the tooth leaving the occlusal surface projecting above the surface of the mold. Cylindrical fissure carbide bur was used in teeth preparation. Teeth were trimmed perpendicular to the long axes of them. Demineralizing agents (Nano hydroxyapatite, sodium fluoride, and fluorohydroxyapatite) were applied then adhesive system applied then composite resin was applied using five sections of a pediatric intravenous tube to act as molds for composite specimen then the specimens stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for different storage times in an incubator. The micro-SBS was assessed using universal testing machine. Then, the mode of failure for each group was determined using stereomicroscope device. Then, the obtained data were tabulated and statistically analyzed. One-way ANOVA was used to compare between more than two non-related samples. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference between the four studied groups regarding bond strength at different storage times. Fluorohydroxyapatite had the highest bond strength mean values followed by nanohydroxyapatite, while the lowest value was the sodium fluoride group. CONCLUSION: Fluorohydroxyapatite and nanohydroxyapatite had a positive effect on micro-SBS to dentin, but sodium fluoride had a negative effect. The storage time increase had a positive effect on the micro-SBS of dentin with fluorohydroxyapatite and nanohydroxyapatite, also it had adverse effect on the dentin bond strength with sodium fluoride and control groups.

The assessment of the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair methods

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Premkumari S. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Laser Surface ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Laser Surface Treatment ◽  
Repair Systems

The aim of this study is to assess the shear security quality of two intra oral clay fix frameworks on metal substrate and fired substrate and to contrast among gatherings with evaluate a superior earthenware fix framework after corrosive scratching and laser surface treatment. Therefore, 40 Nickel chromium and 40 feldspathic ceramic specimens were fabricated and divided into two main groups which were further subdivided into four subgroups based on the repair systems used and surface treatments, which had ten specimens each. Hydrofluoric acid and Erbium-doped Yttrium aluminum garnet laser were used as surface treatments and two intra oral repair systems used were Bisco and Angelus. Bonded specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours before being thermocycled at 5°C to 55°C for 300 cycles with a 30-second dwell time. The specimens were stored for an additional 7 days before being subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine with a 10KN load cell at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The bond strength values obtained were recorded in MPa and analyzed using independent t test. The outcomes indicate that the shear bond strength values obtained were highly significant for Bisco when compared to Angelus for both the metal and ceramic substrates. Similarly, after acid etching and laser surface treatment, Bisco proved to be better. At the end, Bisco repair system had significantly higher shear bond strength values when compared to Angelus. Hence it is the preferred choice for intraoral repair of fractured metal ceramic restorations. Er: YAG laser surface treatment is the recommended surface treatment for intraoral repair. Available online at https://int-scientific-journals.com

scholarly journals The Outcome of Immediate or Delayed Application of a Single-Step Self-Etch Adhesive to Coronal Dentin Following the Application of Different Endodontic Irrigants

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shehab-El Din Mohammed Saber ◽  
Farid Sabry El-Askary
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Physiologic Saline ◽  
Adhesive Application ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACTObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate or delayed bonding of a single-step self-etch adhesive to coronal dentin after the application of different endodontic irrigants.Methods: Thirty five human molars were used. The coronal dentin was irrigated with either 0.9% physiologic saline (NS), 2% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) or 2.5% commercially used sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Compositecylinders were bonded with the coronal dentin using the Clearfil S3 bond, which was applied either immediatelyor after one week storage time following the irrigation procedures. Shear bond strength testing was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min, and the resin/dentin interface was evaluated using SEM.Results: Irrigation with NS, CHX, or NaOCL followed by immediate adhesive application resulted in a reduction in the shear bond strength values recorded and this was statistically significant in comparison with the control group (P<.05). However, delaying the adhesive application resulted in a statistically significant (P<.05) improvement in the shear bond strength recorded in specimens irrigated with NS and CHX only.Conclusions: Delaying the bonding procedures for one week appeared to be beneficial in improving the shear bond strength of Clearfil S3 bond with coronal dentin especially when NS and CHX were used as endodontic irrigants. NaOCL proved to be an incompatible irrigating solution when used prior to the application of such adhesive. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:83-89)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document